BACKGROUND: Tumor mutation burden (TMB) is novel biomarker of promising predict value in prediction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPis) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the distribution of TMB in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients and the impact on overall survival (OS) time are not well demonstrated. METHODS: Information regarding gene mutations and patients' survival time in advanced LUAD was downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The diversity of TMB in different EGFR-mutant types was observed and the predicted value of TMB for OS as well as other co-mutations were analyzed. The diversity of TMB was also observed in another Chinese cohort of advanced LUAD patients. RESULTS: The median TMB values of EGFR wild-type, other types of EGFR mutations, exon 19 deletions and L858R were 6.12, 5.66, 3.77 and 4.72, differences between wild-type and EGFR sensitive mutations (exon 19 deletion or L858R) were significant (P<0.001 and P<0.01). OS time of high TMB group was inferior to that of the low TMB group (24.03 months vs. not reached, P=0.0020). TMB and TP53 together will make more accurate prediction of OS in EGFR-mutant advanced LUAD patients. Distribution of TMB in another Chinese cohort had the same trend. CONCLUSIONS: In advanced LUAD patients, TMB was lower in patients with EGFR-mutant group than EGFR wild group. TMB was a negative prognostic biomarker of OS in EGFR-mutant LUAD patients, especially when TP53 was mutated together. 2019 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Tumor mutation burden (TMB) is novel biomarker of promising predict value in prediction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPis) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the distribution of TMB in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients and the impact on overall survival (OS) time are not well demonstrated. METHODS: Information regarding gene mutations and patients' survival time in advanced LUAD was downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The diversity of TMB in different EGFR-mutant types was observed and the predicted value of TMB for OS as well as other co-mutations were analyzed. The diversity of TMB was also observed in another Chinese cohort of advanced LUAD patients. RESULTS: The median TMB values of EGFR wild-type, other types of EGFR mutations, exon 19 deletions and L858R were 6.12, 5.66, 3.77 and 4.72, differences between wild-type and EGFR sensitive mutations (exon 19 deletion or L858R) were significant (P<0.001 and P<0.01). OS time of high TMB group was inferior to that of the low TMB group (24.03 months vs. not reached, P=0.0020). TMB and TP53 together will make more accurate prediction of OS in EGFR-mutant advanced LUAD patients. Distribution of TMB in another Chinese cohort had the same trend. CONCLUSIONS: In advanced LUAD patients, TMB was lower in patients with EGFR-mutant group than EGFR wild group. TMB was a negative prognostic biomarker of OS in EGFR-mutant LUAD patients, especially when TP53 was mutated together. 2019 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.
Authors: Nicolas J Llosa; Michael Cruise; Ada Tam; Elizabeth C Wicks; Elizabeth M Hechenbleikner; Janis M Taube; Richard L Blosser; Hongni Fan; Hao Wang; Brandon S Luber; Ming Zhang; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Cynthia L Sears; Robert A Anders; Drew M Pardoll; Franck Housseau Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2014-10-30 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Naiyer A Rizvi; Matthew D Hellmann; Alexandra Snyder; Pia Kvistborg; Vladimir Makarov; Jonathan J Havel; William Lee; Jianda Yuan; Phillip Wong; Teresa S Ho; Martin L Miller; Natasha Rekhtman; Andre L Moreira; Fawzia Ibrahim; Cameron Bruggeman; Billel Gasmi; Roberta Zappasodi; Yuka Maeda; Chris Sander; Edward B Garon; Taha Merghoub; Jedd D Wolchok; Ton N Schumacher; Timothy A Chan Journal: Science Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Siddhartha Devarakonda; Federico Rotolo; Ming-Sound Tsao; Irena Lanc; Elisabeth Brambilla; Ashiq Masood; Ken A Olaussen; Robert Fulton; Shingo Sakashita; Anne McLeer-Florin; Keyue Ding; Gwénaël Le Teuff; Frances A Shepherd; Jean-Pierre Pignon; Stephen L Graziano; Robert Kratzke; Jean-Charles Soria; Lesley Seymour; Ramaswamy Govindan; Stefan Michiels Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-08-14 Impact factor: 50.717
Authors: Yinjie Gao; Michelle M Stein; Matthew Kase; Amy L Cummings; Ramit Bharanikumar; Denise Lau; Edward B Garon; Sandip P Patel Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2022-07-26 Impact factor: 6.630
Authors: Péter Bayer; Robert A Gatenby; Patricia H McDonald; Derek R Duckett; Kateřina Staňková; Joel S Brown Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-01-21 Impact factor: 3.240