Literature DB >> 31898828

Loss of RAD9B impairs early neural development and contributes to the risk for human spina bifida.

Xuanye Cao1, Tian Tian1,2, John W Steele1,3, Robert M Cabrera1, Vanessa Aguiar-Pulido4, Shruti Wadhwa1, Nikitha Bhavani1, Patrick Bi1, Nick H Gargurevich1, Ethan N Hoffman1, Chun-Quan Cai5, Nicholas J Marini6, Wei Yang7, Gary M Shaw7, Margaret E Ross4, Richard H Finnell8, Yunping Lei1.   

Abstract

DNA damage response (DDR) genes orchestrating the network of DNA repair, cell cycle control, are essential for the rapid proliferation of neural progenitor cells. To date, the potential association between specific DDR genes and the risk of human neural tube defects (NTDs) has not been investigated. Using whole-genome sequencing and targeted sequencing, we identified significant enrichment of rare deleterious RAD9B variants in spina bifida cases compared to controls (8/409 vs. 0/298; p = .0241). Among the eight identified variants, the two frameshift mutants and p.Gln146Glu affected RAD9B nuclear localization. The two frameshift mutants also decreased the protein level of RAD9B. p.Ser354Gly, as well as the two frameshifts, affected the cell proliferation rate. Finally, p.Ser354Gly, p.Ser10Gly, p.Ile112Met, p.Gln146Glu, and the two frameshift variants showed a decreased ability for activating JNK phosphorylation. RAD9B knockdowns in human embryonic stem cells profoundly affected early differentiation through impairing PAX6 and OCT4 expression. RAD9B deficiency impeded in vitro formation of neural organoids, a 3D cell culture model for human neural development. Furthermore, the RNA-seq data revealed that loss of RAD9B dysregulates cell adhesion genes during organoid formation. These results represent the first demonstration of a DDR gene as an NTD risk factor in humans.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage response; RAD9B; spina bifida; stem cell

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31898828      PMCID: PMC7185173          DOI: 10.1002/humu.23969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.700


  40 in total

1.  VANGL2 mutations in human cranial neural-tube defects.

Authors:  Yun-Ping Lei; Ting Zhang; Hong Li; Bai-Lin Wu; Li Jin; Hong-Yan Wang
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  High-efficiency siRNA-based gene knockdown in human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Yinghong Ma; Jianyu Jin; Chunsheng Dong; Ee-Chun Cheng; Haifan Lin; Yingqun Huang; Caihong Qiu
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.942

3.  Pax6 is a human neuroectoderm cell fate determinant.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Zhang; Cindy T Huang; Jing Chen; Matthew T Pankratz; Jiajie Xi; Jin Li; Ying Yang; Timothy M Lavaute; Xue-Jun Li; Melvin Ayala; Gennadiy I Bondarenko; Zhong-Wei Du; Ying Jin; Thaddeus G Golos; Su-Chun Zhang
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 24.633

4.  Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification.

Authors:  Nicolas L Bray; Harold Pimentel; Páll Melsted; Lior Pachter
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Rad9B responds to nucleolar stress through ATR and JNK signalling, and delays the G1-S transition.

Authors:  Antonio Jesús Pérez-Castro; Raimundo Freire
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles.

Authors:  Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Inactivation of mouse Hus1 results in genomic instability and impaired responses to genotoxic stress.

Authors:  R S Weiss; T Enoch; P Leder
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  The Rad9A checkpoint protein is required for nuclear localization of the claspin adaptor protein.

Authors:  Megan L Sierant; Nicole E Archer; Scott K Davey
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Novel mutations in VANGL1 in neural tube defects.

Authors:  Zoha Kibar; Ciprian M Bosoi; Megan Kooistra; Sandra Salem; Richard H Finnell; Patrizia De Marco; Elisa Merello; Alexander G Bassuk; Valeria Capra; Philippe Gros
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.878

10.  Folate and colorectal cancer in rodents: a model of DNA repair deficiency.

Authors:  Rita Rosati; Hongzhi Ma; Diane C Cabelof
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.375

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Progress in Modeling Neural Tube Development and Defects by Organoid Reconstruction.

Authors:  Peng Li; Yongchang Chen
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 2.  Unraveling the complex genetics of neural tube defects: From biological models to human genomics and back.

Authors:  Paul Wolujewicz; John W Steele; Julia A Kaltschmidt; Richard H Finnell; Margaret Elizabeth Ross
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 3.  Micronutrient imbalance and common phenotypes in neural tube defects.

Authors:  Anneke Dixie Kakebeen; Lee Niswander
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 4.  Overview of Neural Tube Defects: Gene-Environment Interactions, Preventative Approaches and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Jasmina Isaković; Iva Šimunić; Denis Jagečić; Valentina Hribljan; Dinko Mitrečić
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-04-21

Review 5.  Closing in on Mechanisms of Open Neural Tube Defects.

Authors:  Sangmoon Lee; Joseph G Gleeson
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 6.  Environmental risks of disposable face masks during the pandemic of COVID-19: Challenges and management.

Authors:  Bing Li; Yuxiong Huang; Dengting Guo; Yuzhi Liu; Ziyi Liu; Jing-Cheng Han; Jian Zhao; Xiaoshan Zhu; Yuefei Huang; Zhenyu Wang; Baoshan Xing
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 10.753

Review 7.  Advantages of CRISPR-Cas9 combined organoid model in the study of congenital nervous system malformations.

Authors:  Li Xiaoshuai; Wang Qiushi; Wang Rui
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-02

8.  FKBP8 variants are risk factors for spina bifida.

Authors:  Tian Tian; Xuanye Cao; Sung-Eun Kim; Ying Linda Lin; John W Steele; Robert M Cabrera; Menuka Karki; Wei Yang; Nicholas J Marini; Ethan N Hoffman; Xiao Han; Cindy Hu; Linlin Wang; Bogdan J Wlodarczyk; Gary M Shaw; Aiguo Ren; Richard H Finnell; Yunping Lei
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 6.150

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.