Literature DB >> 31900599

Cortical Excitability through Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: a Computational Approach.

Yashika Arora1, Shubhajit Roy Chowdhury2.   

Abstract

The present study analyzes the effect of various anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) configurations in terms of electric field and voltage distribution. The work aims to assess the role of tDCS configurations considering subject's specific anatomy in a computational framework. The study considers the effect of conventional and high definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) by using synthetic magnetic resonance image (MRI) volumes for normal brain and brain with multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions. The configurations presented in this study compare the effect of various m x n HD-tDCS and conventional tDCS on standard Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI152) head model which is a T1 MRI volume obtained by averaging 152 individuals at 1 mm3 resolution. The study evaluates the role of disc, ring, and pad electrodes in various configurations of tDCS application. The approximate surface area for each electrode in HD-tDCS application considered in the study is 113 mm2. The significant difference in voltage distribution has been observed due to 1 × 1 HD-tDCS configuration on synthetic MRI of normal and lesion brain using disc and ring electrodes. For region specific approach, outer ring structured electrode configuration - an extended m x n HD-tDCS configuration is presented in this study. The proposed outer ring HD-tDCS configuration has been compared with m × 1 and m × 2 HD-tDCS configurations with different types of electrodes in terms of focality, induced electric field and voltage generated. On the basis of the insights gained from the analysis of various tDCS configurations on standard, normal and lesion structural data, the design of HD-tDCS as a tool in neuro-rehabilitation has been proposed. This computational model approach is useful in fixing various parameters of current stimulation: intensity, type and arrangement of electrodes and target region by using structural MRI data of an individual prior to the real stimulation in clinical trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finite element method; Magnetic resonance imaging; Multiple sclerosis Transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31900599     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-019-1490-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  32 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive brain stimulation in Alzheimer's disease: systematic review and perspectives for the future.

Authors:  Catarina Freitas; Helena Mondragón-Llorca; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 4.032

2.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortex on corticospinal and transcallosal excitability.

Authors:  N Lang; M A Nitsche; W Paulus; J C Rothwell; R N Lemon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Transcranial direct current stimulation--update 2011.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Modeling the field distribution in deep brain stimulation: the influence of anisotropy of brain tissue.

Authors:  Christian Schmidt; Ursula van Rienen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Combining transcranial electrical stimulation with electroencephalography: a multimodal approach.

Authors:  Carlo Miniussi; Debora Brignani; Maria C Pellicciari
Journal:  Clin EEG Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 1.843

6.  MEASUREMENT OF IMPOSED VOLTAGE GRADIENT ADEQUATE TO MODULATE NEURONAL FIRING.

Authors:  C A Terzuolo; T H Bullock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1956-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Comparing cortical plasticity induced by conventional and high-definition 4 × 1 ring tDCS: a neurophysiological study.

Authors:  Hsiao-I Kuo; Marom Bikson; Abhishek Datta; Preet Minhas; Walter Paulus; Min-Fang Kuo; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 8.  Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Andre Russowsky Brunoni; Michael A Nitsche; Nadia Bolognini; Marom Bikson; Tim Wagner; Lotfi Merabet; Dylan J Edwards; Antoni Valero-Cabre; Alexander Rotenberg; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Roberta Ferrucci; Alberto Priori; Paulo Sergio Boggio; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Noninvasive imaging of head-brain conductivity profiles.

Authors:  Xiaotong Zhang; Dandan Yan; Shanan Zhu; Bin He
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct

10.  Examining transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) as a treatment for hallucinations in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jerome Brunelin; Marine Mondino; Leila Gassab; Frederic Haesebaert; Lofti Gaha; Marie-Françoise Suaud-Chagny; Mohamed Saoud; Anwar Mechri; Emmanuel Poulet
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 18.112

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Applications of open-source software ROAST in clinical studies: A review.

Authors:  Mohigul Nasimova; Yu Huang
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 9.184

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.