Literature DB >> 31895459

Eligibility and Preventive Potential for New Evidence-Based Cardiovascular Drugs in Secondary Prevention.

Martin Bødtker Mortensen1,2,3, Michael Joseph Blaha4, Børge Grønne Nordestgaard2,3.   

Abstract

Importance: Recently, 12 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the efficacy of novel therapies for mainly secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, given the potential overlapping eligibility of the RCTs, along with the cost of the new therapies, there are uncertainty and questions about implementing these RCT findings in real-world clinical practice. Objective: To determine the eligibility and preventive potential for these new preventive therapies in a contemporary population. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based contemporary cohort study included 6292 patients with known ischemic heart disease (IHD) and 2277 with a previous myocardial infarction (MI) enrolled between November 2003 and February 2015. Analyses were performed in the Copenhagen General Population Study with a mean (SD) of 7.7 (3.5) years of follow-up. The data were analyzed between January and October 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: We determined the drug eligibility and evidence-based potential for preventing major cardiovascular events of the 12 cardiovascular drugs tested in the following recent RCTs: IMPROVE-IT, PEGASUS, EMPA-REG, LEADER, SUSTAIN-6, FOURIER, CANVAS, REVEAL, CANTOS, COMPASS, ODYSSEY-OUTCOMES, and REDUCE-IT. The analyses were performed in patients with known IHD or with a previous MI at baseline.
Results: Of 6292 participants, 3861 (61%) were men and the mean (interquartile range) age was 69 (62-76) years. In patients with IHD or MI at baseline, eligibility for 1 or more new medications was 80% (n = 5036) and 99% (n = 2273), respectively, by meeting RCT enrollment criteria. Dividing the new therapies into 4 drug classes (lipid-modifying, antithrombotic, anti-inflammatory, and antidiabetic drugs), 2594 and 1834 patients with IHD or MI (41% and 81%, respectively) were eligible for 2 or more drug classes simultaneously. The 5-year estimated percentage of major cardiovascular events that could be prevented for each new therapy was 1% to 20% in patients with IHD or MI at baseline. Conclusions and Relevance: Most patients with known IHD or previous MI are eligible for additional new secondary prevention therapies. This raises questions for the cardiovascular community and health care authorities about access to these potentially expensive therapies, including strategies for prioritizing their use.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 31895459      PMCID: PMC6990962          DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Cardiol            Impact factor:   14.676


  5 in total

1.  Coronary artery calcium scores indicating secondary prevention level risk: Findings from the CAC consortium and FOURIER trial.

Authors:  Omar Dzaye; Alexander C Razavi; Erin D Michos; Martin Bødtker Mortensen; Zeina A Dardari; Khurram Nasir; Albert D Osei; Allison W Peng; Ron Blankstein; John H Page; Michael J Blaha
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 6.847

2.  Translating the Secondary Prevention Therapeutic Boom Into Action.

Authors:  Michael G Nanna; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 14.676

3.  Applicability of the REDUCE-IT trial to the FAST-MI registry. Are the results of randomized trials relevant in routine clinical practice?

Authors:  Jean Ferrières; Vincent Bataille; Etienne Puymirat; François Schiele; Tabassome Simon; Nicolas Danchin
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 4.  Targeting multiple domains of residual cardiovascular disease risk in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Kershaw V Patel; Muthiah Vaduganathan
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  Clinical implications of the log linear association between LDL-C lowering and cardiovascular risk reduction: Greatest benefits when LDL-C >100 mg/dl.

Authors:  Jennifer G Robinson; Manju Bengaluru Jayanna; C Noel Bairey Merz; Neil J Stone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.