BACKGROUND: Local failure after definitive chemoradiation therapy for unresectable esophageal cancer remains problematic. Little is known about the failure pattern based on modern-day radiation treatment volumes. We hypothesized that most local failures would be within the gross tumor volume (GTV), where the bulk of the tumor burden resides. METHODS: We reviewed treatment volumes for 239 patients who underwent definitive chemoradiation therapy and compared this information with failure patterns on follow-up positron emission tomography (PET). Failures were categorized as within the GTV, the larger clinical target volume (CTV, which encompasses microscopic disease), or the still larger planning target volume (PTV, which encompasses setup variability) or outside the radiation field. RESULTS: At a median follow-up time of 52.6 months (95% confidence interval, 46.1-56.7 months), 119 patients (50%) had experienced local failure, 114 (48%) had distant failure, and 74 (31%) had no evidence of failure. Of all local failures, 107 (90%) were within the GTV, 27 (23%) were within the CTV, and 14 (12%) were within in the PTV. On multivariate analysis, GTV failure was associated with tumor status (T3/T4 vs T1/T2; odds ratio, 6.35; P = .002), change in standardized uptake value on PET before and after treatment (decrease >52%: odds ratio, 0.368; P = .003), and tumor size (>8 cm, 4.08; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Most local failures after definitive chemoradiation for unresectable esophageal cancer occur in the GTV. Future therapeutic strategies should focus on enhancing local control.
BACKGROUND:Local failure after definitive chemoradiation therapy for unresectable esophageal cancer remains problematic. Little is known about the failure pattern based on modern-day radiation treatment volumes. We hypothesized that most local failures would be within the gross tumor volume (GTV), where the bulk of the tumor burden resides. METHODS: We reviewed treatment volumes for 239 patients who underwent definitive chemoradiation therapy and compared this information with failure patterns on follow-up positron emission tomography (PET). Failures were categorized as within the GTV, the larger clinical target volume (CTV, which encompasses microscopic disease), or the still larger planning target volume (PTV, which encompasses setup variability) or outside the radiation field. RESULTS: At a median follow-up time of 52.6 months (95% confidence interval, 46.1-56.7 months), 119 patients (50%) had experienced local failure, 114 (48%) had distant failure, and 74 (31%) had no evidence of failure. Of all local failures, 107 (90%) were within the GTV, 27 (23%) were within the CTV, and 14 (12%) were within in the PTV. On multivariate analysis, GTV failure was associated with tumor status (T3/T4 vs T1/T2; odds ratio, 6.35; P = .002), change in standardized uptake value on PET before and after treatment (decrease >52%: odds ratio, 0.368; P = .003), and tumor size (>8 cm, 4.08; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Most local failures after definitive chemoradiation for unresectable esophageal cancer occur in the GTV. Future therapeutic strategies should focus on enhancing local control.
Authors: Joe Y Chang; Ritsuko Komaki; Hong Y Wen; Beth De Gracia; Jaques B Bluett; Mary F McAleer; Stephen G Swisher; Michael Gillin; Radhe Mohan; James D Cox Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-01-20 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Bruce D Minsky; Thomas F Pajak; Robert J Ginsberg; Thomas M Pisansky; James Martenson; Ritsuko Komaki; Gordon Okawara; Seth A Rosenthal; David P Kelsen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alan Pollack; Gunar K Zagars; George Starkschall; John A Antolak; J Jack Lee; Eugene Huang; Andrew C von Eschenbach; Deborah A Kuban; Isaac Rosen Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2002-08-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: L M Brown; C A Swanson; G Gridley; G M Swanson; J B Schoenberg; R S Greenberg; D T Silverman; L M Pottern; R B Hayes; A G Schwartz Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1995-01-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Elena Elimova; Xuemei Wang; Wei Qiao; Kazuki Sudo; Roopma Wadhwa; Hironori Shiozaki; Yusuke Shimodaira; Venkatram Planjery; Nikolaos Charalampakis; Jeffrey H Lee; Brian R Weston; Manoop S Bhutani; Ritsuko Komaki; David C Rice; Stephen G Swisher; Mariela A Blum; Jane E Rogers; Heath D Skinner; Dipen M Maru; Wayne L Hofstetter; Jaffer A Ajani Journal: Oncology Date: 2018-04-27 Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: Haris Zahoor; James D Luketich; Ryan M Levy; Omar Awais; Daniel G Winger; Michael K Gibson; Katie S Nason Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2014-10-14 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Jérémie Calais; Bernard Dubray; Lamyaa Nkhali; Sebastien Thureau; Charles Lemarignier; Romain Modzelewski; Isabelle Gardin; Frederic Di Fiore; Pierre Michel; Pierre Vera Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-02-14 Impact factor: 9.236