| Literature DB >> 31903215 |
Henry Goehlich1, Olivia Roth1, Carolin C Wendling1,2.
Abstract
Being non-lytic, filamentous phages can replicate at high frequencies and often carry virulence factors, which are important in the evolution and emergence of novel pathogens. However, their net effect on bacterial fitness remains unknown. To understand the ecology and evolution between filamentous phages and their hosts, it is important to assess (i) fitness effects of filamentous phages on their hosts and (ii) how these effects depend on the environment. To determine how the net effect on bacterial fitness by filamentous phages changes across environments, we constructed phage-bacteria infection networks at ambient 15 practical salinity units (PSU) and stressful salinities (11 and 7 PSU) using the marine bacterium, Vibrio alginolyticus and its derived filamentous phages as model system. We observed no significant difference in network structure at 15 and 11 PSU. However, at 7 PSU phages significantly reduced bacterial growth changing network structure. This pattern was mainly driven by a significant increase in bacterial susceptibility. Our findings suggest that filamentous phages decrease bacterial growth, an indirect measure of fitness in stressful environmental conditions, which might impact bacterial communities, alter horizontal gene transfer events and possibly favour the emergence of novel pathogens in environmental Vibrios.Entities:
Keywords: Vibrio; filamentous phages; phage–bacteria infection network; salinity changes
Year: 2019 PMID: 31903215 PMCID: PMC6936277 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.191669
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Figure 1.Phage–bacteria infection network (PBIN) of the consensus matrices. Rows: bacteria, columns: phages, black cells: successful infection. 15 PSU (left), 11 PSU (middle) and 7 PSU (right).
Network statistics at 15, 11 and 7 PSU of the consensus matrices. Nestedness based on the overlap and decreasing fill (NODF: 100 = perfectly nested and 0 = zero nestedness), nT: normalized temperature, indicating the deviation from the null model (less than 1 observed network is less nested than expected). Connectance: ratio of the number of successful infections relative to all possible interactions between phages and bacteria. Fill: total amount of successful infections.
| salinity (PSU) | NODF | connectance | susceptible bacteria | infecting phages | fill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 41.88 | 1.54 | 7.24 | 0.001 | 0.11 | 16 | 24 | 103 |
| 11 | 29.8 | 1.59 | 7.7 | 0.001 | 0.10 | 20 | 27 | 101 |
| 07 | 51.22 | 1.65 | 14.73 | 0.001 | 0.25 | 28 | 29 | 246 |
Figure 2.Comparison of selected network parameters at 15, 11 and 7 PSU. (a) network connectance, (b) network fill, (c) number of susceptible bacteria, (d) number of infecting phages. Significant differences are indicated by small letters.
Linear model for selected network parameters: C: network connectance, F: network fill, P: number of infecting phages, B: number of susceptible bacteria. Shown are comparisons for 11 PSU and 7 PSU relative 15 PSU (intercept). ***p < 0.001.
| estimate | s.e. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | intercept | 0.13 | 0.01 | 18.52 | 1.60 × 10−6*** |
| 11 PSU | −0.02 | 0.01 | −1.64 | 0.15 | |
| 7 PSU | 0.15 | 0.01 | 14.40 | 7.02 × 10−6*** | |
| F | intercept | 130.00 | 6.97 | 18.66 | 1.53 × 10−6*** |
| 11 PSU | −14.67 | 9.85 | −1.49 | 0.19 | |
| 7 PSU | 139.33 | 9.85 | 14.14 | 7.80 × 10−6*** | |
| P | intercept | 28.33 | 0.64 | 44.39 | 8.75 × 10−9*** |
| 11 PSU | −0.33 | 0.90 | −0.37 | 0.73 | |
| 7 PSU | 0.33 | 0.90 | 0.37 | 0.73 | |
| B | intercept | 19.00 | 0.61 | 31.22 | 7.17 × 10−8*** |
| 11 PSU | 2.00 | 0.86 | 2.32 | 0.06 | |
| 7 PSU | 10.67 | 0.86 | 12.39 | 1.68 × 10−5*** |