| Literature DB >> 31897367 |
Sayono Sayono1, Widoyono Widoyono2, Didik Sumanto1, Rokhani Rokhani3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess community participation in Dengue virus control measures, and community satisfaction in the Dengue surveillance workers (DSWs) performance in Semarang municipality after 3 years of empowerment.Entities:
Keywords: Dengue; community; satisfaction
Year: 2019 PMID: 31897367 PMCID: PMC6927424 DOI: 10.24171/j.phrp.2019.10.6.08
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Osong Public Health Res Perspect ISSN: 2210-9099
Characteristics of the survey respondents.
| Characteristics | % | |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 210 | 20.63 |
| Female | 808 | 79.37 |
|
| ||
| Age (y) | ||
| ≤ 30 | 30 | 2.94 |
| 31 – 59 | 897 | 88.11 |
| ≥ 60 | 91 | 8.95 |
The social roles of the survey respondents.
| Social roles | % | |
|---|---|---|
| - Head of sub-district | 15 | 1.47 |
| - Social welfare staff to sub-district | 15 | 1.47 |
| - Head of PHC | 37 | 3.63 |
| - Staff of diseases prevention and control of PHC | 33 | 3.24 |
| - Head of village | 141 | 13.85 |
| - Social welfare staff to village | 140 | 13.75 |
| - Dengue vector observer to village | 28 | 2.75 |
| - Leader of FWC of sub-village | 141 | 13.85 |
| - Dengue vector observer to sub-village | 101 | 9.92 |
| - Head of FWC to Neighborhood Association | 163 | 16.01 |
| - Dengue vector observer of Neighborhood Association | 109 | 10.71 |
| - Headmaster | 95 | 9.33 |
| Total | 1,018 | 100.00 |
The participants of the survey were representatively recruited from 12 community social roles in Semarang municipality.
FWC = Family Welfare Community; PHC = Public Health Center.
The evaluation of the community perception to Dengue virus control in the Semarang municipality.
| Evaluated-aspects | % | |
|---|---|---|
| Dengue cases in the last 3 years | ||
| - Decreasing | 821 | 80.6 |
| - Stable | 156 | 15.3 |
| - Increasing | 22 | 2.2 |
| - Do not know | 19 | 1.9 |
|
| ||
| Community attention to the problems associated with Dengue virus | ||
| - Increasing | 955 | 93.8 |
| - Stable | 58 | 5.7 |
| - Decreasing | 3 | 0.3 |
| - Do not know | 2 | 0.2 |
|
| ||
| Existence of Dengue control activities by community | ||
| - Exist | 1,015 | 99.7 |
| - Not exist | 3 | 0.3 |
|
| ||
| Community participation to Dengue virus control activities | ||
| - Better | 976 | 95.9 |
| - Stable | 39 | 3.8 |
| - Do not know | 3 | 0.3 |
|
| ||
| Dengue virus vector monitoring by community (last 3 years) | ||
| - Consistent | 1,015 | 99.7 |
| - Inconsistent | 3 | 0.3 |
|
| ||
| Dengue virus vector monitoring activities (last 3 years) | ||
| - Being done routinely | 997 | 98.2 |
| - Being done intermittently | 16 | 1.6 |
| - Do not know | 2 | 0.2 |
|
| ||
| Rate of Dengue virus vector free residential areas (last 3 years) | ||
| - Increasing | 929 | 91.3 |
| - Stable | 68 | 6.7 |
| - Decreasing | 12 | 1.1 |
| - Do not know | 9 | 0.9 |
The majority of respondents had a good perception of the 7 of key performance indicators of Dengue control measures in Semarang municipality.
The evaluation of perception by the community to DSWs and their activities.
| Evaluated-aspects of DSWs and their activities | % | |
|---|---|---|
| Understand the presence of DSWs in institution or residential | ||
| - Yes | 1,010 | 99.2 |
| - No | 2 | 0.2 |
| - Do not know | 6 | 0.6 |
|
| ||
| DSWs play a role in increasing the community attention to Dengue | ||
| - Yes | 990 | 98.0 |
| - No | 16 | 1.6 |
| - Do not know | 4 | 0.4 |
|
| ||
| DSWs play a role in community participation to Dengue control program | ||
| - Yes | 980 | 97.0 |
| - No | 27 | 2.7 |
| - Do not know | 3 | 0.3 |
|
| ||
| DSWs play a role in increasing the rate of Dengue-vector free residential | ||
| - Yes | 994 | 98.4 |
| - No | 15 | 1.5 |
| - Do not know | 1 | 0.1 |
|
| ||
| DSWs play a role in reduction the Dengue occurrence | ||
| - Yes | 985 | 97.5 |
| - No | 20 | 2.0 |
| - Do not know | 5 | 0.5 |
|
| ||
| DSWs are needed in the years ahead | ||
| - Yes | 995 | 98.5 |
| - No | 9 | 0.9 |
| - Do not know | 6 | 0.6 |
The existence and activities of the DSWs were well known by the members of the community and were perceived as very good in all 6 evaluated aspects.
DSWs = Dengue surveillance workers.
The Communities’ expectations of the DSWs in the years ahead in the Semarang municipality.
| Social role of respondent | DSWs are needed in the years ahead | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Yes | No | Abstain | ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
| % | % | % | ||||
| Government officers | 372 | 98.9 | 4 | 1.1 | 0 | 0.0 |
|
| ||||||
| General members of the community | 623 | 98.3 | 5 | 0.8 | 6 | 0.9 |
|
| ||||||
| Total | 995 | 98.5 | 9 | 0.9 | 6 | 0.6 |
There was no significant difference between the respondent role and the expectations of the DSWs empowerment for the years ahead in Semarang municipality.
DSWs = Dengue surveillance workers.
The community perception towards DSWs knowledge, attitude, and abilities in implementing tasks.
| Evaluated-aspects | % | |
|---|---|---|
| DSWs’ Knowledge of Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever | ||
| - Very good | 26 | 2.6 |
| - Good | 977 | 96.7 |
| - Poor | 7 | 0.7 |
|
| ||
| Understanding of DSWs to the service areas | ||
| - Very good | 35 | 3.5 |
| - Good | 964 | 95.4 |
| - Poor | 11 | 1.1 |
|
| ||
| Maturation of DSWs attitude in related their works | ||
| - Mature | 1,000 | 99.0 |
| - Less mature | 10 | 1.0 |
|
| ||
| Confidentiality of DSWs in community service | ||
| - Confidence | 996 | 98.6 |
| - Less confidence | 14 | 1.4 |
|
| ||
| DSWs Dexterousness in larval surveys | ||
| - Skillful | 999 | 98.9 |
| - Less skillful | 11 | 1.1 |
|
| ||
| Presenting of DSWs in Dengue virus control activities by communities | ||
| - Always | 967 | 95.8 |
| - Frequent | 31 | 3.1 |
| - Rare | 12 | 1.1 |
|
| ||
| Ability of DSWs in Dengue virus control campaign | ||
| - Very good | 21 | 2.1 |
| - Good | 974 | 96.4 |
| - Poor | 15 | 1.5 |
|
| ||
| Ability of DSWs in community approach | ||
| - Very good | 30 | 3.0 |
| - Good | 970 | 95.9 |
| - Poor | 11 | 1.1 |
|
| ||
| Motivating ability of DSWs to community | ||
| - Very good | 22 | 2.7 |
| - Good | 801 | 96.0 |
| - Poor | 11 | 1.3 |
|
| ||
| DSWs attention to Dengue problem in community | ||
| - Very good | 987 | 97.8 |
| - Good | 20 | 2.0 |
| - Poor | 3 | 0.2 |
|
| ||
| Seriousness of DSWs in advocating community | ||
| - Very good | 823 | 98.7 |
| - Good | 9 | 1.1 |
| - Poor | 2 | 0.2 |
|
| ||
| Presenting of invited people to the Dengue forum held by DSWs | ||
| - Almost 100% | 24 | 2.4 |
| - More than 50% | 955 | 94.6 |
| - Less than 50% | 31 | 3.0 |
Members of the community valued knowledge, attitude, and ability of the DSWs as good/very good at implementing tasks in various Dengue control measure activities.
DSWs = Dengue surveillance workers.
Community acceptance and satisfaction in the performance of the DSWs.
| Evaluated-aspects | % | |
|---|---|---|
| Community acceptability to DSWs | ||
| - Very good | 60 | 5.9 |
| - Good | 943 | 93.4 |
| - Poor | 7 | 0.7 |
|
| ||
| Satisfaction of participant to DSWs performance | ||
| - High | 111 | 10.9 |
| - Medium | 886 | 87.0 |
| - Low | 21 | 2.1 |
Community members of Semarang Municipality have a good acceptance and satisfaction in DSWs and their implementation of Dengue control measures.
DSWs = Dengue surveillance workers.