| Literature DB >> 31901931 |
Xia Zhang1, Huaide Qiu2, Shouguo Liu2, Jianan Li2, Mouwang Zhou1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to develop a risk prediction model for prolonged length of stay (LOS) in stroke patients in 50 inpatient rehabilitation centers in 20 provinces across mainland China based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Generic Set case mix on admission. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this cohort study, 383 stroke patients were included from inpatient rehabilitation settings of 50 hospitals across mainland China. Independent predictors of prolonged LOS were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis. A prediction model was established and then evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. RESULTS Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the type of medical insurance and the performance of daily activities (ICF, d230) were associated with prolonged LOS (P<0.05). Age and mobility level measured by the ICF Generic Set demonstrated no significant predictive value. The prediction model showed acceptable discrimination shown by an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.699 (95% CI, 0.646-0.752) and calibration (χ²=11.66; P=0.308). CONCLUSIONS The risk prediction model for prolonged LOS in stroke patients in 50 rehabilitation centers in China, based on the ICF Generic Set, showed that the scores for the type of medical insurance and the performance of daily activities (ICF, d230) on admission were independent predictors of prolonged LOS. This prediction model may allow stakeholders to estimate the risk of prolonged LOS on admission quantitatively, facilitate the financial planning, treatment regimens during hospitalization, referral after discharge, and reimbursement.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31901931 PMCID: PMC6977619 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.918811
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Figure 1The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Generic Set theoretical framework.
Figure 2Geographical distribution of the 50 hospitals included in this study.
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) categories in the Generic Set.
| Categories | Functioning description |
|---|---|
| b130 | Energy and drive functions |
| b152 | Emotional functions |
| b280 | Sensation of pain |
| d230 | Performing daily activities |
| d450 | Walking |
| d455 | Moving around |
| d850 | Remunerative employment |
Baseline characteristics in stroke patients included in the study.
| Baseline data | N | Mean±SD | Median | Interquartile interval |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | ||||
| ≤65 years | 132 | |||
| >65 years | 251 | |||
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 277 | |||
| Female | 106 | |||
| Hemiplegic side | ||||
| Left | 201 | |||
| Right | 182 | |||
| Stroke subtype | ||||
| Hemorrhagic | 120 | |||
| Ischemic | 263 | |||
| Insurance | ||||
| Urban medical/NCMS/at own expense | 340 | |||
| Free medical service or commercial | 43 | |||
| Time after onset | 383 | 71.68±49.71 | 72 | [32, 110] |
| b130 | 383 | 4.76±3.11 | 5 | [2, 8] |
| b152 | 383 | 4.09±2.93 | 4 | [2, 6] |
| b280 | 383 | 2.39±2.69 | 2 | [0, 4] |
| d230 | 383 | 6.72±2.99 | 8 | [5, 9] |
| d450 | 383 | 7.05±3.55 | 9 | [4, 10] |
| d455 | 383 | 3.18±2.97 | 10 | [8, 10] |
| d850 | ||||
| 0 | 189 | |||
| 1–10 | 194 | |||
| Mobility | 15.23±6.14 | 18 | [11, 20] | |
| Length of stay | 22.73±9.75 | 21 | [16, 28] | |
Mobility=items d450 and d455.
NCMS – new cooperative medical scheme.
Univariate analysis of prolonged length of stay (P-LOS) (n=383).
| Baseline data | Normal LOS (n=273) | P-LOS (n=110) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | |||
| ≤65 years | 98 | 34 | 0.353 |
| >65 years | 175 | 76 | |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 199 | 78 | 0.694 |
| Female | 74 | 32 | |
| Hemiplegic side | |||
| Left | 144 | 57 | 0.869 |
| Right | 129 | 53 | |
| Stroke subtype | |||
| Hemorrhagic | 78 | 42 | 0.067 |
| Ischemic | 195 | 68 | |
| Insurance | |||
| Urban medical/NCMS/at own expense | 248 | 92 | 0.043 |
| Free medical service or commercial | 25 | 18 | |
| Time after onset | 68.36±50.09 | 73.59±53.26 | 0.575 |
| b130 | 4.45±3.09 | 5.54±3.02 | 0.002 |
| b152 | 3.76±2.93 | 4.91±2.79 | 0.001 |
| b280 | 2.28±2.67 | 2.66±2.75 | 0.217 |
| d230 | 6.15±3.15 | 8.12±1.95 | 0.000 |
| Mobility | 14.25±6.54 | 17.68±4.09 | 0.000 |
| d850 | |||
| 0 | 142 | 47 | 0.100 |
| 1–10 | 131 | 63 | |
| Length of stay (LOS) | 17.77±5.43 | 35.06±6.68 | 0.000 |
P-LOS – prolonged length of stay; NCMS – the new cooperative medical scheme.
Multivariate stepwise regression analysis for the prediction of prolonged length of stay (P-LOS).
| Model | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | P-LOS | P-LOS | P-LOS | P-LOS | |
| Age | ≤65 years | ||||
| >65 years | 1.568 | 1.572 | 1.592 | 1.618 | |
| (0.424) | (0.425) | (0.430) | (0.436) | ||
| Gender | Female | ||||
| Male | 0.841 | 0.835 | 0.819 | 0.809 | |
| (0.230) | (0.228) | (0.223) | (0.220) | ||
| Insurance | Urban medical/NCMS/at own expense | ||||
| Free medical service or commercial | 2.742 | 2.750 | 2.755 | 2.587 | |
| (1.033) | (1.035) | (1.036) | (0.962) | ||
| b130 | 0.986 | ||||
| (0.054) | |||||
| b152 | 1.061 | 1.052 | 1.051 | ||
| (0.060) | (0.048) | (0.048) | |||
| d230 | 1.252 | 1.247 | 1.307 | 1.338 | |
| (0.097) | (0.095) | (0.073) | (0.069) | ||
| Mobility | 1.032 | 1.032 | |||
| (0.038) | (0.038) | ||||
| AIC | 426.108 | 424.178 | 422.951 | 422.159 |
Values in the table were odds ratio with standard errors in parenthesis;
p<0.01,
p<0.05,
p<0.1.
NCMS – new cooperative medical scheme; AIC – Akaike information criteria.
Figure 3Nomogram for predicting prolonged length of stay (LOS) in stroke patients using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Generic Set case mix. The insurance_bi of 0 indicates urban medical insurance, new cooperative medical scheme (NCMS) or no medical insurance (patients paid their own medical costs). A value of 1 indicates free medical service or commercial insurance.
Figure 4Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to evaluate the discrimination of the prediction model.
Figure 5Calibration plot to evaluate the accuracy of the prediction model.