Literature DB >> 31901957

Typologizing Stakeholder Information Use to Better Understand the Impacts of Collaborative Climate Science.

Kristin VanderMolen1, Alison M Meadow2, Alexandra Horangic2, Tamara U Wall3.   

Abstract

There is increasing interest among scholars in producing information that is useful and usable to land and natural resource managers in a changing climate. This interest has prompted transitions from scientist- to stakeholder-driven or collaborative approaches to climate science. A common indicator of successful collaboration is whether stakeholders use the information resulting from the projects in which they are engaged. However, detailed examples of how stakeholders use climate information are relatively scarce in the literature, leading to a challenge in understanding what researchers can and should expect and plan for in terms of stakeholder use of research findings. Drawing on theoretical, typological, and evaluation insights from the field of information use, we examine stakeholder use of climate information emerging from 13 collaborative climate science projects conducted in the western United States between 2012 and 2016. Three primary types of use emerge from our findings-conceptual, instrumental, and justification-reflecting common typologization of information use. Conceptual use was the most predominant. We suggest that researcher awareness of this typology can enable more systematic understanding of what project outputs stakeholders use and impacts of those outputs, giving way to new areas of inquiry and aiding in the conceptualization and design of climate information products for land and natural resource managers.

Keywords:  Climate information use; Collaborative climate science; Natural resource management; Research impacts

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31901957     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-019-01237-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  12 in total

1.  Selective utilization of social science related information by federal policy-makers.

Authors:  R F Rich
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 1.730

Review 2.  Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Simon Innvaer; Gunn Vist; Mari Trommald; Andrew Oxman
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2002-10

3.  How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers?

Authors:  John N Lavis; Dave Robertson; Jennifer M Woodside; Christopher B McLeod; Julia Abelson
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 4.  Knowledge exchange processes in organizations and policy arenas: a narrative systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Damien Contandriopoulos; Marc Lemire; Jean-Louis Denis; Emile Tremblay
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Getting evidence into policy: The need for deliberative strategies?

Authors:  Kathy Flitcroft; James Gillespie; Glenn Salkeld; Stacy Carter; Lyndal Trevena
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  A critical second look at integrated knowledge translation.

Authors:  Anita Kothari; C Nadine Wathen
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Five principles for the practice of knowledge exchange in environmental management.

Authors:  M S Reed; L C Stringer; I Fazey; A C Evely; J H J Kruijsen
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 6.789

Review 8.  The art of co-production of knowledge in environmental sciences and management: lessons from international practice.

Authors:  Ida Nadia S Djenontin; Alison M Meadow
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 9.  A review of assertions about the processes and outcomes of social learning in natural resource management.

Authors:  G Cundill; R Rodela
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 6.789

Review 10.  A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers.

Authors:  Kathryn Oliver; Simon Innvar; Theo Lorenc; Jenny Woodman; James Thomas
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  2 in total

1.  Making a Difference: Planning for Engaged Participation in Environmental Research.

Authors:  Daniel B Ferguson; Alison M Meadow; Henry P Huntington
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Tackling the Science Usability Gap in a Warming World: Co-Producing Useable Climate Information for Natural Resource Management.

Authors:  Molly S Cross; Lauren E Oakes; Heidi E Kretser; Raymond Bredehoft; Paul Dey; Anika Mahoney; Noelle Smith; Ian Tator; Jim Wasseen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.644

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.