Literature DB >> 31899216

Bioactivity screening of environmental chemicals using imaging-based high-throughput phenotypic profiling.

Johanna Nyffeler1, Clinton Willis2, Ryan Lougee1, Ann Richard3, Katie Paul-Friedman3, Joshua A Harrill4.   

Abstract

The present study adapted an existing high content imaging-based high-throughput phenotypic profiling (HTPP) assay known as "Cell Painting" for bioactivity screening of environmental chemicals. This assay uses a combination of fluorescent probes to label a variety of organelles and measures a large number of phenotypic features at the single cell level in order to detect chemical-induced changes in cell morphology. First, a small set of candidate phenotypic reference chemicals (n = 14) known to produce changes in the cellular morphology of U-2 OS cells were identified and screened at multiple time points in concentration-response format. Many of these chemicals produced distinct cellular phenotypes that were qualitatively similar to those previously described in the literature. A novel workflow for phenotypic feature extraction, concentration-response modeling and determination of in vitro thresholds for chemical bioactivity was developed. Subsequently, a set of 462 chemicals from the ToxCast library were screened in concentration-response mode. Bioactivity thresholds were calculated and converted to administered equivalent doses (AEDs) using reverse dosimetry. AEDs were then compared to effect values from mammalian toxicity studies. In many instances (68%), the HTPP-derived AEDs were either more conservative than or comparable to the in vivo effect values. Overall, we conclude that the HTPP assay can be used as an efficient, cost-effective and reproducible screening method for characterizing the biological activity and potency of environmental chemicals for potential use in in vitro-based safety assessments. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell painting; High content imaging; High-throughput profiling; ToxCast

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31899216     DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2019.114876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  13 in total

1.  Scientific Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR Panel) on testing and interpretation of comparative in vitro metabolism studies.

Authors:  Antonio F Hernandez-Jerez; Paulien Adriaanse; Annette Aldrich; Philippe Berny; Tamara Coja; Sabine Duquesne; Andreas Focks; Marina Marinovich; Maurice Millet; Olavi Pelkonen; Silvia Pieper; Aaldrik Tiktak; Christopher J Topping; Anneli Widenfalk; Martin Wilks; Gerrit Wolterink; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Jochem Louisse; Serge Rudaz; Emanuela Testai; Alfonso Lostia; Jean-Lou Dorne; Juan Manuel Parra Morte
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-12-23

Review 2.  Integration of Epigenetic Mechanisms into Non-Genotoxic Carcinogenicity Hazard Assessment: Focus on DNA Methylation and Histone Modifications.

Authors:  Daniel Desaulniers; Paule Vasseur; Abigail Jacobs; M Cecilia Aguila; Norman Ertych; Miriam N Jacobs
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Current status and future directions for a neurotoxicity hazard assessment framework that integrates in silico approaches.

Authors:  Kevin M Crofton; Arianna Bassan; Mamta Behl; Yaroslav G Chushak; Ellen Fritsche; Jeffery M Gearhart; Mary Sue Marty; Moiz Mumtaz; Manuela Pavan; Patricia Ruiz; Magdalini Sachana; Rajamani Selvam; Timothy J Shafer; Lidiya Stavitskaya; David T Szabo; Steven T Szabo; Raymond R Tice; Dan Wilson; David Woolley; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-17

4.  Cell Morphological Profiling Enables High-Throughput Screening for PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC) Phenotypic Signature.

Authors:  Maria-Anna Trapotsi; Elizabeth Mouchet; Guy Williams; Tiziana Monteverde; Karolina Juhani; Riku Turkki; Filip Miljković; Anton Martinsson; Lewis Mervin; Kenneth R Pryde; Erik Müllers; Ian Barrett; Ola Engkvist; Andreas Bender; Kevin Moreau
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Comparison of Approaches for Determining Bioactivity Hits from High-Dimensional Profiling Data.

Authors:  Johanna Nyffeler; Derik E Haggard; Clinton Willis; R Woodrow Setzer; Richard Judson; Katie Paul-Friedman; Logan J Everett; Joshua A Harrill
Journal:  SLAS Discov       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 3.341

6.  High Content Analysis Across Signaling Modulation Treatments for Subcellular Target Identification Reveals Heterogeneity in Cellular Response.

Authors:  Sayan Biswas
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-01-07

Review 7.  Image-based profiling for drug discovery: due for a machine-learning upgrade?

Authors:  Srinivas Niranj Chandrasekaran; Hugo Ceulemans; Justin D Boyd; Anne E Carpenter
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 84.694

8.  Brief Guide: Experimental Strategies for High-Quality Hit Selection from Small-Molecule Screening Campaigns.

Authors:  Ina Rothenaigner; Kamyar Hadian
Journal:  SLAS Discov       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.341

9.  Navigating the Minefield of Computational Toxicology and Informatics: Looking Back and Charting a New Horizon.

Authors:  Grace Patlewicz
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-25

10.  A phenomics approach for antiviral drug discovery.

Authors:  Jonne Rietdijk; Marianna Tampere; Aleksandra Pettke; Polina Georgiev; Maris Lapins; Ulrika Warpman-Berglund; Ola Spjuth; Marjo-Riitta Puumalainen; Jordi Carreras-Puigvert
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 7.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.