Francis M Lapid1, Caitlin E O'Brien1, Sapna R Kudchadkar1,2,3, Jennifer K Lee1, Elizabeth A Hunt1,2,4, Raymond C Koehler1, Donald H Shaffner1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. Division of Health Sciences Informatics, Department of Anesthesiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current pediatric resuscitation guidelines suggest that resuscitators using an advanced airway deliver 8-10 breaths per minute while carefully avoiding excessive ventilation. In the intraoperative setting, having a dedicated ventilation rescuer may be difficult because of limited personnel. Continuing pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation during resuscitation for intraoperative cardiac arrest reduces personnel needed and the risk of hyperventilation but might risk hypoventilation during chest compression delivery. AIMS: To determine whether the use of pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation at prearrest settings provides normoxia and normocarbia during resuscitation from cardiac arrest. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed combined data from preclinical randomized controlled trials. Two-week-old swine (3-4 kg) underwent asphyxia-induced cardiac arrest. Animals were resuscitated with periods of basic and advanced life support. During resuscitation, pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation was delivered at the prearrest respiratory rate, peak inspiratory pressure, and positive end-expiratory pressure. Arterial blood gases were measured prearrest, at 11 minutes of asphyxia, and at 8 and 20 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. RESULTS: Piglets (n = 154) received pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation before and during cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a peak inspiratory pressure of 14-15 cm H2 O, positive end-expiratory pressure of 4 cm H2 O, 20 breaths/minute, and an inspiratory:expiratory ratio of 1:2. During asphyxia, the arterial blood gas showed the expected severe hypercarbia and hypoxia. Continuing pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation using prearrest parameters and increasing the FiO2 to 1.0 returned the PaCO2 to prearrest levels and slightly increased the partial pressure of arterial oxygen at 8 and 20 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. CONCLUSION: In this piglet model of resuscitation from asphyxial arrest, pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation at the prearrest ventilator settings with an FiO2 of 1.0 provides adequate oxygenation and restores normocarbia. Clinical investigation is warranted to determine the benefits of continuing pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation at prearrest parameters during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
BACKGROUND: Current pediatric resuscitation guidelines suggest that resuscitators using an advanced airway deliver 8-10 breaths per minute while carefully avoiding excessive ventilation. In the intraoperative setting, having a dedicated ventilation rescuer may be difficult because of limited personnel. Continuing pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation during resuscitation for intraoperative cardiac arrest reduces personnel needed and the risk of hyperventilation but might risk hypoventilation during chest compression delivery. AIMS: To determine whether the use of pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation at prearrest settings provides normoxia and normocarbia during resuscitation from cardiac arrest. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed combined data from preclinical randomized controlled trials. Two-week-old swine (3-4 kg) underwent asphyxia-induced cardiac arrest. Animals were resuscitated with periods of basic and advanced life support. During resuscitation, pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation was delivered at the prearrest respiratory rate, peak inspiratory pressure, and positive end-expiratory pressure. Arterial blood gases were measured prearrest, at 11 minutes of asphyxia, and at 8 and 20 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. RESULTS: Piglets (n = 154) received pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation before and during cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a peak inspiratory pressure of 14-15 cm H2 O, positive end-expiratory pressure of 4 cm H2 O, 20 breaths/minute, and an inspiratory:expiratory ratio of 1:2. During asphyxia, the arterial blood gas showed the expected severe hypercarbia and hypoxia. Continuing pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation using prearrest parameters and increasing the FiO2 to 1.0 returned the PaCO2 to prearrest levels and slightly increased the partial pressure of arterial oxygen at 8 and 20 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. CONCLUSION: In this piglet model of resuscitation from asphyxial arrest, pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation at the prearrest ventilator settings with an FiO2 of 1.0 provides adequate oxygenation and restores normocarbia. Clinical investigation is warranted to determine the benefits of continuing pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation at prearrest parameters during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Authors: Charles D Deakin; Laurie J Morrison; Peter T Morley; Clifton W Callaway; Richard E Kerber; Steven L Kronick; Eric J Lavonas; Mark S Link; Robert W Neumar; Charles W Otto; Michael Parr; Michael Shuster; Kjetil Sunde; Mary Ann Peberdy; Wanchun Tang; Terry L Vanden Hoek; Bernd W Böttiger; Saul Drajer; Swee Han Lim; Jerry P Nolan Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Dianne L Atkins; Stuart Berger; Jonathan P Duff; John C Gonzales; Elizabeth A Hunt; Benny L Joyner; Peter A Meaney; Dana E Niles; Ricardo A Samson; Stephen M Schexnayder Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-11-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Steven J Weiss; Amy A Ernst; Ray Jones; Margaret Ong; Todd Filbrun; Chad Augustin; Mike Barnum; Todd G Nick Journal: South Med J Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 0.954
Authors: Jennifer L Hamrick; Justin T Hamrick; Caitlin E O'Brien; Michael Reyes; Polan T Santos; Sophie E Heitmiller; Ewa Kulikowicz; Jennifer K Lee; Sapna R Kudchadkar; Raymond C Koehler; Elizabeth A Hunt; Donald H Shaffner Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Robert Ruemmler; Alexander Ziebart; Christian Moellmann; Andreas Garcia-Bardon; Jens Kamuf; Frances Kuropka; Bastian Duenges; Erik Kristoffer Hartmann Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2018-08-31 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Tom P Aufderheide; Gardar Sigurdsson; Ronald G Pirrallo; Demetris Yannopoulos; Scott McKnite; Chris von Briesen; Christopher W Sparks; Craig J Conrad; Terry A Provo; Keith G Lurie Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-04-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sanjay M Bhananker; Chandra Ramamoorthy; Jeremy M Geiduschek; Karen L Posner; Karen B Domino; Charles M Haberkern; John S Campos; Jeffrey P Morray Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Rafael González; Lázaro Pascual; Alexandra Sava; Sara Tolón; Javier Urbano; Jesus López-Herce Journal: World J Pediatr Date: 2017-10-20 Impact factor: 2.764
Authors: Andreas Neurauter; Jon Nysaether; Jo Kramer-Johansen; Joar Eilevstjønn; Peter Paal; Helge Myklebust; Volker Wenzel; Karl H Lindner; Werner Schmölz; Morten Pytte; Petter A Steen; Hans-Ulrich Strohmenger Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2009-02-05 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Caitlin E O'Brien; Polan T Santos; Ewa Kulikowicz; Shawn Adams; Jennifer K Lee; Elizabeth A Hunt; Raymond C Koehler; Donald H Shaffner Journal: Resusc Plus Date: 2021-11-11