Tim Denham1, Huw Barton2, Cristina Castillo3, Alison Crowther4,5, Emilie Dotte-Sarout1,6, S Anna Florin4, Jenifer Pritchard1, Aleese Barron1, Yekun Zhang1, Dorian Q Fuller3,7. 1. School of Archaeology and Anthropology, College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia. 2. School of Archaeology and Ancient History, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, UK. 3. University College London, Institute of Archaeology, 31-34 Gordon Square, London, UK. 4. School of Social Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. 5. Department of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany. 6. School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Business, Law & Education, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia. 7. School of Archaeology and Museology, Northwest University, Xian, Shaanxi, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vegetatively propagated crops are globally significant in terms of current agricultural production, as well as for understanding the long-term history of early agriculture and plant domestication. Today, significant field crops include sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum), potato (Solanum tuberosum), manioc (Manihot esculenta), bananas and plantains (Musa cvs), sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), yams (Dioscorea spp.) and taro (Colocasia esculenta). In comparison with sexually reproduced crops, especially cereals and legumes, the domestication syndrome in vegetatively propagated field crops is poorly defined. AIMS AND SCOPE: Here, a range of phenotypic traits potentially comprising a syndrome associated with early domestication of vegetatively propagated field crops is proposed, including: mode of reproduction, yield of edible portion, ease of harvesting, defensive adaptations, timing of production and plant architecture. The archaeobotanical visibility of these syndrome traits is considered with a view to the reconstruction of the geographical and historical pathways of domestication for vegetatively propagated field crops in the past. CONCLUSIONS: Although convergent phenotypic traits are identified, none of them are ubiquitous and some are divergent. In contrast to cereals and legumes, several traits seem to represent varying degrees of plastic response to growth environment and practices of cultivation, as opposed to solely morphogenetic 'fixation'.
BACKGROUND: Vegetatively propagated crops are globally significant in terms of current agricultural production, as well as for understanding the long-term history of early agriculture and plant domestication. Today, significant field crops include sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum), potato (Solanum tuberosum), manioc (Manihot esculenta), bananas and plantains (Musa cvs), sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), yams (Dioscorea spp.) and taro (Colocasia esculenta). In comparison with sexually reproduced crops, especially cereals and legumes, the domestication syndrome in vegetatively propagated field crops is poorly defined. AIMS AND SCOPE: Here, a range of phenotypic traits potentially comprising a syndrome associated with early domestication of vegetatively propagated field crops is proposed, including: mode of reproduction, yield of edible portion, ease of harvesting, defensive adaptations, timing of production and plant architecture. The archaeobotanical visibility of these syndrome traits is considered with a view to the reconstruction of the geographical and historical pathways of domestication for vegetatively propagated field crops in the past. CONCLUSIONS: Although convergent phenotypic traits are identified, none of them are ubiquitous and some are divergent. In contrast to cereals and legumes, several traits seem to represent varying degrees of plastic response to growth environment and practices of cultivation, as opposed to solely morphogenetic 'fixation'.
Authors: Xavier Perrier; Edmond De Langhe; Mark Donohue; Carol Lentfer; Luc Vrydaghs; Frédéric Bakry; Françoise Carreel; Isabelle Hippolyte; Jean-Pierre Horry; Christophe Jenny; Vincent Lebot; Ange-Marie Risterucci; Kodjo Tomekpe; Hugues Doutrelepont; Terry Ball; Jason Manwaring; Pierre de Maret; Tim Denham Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-07-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Aleese Barron; Michael Turner; Levi Beeching; Peter Bellwood; Philip Piper; Elle Grono; Rebecca Jones; Marc Oxenham; Nguyen Khanh Trung Kien; Tim Senden; Tim Denham Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Peter Turchin; Harvey Whitehouse; Sergey Gavrilets; Daniel Hoyer; Pieter François; James S Bennett; Kevin C Feeney; Peter Peregrine; Gary Feinman; Andrey Korotayev; Nikolay Kradin; Jill Levine; Jenny Reddish; Enrico Cioni; Romain Wacziarg; Gavin Mendel-Gleason; Majid Benam Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2022-06-24 Impact factor: 14.957
Authors: S Tamrat; J S Borrell; E Shiferaw; T Wondimu; S Kallow; R M Davies; J B Dickie; G W Nuraga; O White; F Woldeyes; S Demissew; P Wilkin Journal: Plant Biol (Stuttg) Date: 2022-02-08 Impact factor: 3.877
Authors: Wladimir Mardones; Carlos A Villarroel; Valentina Abarca; Kamila Urbina; Tomás A Peña; Jennifer Molinet; Roberto F Nespolo; Francisco A Cubillos Journal: Microb Biotechnol Date: 2021-03-23 Impact factor: 5.813