Literature DB >> 31904715

Low-Velocity Loss Induces Similar Strength Gains to Moderate-Velocity Loss During Resistance Training.

Carlos Galiano1, Fernando Pareja-Blanco1,2, Javier Hidalgo de Mora1, Eduardo Sáez de Villarreal1,2.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Galiano, C, Pareja-Blanco, F, Hidalgo de Mora, J, and Sáez de Villarreal, E. Low-velocity loss induces similar strength gains to moderate-velocity loss during resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 36(2): 340-345, 2022-This study aimed to analyze the effects of 2 velocity-based resistance training (VBT) programs that used the same relative loading but differed in the velocity loss (VL) throughout the set: 5% (VL5) vs. 20% (VL20). Twenty-eight physically active men (age: 23.0 ± 3.2 years; height: 175.8 ± 4.7 cm; body mass: 73.8 ± 10.8 kg) were randomly assigned to 2 groups: VL5 (n = 15) or VL20 (n = 13). Subjects followed a 7-week (14 sessions) VBT program using the squat exercise while repetition velocity was monitored. The following variables were assessed at pretest and posttest: estimated 1-repetition maximum (1RM); average velocity attained for all absolute loads common to pretest and posttest (AV); average velocity for those loads that were moved faster than 1 m·s-1 (AV > 1); average velocity for those loads that were moved slower than 1 m·s-1 (AV < 1); countermovement jump (CMJ); and 20-m running sprint time (T20). T20 and CMJ height were assessed before each training session to analyze their evolution during the training program. The VL5 group executed only 32.6% of the total repetitions performed by the VL20 group (156.9 ± 25.0 vs. 480.5 ± 162.0 rep). Both groups improved significantly (p < 0.01) in all variables analyzed (1RM, AV, AV > 1, AV < 1, CMJ, and T20) from pretest to posttest, with no significant differences between them. Therefore, a low VL (5%) induced similar gains in strength, jump, and sprint performance to a moderate VL of 20%, despite VL5 performing only 32.6% of the repetitions achieved by the VL20 group.
Copyright © 2020 National Strength and Conditioning Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 31904715     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  8 in total

Review 1.  CYP1A2 genotype and acute ergogenic effects of caffeine intake on exercise performance: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jozo Grgic; Craig Pickering; Juan Del Coso; Brad J Schoenfeld; Pavle Mikulic
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  Effects of subjective and objective autoregulation methods for intensity and volume on enhancing maximal strength during resistance-training interventions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stian Larsen; Eirik Kristiansen; Roland van den Tillaar
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Differences between adjusted vs. non-adjusted loads in velocity-based training: consequences for strength training control and programming.

Authors:  Pedro Jiménez-Reyes; Adrian Castaño-Zambudio; Víctor Cuadrado-Peñafiel; Jorge M González-Hernández; Fernando Capelo-Ramírez; Luis M Martínez-Aranda; Juan J González-Badillo
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  The Effect of Load and Volume Autoregulation on Muscular Strength and Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Landyn M Hickmott; Philip D Chilibeck; Keely A Shaw; Scotty J Butcher
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-01-15

5.  Effects of velocity based training vs. traditional 1RM percentage-based training on improving strength, jump, linear sprint and change of direction speed performance: A Systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai-Fang Liao; Xin-Xin Wang; Meng-Yuan Han; Lin-Long Li; George P Nassis; Yong-Ming Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Role of Velocity-Based Training (VBT) in Enhancing Athletic Performance in Trained Individuals: A Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Xing Zhang; Siyuan Feng; Rui Peng; Hansen Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  The effectiveness of traditional vs. velocity-based strength training on explosive and maximal strength performance: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Steffen Held; Kevin Speer; Ludwig Rappelt; Pamela Wicker; Lars Donath
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 8.  Velocity-Based Resistance Training on 1-RM, Jump and Sprint Performance: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Mateo Baena-Marín; Andrés Rojas-Jaramillo; Jhonatan González-Santamaría; David Rodríguez-Rosell; Jorge L Petro; Richard B Kreider; Diego A Bonilla
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.