BACKGROUND: A number of studies have applied transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to physiologically characterize Alzheimer's disease (AD) and to monitor effects of pharmacological agents, while others have begun to therapeutically use TMS and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to improve cognitive function in AD. These applications are still very early in development, but offer the opportunity of learning from them for future development. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of all studies using noninvasive stimulation in AD and reviewed all 29 identified articles. Twenty-four focused on measures of motor cortical reactivity and (local) plasticity and functional connectivity, with eight of these studies assessing also effects of pharmacological agents. Five studies focused on the enhancement of cognitive function in AD. RESULTS: Short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI) and resting motor threshold are significantly reduced in AD patients as compared to healthy elders. Results on other measures of cortical reactivity, e.g. intracortical inhibition (ICI), are more divergent. Acetylcholine-esterase inhibitors and dopaminergic drugs may increase SAI and ICI in AD. Motor cortical plasticity and connectivity are impaired in AD. TMS/tDCS can induce acute and short-duration beneficial effects on cognitive function, but the therapeutic clinical significance in AD is unclear. Safety of TMS/tDCS is supported by studies to date. CONCLUSIONS: TMS/tDCS appears safe in AD, but longer-term risks have been insufficiently considered. TMS holds promise as a physiologic biomarker in AD to identify therapeutic targets and monitor pharmacologic effects. In addition, TMS/tDCS may have therapeutic utility in AD, though the evidence is still very preliminary and cautious interpretation is warranted. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: A number of studies have applied transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to physiologically characterize Alzheimer's disease (AD) and to monitor effects of pharmacological agents, while others have begun to therapeutically use TMS and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to improve cognitive function in AD. These applications are still very early in development, but offer the opportunity of learning from them for future development. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of all studies using noninvasive stimulation in AD and reviewed all 29 identified articles. Twenty-four focused on measures of motor cortical reactivity and (local) plasticity and functional connectivity, with eight of these studies assessing also effects of pharmacological agents. Five studies focused on the enhancement of cognitive function in AD. RESULTS: Short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI) and resting motor threshold are significantly reduced in AD patients as compared to healthy elders. Results on other measures of cortical reactivity, e.g. intracortical inhibition (ICI), are more divergent. Acetylcholine-esterase inhibitors and dopaminergic drugs may increase SAI and ICI in AD. Motor cortical plasticity and connectivity are impaired in AD. TMS/tDCS can induce acute and short-duration beneficial effects on cognitive function, but the therapeutic clinical significance in AD is unclear. Safety of TMS/tDCS is supported by studies to date. CONCLUSIONS: TMS/tDCS appears safe in AD, but longer-term risks have been insufficiently considered. TMS holds promise as a physiologic biomarker in AD to identify therapeutic targets and monitor pharmacologic effects. In addition, TMS/tDCS may have therapeutic utility in AD, though the evidence is still very preliminary and cautious interpretation is warranted. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Kaspar Schindler; Thomas Nyffeler; Roland Wiest; Martinus Hauf; Johannes Mathis; Ch W Hess; René Müri Journal: Neurosci Lett Date: 2008-02-29 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Anton Forsberg; Henry Engler; Ove Almkvist; Gunnar Blomquist; Göran Hagman; Anders Wall; Anna Ringheim; Bengt Långström; Agneta Nordberg Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2007-05-11 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Petro Julkunen; Anne M Jauhiainen; Susanna Westerén-Punnonen; Eriikka Pirinen; Hilkka Soininen; Mervi Könönen; Ari Pääkkönen; Sara Määttä; Jari Karhu Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2008-04-29 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: S Dollfus; A Larmurier-Montagne; A Razafimandimby; G Allio; J M Membrey; N Delcroix; O Etard Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2008-05-22 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Ganesh M Shankar; Shaomin Li; Tapan H Mehta; Amaya Garcia-Munoz; Nina E Shepardson; Imelda Smith; Francesca M Brett; Michael A Farrell; Michael J Rowan; Cynthia A Lemere; Ciaran M Regan; Dominic M Walsh; Bernardo L Sabatini; Dennis J Selkoe Journal: Nat Med Date: 2008-06-22 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: R Ferrucci; F Mameli; I Guidi; S Mrakic-Sposta; M Vergari; S Marceglia; F Cogiamanian; S Barbieri; E Scarpini; A Priori Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-06-04 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Tim Wagner; Uri Eden; Felipe Fregni; Antoni Valero-Cabre; Ciro Ramos-Estebanez; Valerie Pronio-Stelluto; Alan Grodzinsky; Markus Zahn; Alvaro Pascual-Leone Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2008-01-10 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: L A Farrer; L A Cupples; J L Haines; B Hyman; W A Kukull; R Mayeux; R H Myers; M A Pericak-Vance; N Risch; C M van Duijn Journal: JAMA Date: 1997 Oct 22-29 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sigrid B Sando; Stacey Melquist; Ashley Cannon; Michael L Hutton; Olav Sletvold; Ingvild Saltvedt; Linda R White; Stian Lydersen; Jan O Aasly Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2008-04-16 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: John S H Baxter; Quoc Anh Bui; Ehouarn Maguet; Stéphane Croci; Antoine Delmas; Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur; Luc Bredoux; Pierre Jannin Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2021-06-05 Impact factor: 2.924