Literature DB >> 31901948

Early feeding in colorectal surgery patients: safe and cost effective.

Sarah B Jochum1, Ethan M Ritz2, Anuradha R Bhama3, Dana M Hayden3, Theodore J Saclarides3, Joanne Favuzza4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways has demonstrated improved outcomes in colorectal surgery. An important component of ERAS is early oral intake. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of early oral intake in patients following colorectal surgery.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent colectomy and proctectomy at an academic institution from January 2015 to November 2018 was performed. Postoperative outcomes were compared between patients who had postoperative day 0 (POD 0) oral intake and those who did not.
RESULTS: A total of 436 ERAS patients had oral intake timing documented. The majority of patients were women (241, 55.3%) and white (313, 71.8%). The mean age was 57 ± 15.09. Patients who had early intake were found to have lower 30-day overall morbidity and length of stay (p < 0.05), and no difference in serious adverse events. Additionally, hospital costs were lower in the POD 0 feeding group for all patients (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that early oral feeding in an established ERAS pathway is associated with improved clinical outcomes as well as decreased total hospital costs. Early postoperative feeding is safe in colorectal patients and should be prioritized to decrease complications and healthcare costs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early oral intake; Enhanced recovery

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31901948     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03500-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  21 in total

1.  AN APPRAISAL OF PARALYTIC ILEUS AND THE NECESSITY FOR POSTOPERATIVE GASTROINTESTINAL SUCTION.

Authors:  A GERBER
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1963-09

2.  Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Michel Adamina; Henrik Kehlet; George A Tomlinson; Anthony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 3.  Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation.

Authors:  H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 4.  Health economics in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs.

Authors:  Marinus D J Stowers; Daniel P Lemanu; Andrew G Hill
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  Compliance to an enhanced recovery pathway among patients with a high frailty index after major gastrointestinal surgery results in improved 30-day outcomes.

Authors:  Jessica P Hampton; Oluwafemi P Owodunni; Dianne Bettick; Sophia Y Chen; Sara Sateri; Thomas Magnuson; Susan L Gearhart
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Which fast track elements predict early recovery after colon cancer surgery?

Authors:  M S Vlug; S A L Bartels; J Wind; D T Ubbink; M W Hollmann; W A Bemelman
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Nasogastric decompression following elective colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  N J Petrelli; J P Stulc; M Rodriguez-Bigas; L Blumenson
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 0.688

8.  Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study).

Authors:  Malaika S Vlug; Jan Wind; Markus W Hollmann; Dirk T Ubbink; Huib A Cense; Alexander F Engel; Michael F Gerhards; Bart A van Wagensveld; Edwin S van der Zaag; Anna A W van Geloven; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Miguel A Cuesta; Willem A Bemelman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Cost impact analysis of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program implementation in Alberta colon cancer patients.

Authors:  G Nelson; L N Kiyang; A Chuck; N X Thanh; L M Gramlich
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy.

Authors:  M L Cheatham; W C Chapman; S P Key; J L Sawyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  5 in total

1.  Outpatient colectomy-a dream or reality?

Authors:  Stephen Campbell; Alessandro Fichera; Scott Thomas; Harry Papaconstantinou; Rahila Essani
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2021-09-16

2.  Impact of Compliance with an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program on the Outcomes Among Elderly Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fusion Surgery.

Authors:  Zhong-En Li; Shi-Bao Lu; Chao Kong; Wen-Zhi Sun; Peng Wang; Si-Tao Zhang
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 3.  Impact of Early Oral Feeding on Nasogastric Tube Reinsertion After Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Yanji Zhang; Xing Hu; Hui Wu; Shan Liang; Jing Jin; Yunjun Wu; Yao Cen; Zairong Wei; Dali Wang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-22

4.  International survey among surgeons on laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: the gap between guidelines and reality.

Authors:  Mahdi Al-Taher; Nariaki Okamoto; Didier Mutter; Laurents P S Stassen; Jacques Marescaux; Michele Diana; Bernard Dallemagne
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.453

5.  Nutrition delivery after emergency laparotomy in surgical ward: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sanna Lahtinen; Aura Ylimartimo; Juho Nurkkala; Timo Kaakinen; Merja Vakkala; Marjo Koskela; Janne Liisanantti
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 3.693

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.