| Literature DB >> 31895412 |
Gangchun Xu1,2, Chao Bian3,4, Zhijuan Nie2, Jia Li3, Yuyu Wang2, Dongpo Xu2, Xinxin You3,5, Hongbo Liu2, Jiancao Gao2, Hongxia Li2, Kai Liu2, Jian Yang2, Quanjie Li2, Nailin Shao2, Yanbing Zhuang2, Dian Fang2, Tao Jiang2, Yunyun Lv3,5, Yu Huang3,5,6, Ruobo Gu2, Junmin Xu3, Wei Ge4, Qiong Shi3,5, Pao Xu1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Seasonal migration is one of the most spectacular events in nature; however, the molecular mechanisms related to this phenomenon have not been investigated in detail. The Chinese tapertail, or Japanese grenadier anchovy, Coilia nasus, is a valuable migratory fish of high economic importance and special migratory dimorphism (with certain individuals as non-migratory residents).Entities:
Keywords: Chinese tapertail anchovy (Coilia nasus); genome and population sequencing; genome assembly; migratory dimorphism and adaptation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31895412 PMCID: PMC6939831 DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giz157
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gigascience ISSN: 2047-217X Impact factor: 6.524
Figure 1:Seasonal migration and migratory dimorphism of the Chinese tapertail anchovy. (A) A representative image of this economically important fish and geographic distribution of the collected samples along the putative migration route. The red stars represent the sample collection sites (see details in Table 1) and the green arrows indicate the direction of reproductive migration. (B) Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree constructed with genome-wide SNPs. The scale bar represents the similarity level. (C) Representative X-ray intensity maps of the Sr content in the otoliths of C. nasus. The constant blue color represents the freshwater residential pattern, while the alternative blue and green colors indicate the migratory pattern.
Summary of sample information for the genome resequencing
| Type | Locality | Sample | No. | Position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sea | Yellow Sea | S | 15 | 31.500 N, 122.400 E |
| River | Chongming | E | 15 | 31.767 N, 121.117 E |
| Nantong | 2R | 15 | 31.967 N, 120.817 E | |
| Jingjiang | 3R | 11 | 31.933 N, 120.233 E | |
| Anqing | 4R | 13 | 30.500 N, 117.067 E | |
| Lake | Hukou | 5R | 13 | 29.733 N, 116.200 E |
| Duchang | 6R | 14 | 29.233 N, 116.183 E |
Figure 2:Circos plot of the genome assembly. The rings from outside to inside indicate (A) pseudo-chromosomes, (B) a genetic map, (C) a heat map of gene density (in orange) in 100 kb of non-overlapping windows, (D) line chart of the genome GC content in 100 kb of non-overlapping windows, and (E) a heat map of repeat density (in violet) in 100 kb of non-overlapping windows. Syntenic blocks are connected with navy lines, and each line indicates 1 paralog gene pair in the assembled genome.
Figure 3:Comparison of selection sweep regions in the freshwater residential and migratory groups. (A) Distributions of ROD and Fst values in 5-kb non-overlapping windows. Red dots denote windows with the top 5% ROD and Fst values. (B) Migratory adaptation–related genes distributed on 11 chromosomes. Examples of genes (C, D) with selection sweep signals identified by πmigration/πfreshwater, Fst, and ROD values using a 5-kb sliding window. Blue and red lines represent πmigration and πfreshwater, respectively. Dashed lines denote the threshold of top 5%.
Figure 4:Three enriched Ca2+-related pathways. The genes highlighted in red were positively selected for the migratory adaptation. Green lines and arrows indicate positive regulation, and red lines, negative regulation. Interestingly, 14 of the selected genes (highlighted in red) potentially participate in the 3 critical Ca2+-related pathways, including calcium signaling pathway, MAKP signaling pathway, and Wnt signaling pathway.
Figure 5Representative mRNA transcription and protein structural changes in the selected genes with the 3 Ca2+-related pathways. (A-F) Quantitative RT-PCR validation of the mRNA transcription differences in 6 representative genes. (G) A heat map of the DEGs in the 3 Ca2+-related pathways based on the brain transcriptome. (I) Changes in the tertiary protein structure of Tgfr2.
Statistics of the genome assembly of C. nasus.
| Genome assembly | Parameter |
|---|---|
| Contig N50 (Mb) | 1.6 |
| Contig number (>100 bp) | 1,327 |
| Scaffold N50 (Mb) | 2.1 |
| Scaffold number (>100 bp) | 727 |
| Total length (Mb) | 870.0 |
| Genome coverage (×) | 404.4 |
| Longest scaffold (Mb) | 12.0 |
|
| |
| Protein-coding gene number | 20,837 |
| Mean transcript length (bp) | 16,775.5 |
| Mean exons per gene | 10.1 |
| Mean exon length (bp) | 1,759.7 |
| Mean intron length (bp) | 1,476.0 |