Literature DB >> 31903252

Predicting in-hospital rupture of type A aortic dissection using Random Forest.

Jinlin Wu1, Juntao Qiu1, Enzehua Xie1, Wenxiang Jiang1, Rui Zhao1, Jiawei Qiu1, Mohammad A Zafar2, Yan Huang3, Cuntao Yu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study is to establish prediction tools for in-hospital rupture of type A aortic dissection (TAAD) patients, to better guide emergency surgical triage and patient counselling.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 1,133 consecutive patients with TAAD from January 2010 to December 2016. The study population was divided into training and testing datasets in a 70:30 ratio for further analysis using Random Forest.
RESULTS: The Random Forest classification model was developed with the training dataset and 16 variables were confirmed as 'important': age, BMI, gender, syncope, lower limb numbness/pain, acute phase of the TAAD, BP >160 mmHg at admission; acute liver dysfunction, WBC >15×109/L, aortic size, aortic height index (AHI), periaortic hematoma, pleural effusion, brachiocephalic artery involvement, renal artery involvement, and hemopericardium. Validation of the model showed good discrimination with an AUC, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 0.994, 1.000, 0.987, 0.998 and 1.000, respectively, in the training dataset, and 0.752, 0.990, 0.514, 0.945 and 0.857, respectively, in the testing dataset.
CONCLUSIONS: An easy-to-use tool to predict in-hospital rupture for TAAD patients was developed and validated (http://47.107.228.109/). Periaortic hematoma is the strongest predictor. Simple clinical information such as syncope can be very useful in in-hospital rupture risk stratification. 2019 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Random Forest; Type A aortic dissection (TAAD); in-hospital rupture

Year:  2019        PMID: 31903252      PMCID: PMC6940214          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.10.82

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  17 in total

Review 1.  Natural history, pathogenesis, and etiology of thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections.

Authors:  M A Coady; J A Rizzo; L J Goldstein; J A Elefteriades
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.213

2.  Impact of meteorological conditions on the occurrence of acute type A aortic dissections.

Authors:  Vincent Benouaich; Pauline Soler; Pierre Antoine Gourraud; Stéphane Lopez; Hervé Rousseau; Bertrand Marcheix
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-12-15

Review 3.  Meta-Analysis of Seasonal Incidence of Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Hisato Takagi; Tomo Ando; Takuya Umemoto
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Epidemiology and clinicopathology of aortic dissection.

Authors:  I Mészáros; J Mórocz; J Szlávi; J Schmidt; L Tornóci; L Nagy; L Szép
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  The incidence and mortality of acute thoracic aortic dissection: results from a whole nation study.

Authors:  Inga H Melvinsdottir; Sigrun H Lund; Bjarni A Agnarsson; Kristinn Sigvaldason; Tomas Gudbjartsson; Arnar Geirsson
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection: increasing prevalence and improved outcomes reported in a nationwide population-based study of more than 14,000 cases from 1987 to 2002.

Authors:  Christian Olsson; Stefan Thelin; Elisabeth Ståhle; Anders Ekbom; Fredrik Granath
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Inflammation and immune response in acute aortic dissection.

Authors:  Flavia del Porto; Maria Proietta; Luigi Tritapepe; Fabio Miraldi; Angela Koverech; Patrizia Cardelli; Fabio Tabacco; Vincenzo de Santis; Andrea Vecchione; Anna Paola Mitterhofer; Italo Nofroni; Rachele Amodeo; Massimo Trappolini; Giuseppe Aliberti
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 4.709

8.  Detection of inflammation in patients with acute aortic syndrome: comparison of FDG-PET/CT imaging and serological markers of inflammation.

Authors:  H Kuehl; H Eggebrecht; T Boes; G Antoch; S Rosenbaum; S Ladd; A Bockisch; J Barkhausen; R Erbel
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Predicting in-hospital mortality in acute type B aortic dissection: evidence from International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Jip L Tolenaar; Whit Froehlich; Frederik H W Jonker; Gilbert R Upchurch; Vincenzo Rampoldi; Thomas T Tsai; Eduardo Bossone; Arturo Evangelista; Patrick O'Gara; Linda Pape; Dan Montgomery; Eric M Isselbacher; Christoph A Nienaber; Kim A Eagle; Santi Trimarchi
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  The STROCSS statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery.

Authors:  Riaz Ahmed Agha; Mimi R Borrelli; Martinique Vella-Baldacchino; Rachel Thavayogan; Dennis P Orgill
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 6.071

View more
  9 in total

1.  Analysis of immune related gene expression profiles and immune cell components in patients with Barrett esophagus.

Authors:  Lin Shi; Renwei Guo; Zhuo Chen; Ruonan Jiao; Shuangshuang Zhang; Xuanxuan Xiong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Decode a ticking time-bomb.

Authors:  Song Wan; Jun Liu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models.

Authors:  Hailang Liu; Kun Tang; Ejun Peng; Liang Wang; Ding Xia; Zhiqiang Chen
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 3.989

4.  Prediction model's establishment and validation for aortic dissection: a long way to go.

Authors:  Jinlin Wu; Cuntao Yu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.005

5.  An early aortic dissection screening model and applied research based on ensemble learning.

Authors:  Lijue Liu; Shiyang Tan; Yi Li; Jingmin Luo; Wei Zhang; Shihao Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-12

6.  Machine learning-assisted decision-support models to better predict patients with calculous pyonephrosis.

Authors:  Hailang Liu; Xinguang Wang; Kun Tang; Ejun Peng; Ding Xia; Zhiqiang Chen
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-02

7.  Nomogram to predict risk of resistance to intravenous immunoglobulin in children hospitalized with Kawasaki disease in Eastern China.

Authors:  Hongbiao Huang; Jiaqi Jiang; Xiaosong Shi; Jie Qin; Jinfeng Dong; Lei Xu; Chengcheng Huang; Ying Liu; Yiming Zheng; Miao Hou; Qin Shen; Bihe Zeng; Guanghui Qian; Fang Yang; Haitao Lv
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 4.709

8.  Solving the class imbalance problem using ensemble algorithm: application of screening for aortic dissection.

Authors:  Lijue Liu; Xiaoyu Wu; Shihao Li; Yi Li; Shiyang Tan; Yongping Bai
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Noninvasive diagnosis of AIH/PBC overlap syndrome based on prediction models.

Authors:  Kailing Wang; Yong Li; Jianfeng Pan; Huifang He; Ziyi Zhao; Yiming Guo; Xiaomei Zhang
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2022-09-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.