Literature DB >> 31897740

A Convolutional Neural Network for Real Time Classification, Identification, and Labelling of Vocal Cord and Tracheal Using Laryngoscopy and Bronchoscopy Video.

Clyde Matava1,2,3, Evelina Pankiv4,5, Sam Raisbeck4,6, Monica Caldeira4,6, Fahad Alam6,5,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of artificial intelligence, including machine learning, is increasing in medicine. Use of machine learning is rising in the prediction of patient outcomes. Machine learning may also be able to enhance and augment anesthesia clinical procedures such as airway management. In this study, we sought to develop a machine learning algorithm that could classify vocal cords and tracheal airway anatomy real-time during video laryngoscopy or bronchoscopy as well as compare the performance of three novel convolutional networks for detecting vocal cords and tracheal rings.
METHODS: Following institutional approval, a clinical dataset of 775 video laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy videos was used. The dataset was divided into two categories for use for training and testing. We used three convolutional neural networks (CNNs): ResNet, Inception and MobileNet. Backpropagation and a mean squared error loss function were used to assess accuracy as well as minimize bias and variance. Following training, we assessed transferability using the generalization error of the CNN, sensitivity and specificity, average confidence error, outliers, overall confidence percentage, and frames per second for live video feeds. After the training was complete, 22 models using 0 to 25,000 steps were generated and compared.
RESULTS: The overall confidence of classification for the vocal cords and tracheal rings for ResNet, Inception and MobileNet CNNs were as follows: 0.84, 0.78, and 0.64 for vocal cords, respectively, and 0.69, 0.72, 0.54 for tracheal rings, respectively. Transfer learning following additional training resulted in improved accuracy of ResNet and Inception for identifying the vocal cords (with a confidence of 0.96 and 0.93 respectively). The two best performing CNNs, ResNet and Inception, achieved a specificity of 0.985 and 0.971, respectively, and a sensitivity of 0.865 and 0.892, respectively. Inception was able to process the live video feeds at 10 FPS while ResNet processed at 5 FPS. Both were able to pass a feasibility test of identifying vocal cords and tracheal rings in a video feed.
CONCLUSIONS: We report the development and evaluation of a CNN that can identify and classify airway anatomy in real time. This neural network demonstrates high performance. The availability of artificial intelligence may improve airway management and bronchoscopy by helping to identify key anatomy real time. Thus, potentially improving performance and outcomes during these procedures. Further, this technology may theoretically be extended to the settings of airway pathology or airway management in the hands of experienced providers. The researchers in this study are exploring the performance of this neural network in clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31897740     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-019-1481-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  8 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway.

Authors:  Michael F Aziz; Dawn Dillman; Rongwei Fu; Ansgar M Brambrink
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 2.  Video-laryngoscopes in the adult airway management: a topical review of the literature.

Authors:  P Niforopoulou; I Pantazopoulos; T Demestiha; E Koudouna; T Xanthos
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 2.105

3.  Proposal for the management of the unexpected difficult pediatric airway.

Authors:  Markus Weiss; Thomas Engelhardt
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 2.556

4.  Airway management of patients with craniofacial abnormalities: 10-year experience at a teaching hospital in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ying-Lun Chen; Kuo-Hwa Wu
Journal:  J Chin Med Assoc       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.743

5.  Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks.

Authors:  Shaoqing Ren; Kaiming He; Ross Girshick; Jian Sun
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 6.226

6.  Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia.

Authors:  T M Cook; N Woodall; C Frerk
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 7.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in children (excluding neonates).

Authors:  Ibtihal S Abdelgadir; Robert S Phillips; Davinder Singh; Michael P Moncreiff; Joanne L Lumsden
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-24

8.  Airway management complications in children with difficult tracheal intubation from the Pediatric Difficult Intubation (PeDI) registry: a prospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  John Edem Fiadjoe; Akira Nishisaki; Narasimhan Jagannathan; Agnes I Hunyady; Robert S Greenberg; Paul I Reynolds; Maria E Matuszczak; Mohamed A Rehman; David M Polaner; Peter Szmuk; Vinay M Nadkarni; Francis X McGowan; Ronald S Litman; Pete G Kovatsis
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 30.700

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  An Intelligent Augmented Reality Training Framework for Neonatal Endotracheal Intubation.

Authors:  Shang Zhao; Xiao Xiao; Qiyue Wang; Xiaoke Zhang; Wei Li; Lamia Soghier; James Hahn
Journal:  Int Symp Mix Augment Real       Date:  2020-12-14

2.  Opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence in the medical field: current application, emerging problems, and problem-solving strategies.

Authors:  Lushun Jiang; Zhe Wu; Xiaolan Xu; Yaqiong Zhan; Xuehang Jin; Li Wang; Yunqing Qiu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence assisted display in thoracic surgery: development and possibilities.

Authors:  Zhuxing Chen; Yudong Zhang; Zeping Yan; Junguo Dong; Weipeng Cai; Yongfu Ma; Jipeng Jiang; Keyao Dai; Hengrui Liang; Jianxing He
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.005

Review 4.  Artificial intelligence in clinical endoscopy: Insights in the field of videomics.

Authors:  Alberto Paderno; Francesca Gennarini; Alessandra Sordi; Claudia Montenegro; Davide Lancini; Francesca Pia Villani; Sara Moccia; Cesare Piazza
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.