C Hoeschen1. 1. Institut für Medizintechnik, Fakultät für Elektro- und Informationstechnik, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Universitätsplatz 2, 39106, Magdeburg, Deutschland. christoph.hoeschen@ovgu.de.
Abstract
CLINICAL/METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEM: In the reconstruction of three-dimensional image data, artifacts that interfere with the appraisal often occur as a result of trying to minimize the dose or due to missing data. Used iterative reconstruction methods are time-consuming and have disadvantages. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: These problems are known to occur in computed tomography (CT), cone beam CT, interventional imaging, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and nuclear medicine imaging (PET and SPECT). METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: Using techniques based on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in data analysis and data supplementation, a number of problems can be solved up to a certain extent. PERFORMANCE: The performance of the methods varies greatly. Since the generated image data usually look very good using the AI-based methods presented here while their results depend strongly on the study design, reliable comparable quantitative statements on the performance are not yet available in broad terms. EVALUATION: In principle, the methods of image reconstruction based on AI algorithms offer many possibilities for improving and optimizing three-dimensional image datasets. However, the validity strongly depends on the design of the respective study in the structure of the individual procedure. It is therefore essential to have a suitable test prior to use in clinical practice. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Before the widespread use of AI-based reconstruction methods can be recommended, it is necessary to establish meaningful test procedures that can characterize the actual performance and applicability in terms of information content and a meaningful study design during the learning phase of the algorithms.
CLINICAL/METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEM: In the reconstruction of three-dimensional image data, artifacts that interfere with the appraisal often occur as a result of trying to minimize the dose or due to missing data. Used iterative reconstruction methods are time-consuming and have disadvantages. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: These problems are known to occur in computed tomography (CT), cone beam CT, interventional imaging, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and nuclear medicine imaging (PET and SPECT). METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: Using techniques based on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in data analysis and data supplementation, a number of problems can be solved up to a certain extent. PERFORMANCE: The performance of the methods varies greatly. Since the generated image data usually look very good using the AI-based methods presented here while their results depend strongly on the study design, reliable comparable quantitative statements on the performance are not yet available in broad terms. EVALUATION: In principle, the methods of image reconstruction based on AI algorithms offer many possibilities for improving and optimizing three-dimensional image datasets. However, the validity strongly depends on the design of the respective study in the structure of the individual procedure. It is therefore essential to have a suitable test prior to use in clinical practice. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Before the widespread use of AI-based reconstruction methods can be recommended, it is necessary to establish meaningful test procedures that can characterize the actual performance and applicability in terms of information content and a meaningful study design during the learning phase of the algorithms.
Entities:
Keywords:
Computed tomography; Deep Learning; Dose reduction; Limitations; Machine Learning
Authors: Hu Chen; Yi Zhang; Mannudeep K Kalra; Feng Lin; Yang Chen; Peixi Liao; Jiliu Zhou; Ge Wang Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Martin Vallières; Emily Kay-Rivest; Léo Jean Perrin; Xavier Liem; Christophe Furstoss; Hugo J W L Aerts; Nader Khaouam; Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tan; Chang-Shu Wang; Khalil Sultanem; Jan Seuntjens; Issam El Naqa Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 4.379