Literature DB >> 25194520

Five principles for the practice of knowledge exchange in environmental management.

M S Reed1, L C Stringer2, I Fazey3, A C Evely4, J H J Kruijsen5.   

Abstract

This paper outlines five principles for effective practice of knowledge exchange, which when applied, have the potential to significantly enhance the impact of environmental management research, policy and practice. The paper is based on an empirical analysis of interviews with 32 researchers and stakeholders across 13 environmental management research projects, each of which included elements of knowledge co-creation and sharing in their design. The projects focused on a range of upland and catchment management issues across the UK, and included Research Council, Government and NGO funded projects. Preliminary findings were discussed with knowledge exchange professionals and academic experts to ensure the emerging principles were as broadly applicable as possible across multiple disciplines. The principles suggest that: knowledge exchange needs to be designed into research; the needs of likely research users and other stakeholders should be systematically represented in the research where possible; and long-term relationships must be built on trust and two-way dialogue between researchers and stakeholders in order to ensure effective co-generation of new knowledge. We found that the delivery of tangible benefits early on in the research process helps to ensure continued motivation and engagement of likely research users. Knowledge exchange is a flexible process that must be monitored, reflected on and continuously refined, and where possible, steps should be taken to ensure a legacy of ongoing knowledge exchange beyond initial research funding. The principles have been used to inform the design of knowledge exchange and stakeholder engagement guidelines for two international research programmes. They are able to assist researchers, decision-makers and other stakeholders working in contrasting environmental management settings to work together to co-produce new knowledge, and more effectively share and apply existing knowledge to manage environmental change.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Environmental management; Knowledge exchange; Knowledge management; Knowledge transfer; Knowledge translation; Research; Stakeholder engagement; Stakeholder participation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25194520     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  25 in total

1.  Climate Change and European Water Bodies, a Review of Existing Gaps and Future Research Needs: Findings of the ClimateWater Project.

Authors:  Monica Garnier; David M Harper; Lotta Blaskovicova; Gabriella Hancz; Georg A Janauer; Zsolt Jolánkai; Eva Lanz; Antonio Lo Porto; Monika Mándoki; Beata Pataki; Jean-Luc Rahuel; Victoria J Robinson; Chris Stoate; Eszter Tóth; Géza Jolánkai
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Knowledge Co-production at the Research-Practice Interface: Embedded Case Studies from Urban Forestry.

Authors:  Lindsay K Campbell; Erika S Svendsen; Lara A Roman
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  A Path to Actionable Climate Science: Perspectives from the Field.

Authors:  Nicole M DeCrappeo; Gustavo A Bisbal; Alison M Meadow
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 4.  The art of co-production of knowledge in environmental sciences and management: lessons from international practice.

Authors:  Ida Nadia S Djenontin; Alison M Meadow
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Knowledge that Acts: Evaluating the Outcomes of a Knowledge Brokering Intervention in Western Australia's Ningaloo Region.

Authors:  Kelly Chapman; Fabio Boschetti; Elizabeth Fulton; Pierre Horwitz; Tod Jones; Pascal Scherrer; Geoff Syme
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Typologizing Stakeholder Information Use to Better Understand the Impacts of Collaborative Climate Science.

Authors:  Kristin VanderMolen; Alison M Meadow; Alexandra Horangic; Tamara U Wall
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Bridging the science-practice gaps in nature-based solutions: A riverfront planning in China.

Authors:  Zhifang Wang; Liyun Huang; Min Xu; Sirui Wang
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 6.943

Review 8.  Bridging research and practice in conservation.

Authors:  Andrew N Kadykalo; Rachel T Buxton; Peter Morrison; Christine M Anderson; Holly Bickerton; Charles M Francis; Adam C Smith; Lenore Fahrig
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 7.563

9.  Bayesian Network Applications for Sustainable Holistic Water Resources Management: Modeling Opportunities for South Africa.

Authors:  Indrani Hazel Govender; Ullrika Sahlin; Gordon C O'Brien
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.302

Review 10.  The role of fire in UK peatland and moorland management: the need for informed, unbiased debate.

Authors:  G Matt Davies; Nicholas Kettridge; Cathelijne R Stoof; Alan Gray; Davide Ascoli; Paulo M Fernandes; Rob Marrs; Katherine A Allen; Stefan H Doerr; Gareth D Clay; Julia McMorrow; Vigdis Vandvik
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-05       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.