Wei Duan-Porter1,2, Kristen Ullman3, Christina Rosebush3,4, Lauren McKenzie3, Kristine E Ensrud3,5,4, Edward Ratner5,6, Nancy Greer3, Tetyana Shippee4, Joseph E Gaugler4, Timothy J Wilt3,5. 1. Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, VAHSRD Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA. wei.duanporter@va.gov. 2. University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. wei.duanporter@va.gov. 3. Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, VAHSRD Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 4. School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 5. University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 6. Geriatric Research Education & Clinical Center, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With continued growth in the older adult population, US federal and state costs for long-term care services are projected to increase. Recent policy changes have shifted funding to home and community-based services (HCBS), but it remains unclear whether HCBS can prevent or delay long-term nursing home placement (NHP). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (OVID), Sociological Abstracts, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Embase (from inception through September 2018); and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Joanna Briggs Institute Database, AHRQ Evidence-based Practice Center, and VA Evidence Synthesis Program reports (from inception through November 2018) for English-language systematic reviews. We also sought expert referrals. Eligible reviews addressed HCBS for community-dwelling adults with, or at risk of developing, physical and/or cognitive impairments. Two individuals rated quality (using modified AMSTAR 2) and abstracted review characteristics, including definition of NHP and interventions. From a prioritized subset of the highest-quality and most recent reviews, we abstracted intervention effects and strength of evidence (as reported by review authors). RESULTS: Of 47 eligible reviews, most focused on caregiver support (n = 10), respite care and adult day programs (n = 9), case management (n = 8), and preventive home visits (n = 6). Among 20 prioritized reviews, 12 exclusively included randomized controlled trials, while the rest also included observational studies. Prioritized reviews found no overall benefit or inconsistent effects for caregiver support (n = 2), respite care and adult day programs (n = 3), case management (n = 4), and preventive home visits (n = 2). For caregiver support, case management, and preventive home visits, some reviews highlighted that a few studies of higher-intensity models reduced NHP. Reviews on other interventions (n = 9) generally found a lack of evidence examining NHP. DISCUSSION: Evidence indicated no benefit or inconsistent effects of HCBS in preventing or delaying NHP. Demonstration of substantial impacts on NHP may require longer-term studies of higher-intensity interventions that can be adapted for a variety of settings. Registration PROSPERO # CRD42018116198.
BACKGROUND: With continued growth in the older adult population, US federal and state costs for long-term care services are projected to increase. Recent policy changes have shifted funding to home and community-based services (HCBS), but it remains unclear whether HCBS can prevent or delay long-term nursing home placement (NHP). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (OVID), Sociological Abstracts, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Embase (from inception through September 2018); and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Joanna Briggs Institute Database, AHRQ Evidence-based Practice Center, and VA Evidence Synthesis Program reports (from inception through November 2018) for English-language systematic reviews. We also sought expert referrals. Eligible reviews addressed HCBS for community-dwelling adults with, or at risk of developing, physical and/or cognitive impairments. Two individuals rated quality (using modified AMSTAR 2) and abstracted review characteristics, including definition of NHP and interventions. From a prioritized subset of the highest-quality and most recent reviews, we abstracted intervention effects and strength of evidence (as reported by review authors). RESULTS: Of 47 eligible reviews, most focused on caregiver support (n = 10), respite care and adult day programs (n = 9), case management (n = 8), and preventive home visits (n = 6). Among 20 prioritized reviews, 12 exclusively included randomized controlled trials, while the rest also included observational studies. Prioritized reviews found no overall benefit or inconsistent effects for caregiver support (n = 2), respite care and adult day programs (n = 3), case management (n = 4), and preventive home visits (n = 2). For caregiver support, case management, and preventive home visits, some reviews highlighted that a few studies of higher-intensity models reduced NHP. Reviews on other interventions (n = 9) generally found a lack of evidence examining NHP. DISCUSSION: Evidence indicated no benefit or inconsistent effects of HCBS in preventing or delaying NHP. Demonstration of substantial impacts on NHP may require longer-term studies of higher-intensity interventions that can be adapted for a variety of settings. Registration PROSPERO # CRD42018116198.
Entities:
Keywords:
case management; home and community-based services; long-term care services
Authors: Henriëtte G Van der Roest; Jennifer Wenborn; Channah Pastink; Rose-Marie Dröes; Martin Orrell Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-06-11
Authors: M E Tinetti; D I Baker; G McAvay; E B Claus; P Garrett; M Gottschalk; M L Koch; K Trainor; R I Horwitz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1994-09-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Luci K Leykum; Erin P Finley; Lauren S Penney; Julie Parish Johnson; Jacqueline A Pugh; Polly H Noel Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2022-03-04 Impact factor: 3.734
Authors: Wei Duan-Porter; Kristen Ullman; Christina Rosebush; Lauren McKenzie; Kristine E Ensrud; Edward Ratner; Nancy Greer; Tetyana Shippee; Joseph E Gaugler; Timothy J Wilt Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-01-02 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Josephine C Jacobs; Todd H Wagner; Ranak Trivedi; Karl Lorenz; Courtney H Van Houtven Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2021-06-03 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Johanna de Almeida Mello; Sophie Cès; Dirk Vanneste; Thérèse Van Durme; Chantal Van Audenhove; Jean Macq; Brant Fries; Anja Declercq Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 3.921