| Literature DB >> 31903516 |
Brady T West1, Parviz K Kavoussi2, Kate C Odenwald2, Krista London2, Caitlin L Hunn2, Shu-Hung Chen2, John David Wininger2, Melissa S Gilkey2, Keikhosrow M Kavoussi2, Shahryar K Kavoussi3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine if certain clinical and/or embryologic factors are independently associated with the increased prevalence of subchorionic hematoma (SCH) among pregnancies achieved via in vitro fertilization (IVF) with fresh embryo transfer (ET).Entities:
Keywords: Assisted reproductive technologies; IVF; In vitro fertilization; Subchorionic clot; Subchorionic hematoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31903516 PMCID: PMC7056706 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01684-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet ISSN: 1058-0468 Impact factor: 3.412
Descriptions of clinical and embryology measures analyzed in this study as potential factors associated with the presence of SCH in IVF pregnancies
| Variable | Value labels | Percentages/means |
|---|---|---|
| SCH | 1 = yes 0 = no | 30.95% (65/210) 69.05% (145/210) |
| Day of embryo transfer | 3 = day 3 5 = day 5 | 43.81% (92/210) 56.19% (118/210) |
| SACS | 1 = one sac 2 = two sacs 3 = 3 sacs | 68.57% (144/210) 30.95% (65/210) 0.48% (1/210) |
| TE* | 1 = grade A 0 = grade B or C | 52.99% (62/117) 47.01% (55/117) |
| Prior uterine surgery | 1 = yes 0 = no | 20.00% (42/210) 80.00% (168/210) |
| LAH | 1 = yes 0 = no | 57.62% (121/210) 42.38% (89/210) |
| Peak E2 | Continuous | Mean = 2089.51, SD = 965.25, |
| Final P4 | Continuous | Mean = 0.82, SD = 0.35, |
| ICSI | 1 = yes 0 = no | 91.90% (193/210) 8.10% (17/210) |
| Mature oocytes retrieved | Continuous | Mean = 10.56, SD = 5.36, |
| 1-cell embryos | Continuous | Mean = 8.27, SD = 4.39, n = 210 |
| Number of embryos transferred | Continuous | Mean = 2.11, SD = 0.70, n = 210 |
*TE frequencies are restricted to the 117 cases where this grading was performed
SCH, subchorionic hematoma; TE, trophectoderm; LAH, laser-assisted hatching; E2, estradiol; P4, progesterone; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection
Fig. 1Examples of blastocyst trophectoderm (TE) grading A, B, and C
Estimates of adjusted odds ratios in a multivariable logistic regression model fitted to the SCH data for cases with no missing data where TE grading was performed (n = 113)
| Predictor | Adjusted odds ratio | 95% confidence interval |
|---|---|---|
| SACS | ||
| 1 | Reference | |
| 2 | 0.93 | 0.35–2.48 |
| TE | ||
| A | 0.25 | 0.09–0.68** |
| B or C | Reference | |
| Prior uterine surgery | ||
| Yes | 0.62 | 0.20–1.87 |
| No | Reference | |
| LAH | ||
| Yes | 1.59 | 0.64–3.95 |
| No | Reference | |
| Peak E2 (in thousands) | 0.58 | 0.31–1.08 |
| Final P4 | 0.35 | 0.08–1.42 |
| ICSI | ||
| Yes | 2.28 | 0.39–13.33 |
| No | Reference | |
| Mature oocytes retrieved | 1.00 | 0.84–1.20 |
| 1-cell embryos | 0.95 | 0.78–1.17 |
| Number of embryos transferred | 0.78 | 0.29–2.05 |
*p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test p value = 0.11