Literature DB >> 31903313

Dual Plating of the Distal Femur: Indications and Surgical Techniques.

Arnab Sain1, Vijay Sharma1, Kamran Farooque1, Muthukumaran V1, Kirubakaran Pattabiraman1.   

Abstract

Dual-plating of the distal femur is required in some cases to achieve stable fixation. The indications of a medial plate in addition to the lateral plate are medial supracondylar bone loss, low trans-condylar bicondylar fractures, medial Hoffa fracture, peri-prosthetic distal femur fractures, non-union after failed fixation with single lateral plate, poor bone quality and comminuted distal femur fractures (AO type C3). We recommend orthogonal plate configuration with locked plates by a single incision or dual incision approach as per surgeon choice.
Copyright © 2019, Sain et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  distal femur; dual-plating; medial plate fixation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31903313      PMCID: PMC6935741          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


Introduction and background

Supracondylar femur fractures are commonly associated with severe comminution and significant soft tissue injury. Distal femoral fractures are mostly caused by high-energy injuries, such as falling injury and traffic accidents, and fractures are often severely comminuted. Despite the recent advances in techniques and implants, the treatment of intra-articular multi-fragmentary distal femoral fractures remains a challenge. Long-term disability can occur in patients with extensive articular cartilage damage and marked comminution. Distal femur fractures in the elderly are complicated by poor bone quality (severe osteoporosis), a distal segment that is too short for adequate fixation, blood loss, malunion and non-union, and increased mortality [1-4]. Locked plating is one of the best and modern options for treating supracondylar femur fractures with relatively low failure rates. Single lateral plating of distal femur fractures was often found to have a relatively higher failure rate [2]. A medial plate in addition to lateral plating reduces the chances of failure of fixation [2]. This article will focus on the indications and techniques of using an additional medial plate fixation in fractures of the distal femur.

Review

Pre-operative planning Decision making before surgical stabilization is important. The treating surgeon should examine the injured limb to check for the soft tissue status and any distal neurovascular deficit. Also, other injuries should be ruled out. Good quality radiographs in two planes are necessary. Computed tomography of the distal femur with coronal and sagittal reformations helps in delineating fracture patterns. Proper pre-operative planning will guide towards the need for dual plating of distal femur fractures [5]. Indications for dual plating Supracondylar femur fractures were previously treated with condylar buttress plates [6]. Subsequently, fixed-angle implants, angle-blade plates, intramedullary retrograde nails, and dynamic supracondylar screws were found to have a better biomechanical design for preventing the varus collapse compared to condylar buttress plates [7,8]. Locking plates are known for having increased biomechanical resistance with the advantage of greater numbers of fixation screws in the distal femur metaphysis [9,10]. Locking plates provide increased stability and resistance to failure compared to retrograde nails in elderly patients with poor bone stock [11-13]. The additional application of a medial plate in the following circumstances may help in achieving a stable anatomically aligned reduction. Medial Supracondylar Bone Loss In distal femur fractures with extensive metaphyseal comminution, osteopenic bone and in high-energy or open fractures, there is functional loss of medial cortical buttress. In these situations, there is less chance of healing of the medial column. The addition of a medial plate helps in giving additional stability and reduces the chances of implant failure [1,14]. Rajasekaran et al. found that additional medial plating and bone grafting was needed for non-union distal femur with medial bone loss more than 2 cm (Figures 1, 2) [15].
Figure 1

Failure of fixation with a single lateral plate in a 55-year-old patient with an open fracture and medial supracondylar bone loss. Note the medial bone loss of more than 2 cm.

Figure 2

Revision with a medial plate and bone grafting.

Low Trans-condylar Bicondylar Fractures High energy injuries sometimes lead to a low horizontal trans-condylar fracture pattern which is associated with an intercondylar split. In this fracture pattern, fixation with a single lateral plate may not achieve stable fixation as sufficient screw purchase will not be possible because of the intercondylar notch. A medial buttress plate in addition to the lateral plate is helpful in this situation [5,16]. Medial Hoffa Fracture Anatomical restoration of the articular surface is necessary for comminuted distal femur fractures. In fractures with a large medial Hoffa fragment, the application of a medial neutralization plate is necessary to achieve stable fixation. This fixation provides stability in addition to interfragmentary lag screws [5]. Peri-prosthetic Distal Femur Fractures In peri-prosthetic fractures of the distal femur, dual plating offers stable fixation, especially in osteoporotic bone. This allows for early mobilization and rehabilitation. Stable fixation of peri-prosthetic fractures is necessary to avoid failures of fixation. Cicek et al. advocated dual locked plate fixation of peri-prosthetic distal femur fractures with osteoporotic bones [17]. Non-union after Failed Fixation with Single Lateral Plate There is an increased risk of non-union in patients with comminuted distal femur fractures treated with single lateral locking plate [18]. In these cases of non-union of distal femur definitive treatment involves stabilization of non-union site with an additional medial plate and bone-grafting at the non-union site [19]. Non-union with medial bone loss more than 2 cm is an indication for medial plate augmentation and bone grafting (Figures 3, 4) [15].
Figure 3

Non-union after single lateral plate fixation.

Figure 4

Revision with medial plate augmentation and bone grafting.

Poor Bone Quality In patients with distal femur fracture with osteoporotic bone, there is a high incidence of failure of fixation with a single lateral plate due to poor purchase of screw in osteoporotic bone. Metwaly and Zakaria demonstrated that dual plating in osteoporotic distal femur fractures by a single incision offers the stability of fixation with resultant early mobility and accelerated rehabilitation [20]. In the study by Todorov et al., medial augmented LISS (less invasive stabilization system) plating was found to have higher union rates compared to conventional LISS plating in osteoporotic distal femur fractures [21]. Steinberg et al. also found higher union rates with dual plating in fractures with osteoporotic bone [2]. Comminuted Distal Femur Fractures (AO type C3) In patients with AO type C3 distal femoral fractures, dual plating offers a more stable construct. Imam et al. demonstrated that dual plating fixation using anterior approach for type C3 distal femoral fractures is an efficient and safe method of management. It has several advantages such as precise exposure, easy manipulation, anatomical reduction, and stable fixation [1]. Steinberg et al. demonstrated higher rates of union with dual plating in AO type C3 distal femur fractures (Figures 5-8) [2].
Figure 5

3D CT image showing a comminuted distal femur fracture in a 35-year-old male patient.

Figure 8

Knee flexion beyond 90 degrees in the follow-up.

Surgical technique Position The patient is positioned supine on a radiolucent operating table with the knee flexed at 30 degrees. Tourniquet use depends on the surgeon and may be used in very distal fractures. The use of a lateral femoral distractor with pins placed in the femoral diaphysis and proximal tibia metaphysis facilitates fracture alignment and disimpacts intra-articular fragments. Intra-operative use of C-arm is necessary for proper plate placement and fracture reduction and alignment [5]. Approach The choice of approach depends on the surgeon. There are two approaches, the dual incision approach and the single incision approach. The dual incision approach involves placing a medial and lateral incision for exposure of fracture and articular surface [2]. The single incision approach involves the use of a single para-patellar incision (lateral or medial) for exposure of fracture and articular surface (Figure 9). Imam et al. used a single midline incision and an extended medial para-patellar approach for dual plating of type C3 distal femoral fractures [1].
Figure 9

Single-incision lateral para-patellar incision used for the dual-plating distal femur. Also, note the orthogonal plating configuration used.

Precautions Soft tissue attachments to bone fragments should be preserved to prevent any devascularisation of bone fragments. Soft tissue retractors should be used with care [5]. Choice of Implant Dual 4.5 anatomically contoured locking plates are generally used. The T-buttress plate can also be used for medial condyle fixation. Cancellous screws of 6.5 mm are preferred for intercondylar fragment fixation [5]. According to the study by El Beaino et al. dual locking plates had higher torsional stiffness than conventional non-locking plates [22]. Plate Configuration Orthogonal dual plate configuration provides more stable fixation and is biomechanically superior to dual adjacent plating for constructs fixed with either standard compression or locking plates [22]. Post-operative care Early mobilization in a protected hinged knee brace should be done. Weight-bearing is to be allowed according to radiographic and clinical examination findings at the subsequent follow-up visits. Radiographic healing is established by the union of three cortices of the bone on the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographic views of the bone. Clinical healing is confirmed by the absence of pain either with weight-bearing or with the application of stress over the injured area on examination. Malrotation is detected clinically by comparing the injured side to the normal side. Follow-up is to be continued until fracture healing and full weight-bearing [2].

Conclusions

Dual plating of distal femur fractures offers a reliable stable fixation in cases with medial supracondylar bone loss, low trans-condylar bicondylar fractures, medial Hoffa fracture, peri-prosthetic distal femur fractures, non-union after failed fixation with single lateral plate, poor bone quality and comminuted distal femur fractures (AO type C3). Single-incision or dual incision approach may be used. Orthogonal plate configuration with locked plates provides stable fixation and allows for early rehabilitation. Early mobilization is necessary to prevent joint stiffness.
  21 in total

1.  Experimental and probabilistic analysis of distal femoral periprosthetic fracture: a comparison of locking plate and intramedullary nail fixation. Part B: probabilistic investigation.

Authors:  Christina Salas; Deana Mercer; Thomas A DeCoster; Mahmoud M Reda Taha
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.763

2.  A surgical algorithm for the management of recalcitrant distal femur nonunions based on distal femoral bone stock, fracture alignment, medial void, and stability of fixation.

Authors:  Raja Bhaskara Rajasekaran; Dheenadhayalan Jayaramaraju; Dhanasekara Raja Palanisami; Devendra Agraharam; Ramesh Perumal; Arun Kamal; Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Modern retrograde intramedullary nails versus periarticular locked plates for supracondylar femur fractures after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Michael Meneghini; Brian J Keyes; Kartheek K Reddy; Dean C Maar
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Comparison of the 95-degree angled blade plate and the locking condylar plate for the treatment of distal femoral fractures.

Authors:  Heather A Vallier; Wes Immler
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Mortality after distal femur fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Philipp N Streubel; William M Ricci; Ambrose Wong; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Varus collapse of comminuted distal femur fractures after open reduction and internal fixation with a lateral condylar buttress plate.

Authors:  Brian L Davison
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2003-01

7.  Experimental and probabilistic analysis of distal femoral periprosthetic fracture: a comparison of locking plate and intramedullary nail fixation. Part A: experimental investigation.

Authors:  Christina Salas; Deana Mercer; Thomas A DeCoster; Mahmoud M Reda Taha
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.763

8.  Treatment of Distal Femur Nonunion Following Initial Fixation with a Lateral Locking Plate.

Authors:  Nabil A Ebraheim; Grant S Buchanan; Xiaochen Liu; Maxwell E Cooper; Nicholas Peters; Jacob A Hessey; Jiayong Liu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.071

9.  A double-plating approach to distal femur fracture: A clinical study.

Authors:  Ely L Steinberg; Jacov Elis; Yohai Steinberg; Moshe Salai; Tomer Ben-Tov
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Dual Plate Configurations for Femoral Shaft Fracture Fixation.

Authors:  Marc El Beaino; Randal P Morris; Ronald W Lindsey; Zbigniew Gugala
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-04-28       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Distal femoral fractures].

Authors:  S Barzen; S Buschbeck; R Hoffmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-06-20

Review 2.  Dual-Plating in Distal Femur Fracture: A Systematic Review and Limited Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sujit Kumar Tripathy; Narayan Prasad Mishra; Paulson Varghese; Sibasish Panigrahi; Prabhudev Prasad Purudappa; Akshay Goel; Ramesh Kumar Sen
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 1.033

3.  Clinical outcomes of revision with retrograde intermedullary nailing for failed plating of distal femoral fractures: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yi Yuan; Bing Luo; Qi Hao; Jun Yuan; Gang-Bo Qu; Pan-Deng Hao; Zhi-Jiang Zeng; Jia-Fu Yang; Zu-Jian Xu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  A modified anterolateral swashbuckler approach for distal femoral fractures: description and outcomes.

Authors:  Georgios Touloupakis; Stefano Ghirardelli; Emmanouil Theodorakis; Guido Antonini; Bruno Violante; Pier Francesco Indelli
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-03-14

Review 5.  Double fixation for complex distal femoral fractures.

Authors:  Karl Stoffel; Christoph Sommer; Mark Lee; Tracy Y Zhu; Karsten Schwieger; Christopher Finkemeier
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-04-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.