Literature DB >> 31897217

Comparison of nodal irradiation dose using radiotherapy for patients with thoracic esophageal cancer.

Ni Zhang1, Min Gu1, Jiahao Wang1, Shixiu Wu1.   

Abstract

The present study aimed to compare incidental nodal irradiation (INI) doses using volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), 5-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (5F-IMRT) and 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) treatment plans for patients with thoracic esophageal cancer (EC). A total of 15 patients with thoracic EC were selected for participation between October 2016 and July 2017 at the Hangzhou Cancer Hospital. Regional lymph nodal stations were contoured according to 3D CT-based images of the Japan Esophageal Society Guidelines. All patients were treated with 60 Gy using VMAT, 5F-IMRT and 3D-CRT plans. Dose-volume histograms of planning target volume (PTV), lung, heart, spinal cord and incidental nodal irradiation were compared between the three plans. 5F-IMRT was superior in PTV_V95% (the volume of the PTV receiving 95% of the prescription dose, P=0.003) and the VMAT plan was best in terms of conformal index (P=0.005). V20 and V30 were reduced by 10.7-22.6% (P=0.002) and 12.8-21% (P=0.026), respectively, in normal lung tissue using the VMAT plan. 5F-IMRT demonstrated the lowest maximum dose (Dmax) for the spinal cord (P=0.037). For the INI, 3D-CRT exhibited the highest equivalent uniform dose (EUD) values for 106pre (P=0.014) and 106tb-L (P=0.03) in upper-thoracic EC. The mean EUD of all lymph nodal regions in middle-thoracic EC were >40 Gy in VMAT and 5F-IMRT plans; the VMAT plan had higher EUD values in lower-thoracic EC compared with 5F-IMRT, 3D-CRT plans for INI. VMAT were comparable to the 5F-IMRT plan with respect to dosimetric characteristics for planning and INI doses to thoracic nodal levels NO 105-112 are considerable for thoracic EC.
Copyright © 2020, Spandidos Publications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D-conformal radiotherapy; 5-field intensity- modulated radiotherapy; incidental nodal irradiation; volume-modulated arc therapy

Year:  2019        PMID: 31897217      PMCID: PMC6924155          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.11178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  28 in total

1.  Recurrence pattern of squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus after extended radical esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Satoru Nakagawa; Tatsuo Kanda; Shin-ichi Kosugi; Manabu Ohashi; Tsutomu Suzuki; Katsuyoshi Hatakeyama
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc.

Authors:  Karl Otto
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Three-dimensional conformal radiation may deliver considerable dose of incidental nodal irradiation in patients with early stage node-negative non-small cell lung cancer when the tumor is large and centrally located.

Authors:  Lujun Zhao; Ming Chen; Randall Ten Haken; Indrin Chetty; Olivier Chapet; James A Hayman; Feng-Ming Kong
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  A treatment planning study comparing volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc and fixed field IMRT for cervix uteri radiotherapy.

Authors:  Luca Cozzi; Ketayun Ardeshir Dinshaw; Shyam Kishore Shrivastava; Umesh Mahantshetty; Reena Engineer; Deepak Dattatray Deshpande; S V Jamema; Eugenio Vanetti; Alessandro Clivio; Giorgia Nicolini; Antonella Fogliata
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemoradiation outside the radiation therapy target volume: a new prognostic factor for survival in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Christina Muijs; Justin Smit; Arend Karrenbeld; Jannet Beukema; Veronique Mul; Go van Dam; Geke Hospers; Phillip Kluin; Johannes Langendijk; John Plukker
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  The effect on apparent size of simulated pulmonary nodules of using three standard CT window settings.

Authors:  K M Harris; H Adams; D C Lloyd; D J Harvey
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: is elective nodal irradiation necessary?

Authors:  Kuai-le Zhao; Jin-bo Ma; Guang Liu; Kai-liang Wu; Xue-hui Shi; Guo-liang Jiang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Treatment response and prognosis of patients after recurrence of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hideaki Shimada; Hiroyuki Kitabayashi; Yoshihiro Nabeya; Shin-ichi Okazumi; Hisahiro Matsubara; Yutaka Funami; Yukimasa Miyazawa; Tooru Shiratori; Takashi Uno; Hisao Itoh; Takenori Ochiai
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Failure patterns in patients with esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation.

Authors:  James Welsh; Stephen H Settle; Arya Amini; Lianchun Xiao; Akihiro Suzuki; Yuki Hayashi; Wayne Hofstetter; Ritsuko Komaki; Zhongxing Liao; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Does incidental irradiation with doses below 50 gy effectively reduce isolated nodal failures in non-small-cell lung cancer: dose-response relationship.

Authors:  Lucyna Kepka; Bogusław Maciejewski; Rodney H Withers
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of intensity-modulated radiation therapy on sciatic nerve injury caused by echinococcosis.

Authors:  Wan-Long Xu; Dilimulati Aikeremu; Jun-Gang Sun; Yan-Jun Zhang; Jiang-Bo Xu; Wen-Zheng Zhou; Xi-Bin Zhao; Hao Wang; Hong Yuan
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 5.135

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.