Literature DB >> 31895290

Muscle Failure Promotes Greater Muscle Hypertrophy in Low-Load but Not in High-Load Resistance Training.

Thiago Lasevicius1, Brad J Schoenfeld2, Carla Silva-Batista1,3, Talita de Souza Barros4, André Yui Aihara5, Helderson Brendon4, Ariel Roberth Longo4, Valmor Tricoli1, Bergson de Almeida Peres4, Emerson Luiz Teixeira1,4.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Lasevicius, T, Schoenfeld, BJ, Silva-Batista, C, Barros, TdS, Aihara, AY, Brendon, H, Longo, AR, Tricoli, V, Peres, BdA, and Teixeira, EL. Muscle failure promotes greater muscle hypertrophy in low-load but not in high-load resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 36(2): 346-351, 2022-The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of an 8-week resistance training program at low and high loads performed with and without achieving muscle failure on muscle strength and hypertrophy. Twenty-five untrained men participated in the 8-week study. Each lower limb was allocated to 1 of 4 unilateral knee extension protocols: repetitions to failure with low load (LL-RF; ∼34.4 repetitions); repetitions to failure with high load (HL-RF; ∼12.4 repetitions); repetitions not to failure with low load (LL-RNF; ∼19.6 repetitions); and repetitions not to failure with high load (HL-RNF; ∼6.7 repetitions). All conditions performed 3 sets with total training volume equated between conditions. The HL-RF and HL-RNF protocols used a load corresponding to 80% 1 repetition maximum (RM), while LL-RF and LL-RNF trained at 30% 1RM. Muscle strength (1RM) and quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA) were assessed before and after intervention. Results showed that 1RM changes were significantly higher for HL-RF (33.8%, effect size [ES]: 1.24) and HL-RNF (33.4%, ES: 1.25) in the post-test when compared with the LL-RF and LL-RNF protocols (17.7%, ES: 0.82 and 15.8%, ES: 0.89, respectively). Quadriceps CSA increased significantly for HL-RF (8.1%, ES: 0.57), HL-RNF (7.7%, ES: 0.60), and LL-RF (7.8%, ES: 0.45), whereas no significant changes were observed in the LL-RNF (2.8%, ES: 0.15). We conclude that when training with low loads, training with a high level of effort seems to have greater importance than total training volume in the accretion of muscle mass, whereas for high load training, muscle failure does not promote any additional benefits. Consistent with previous research, muscle strength gains are superior when using heavier loads.
Copyright © 2019 National Strength and Conditioning Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 31895290     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  10 in total

Review 1.  Manipulating Resistance Training Variables to Induce Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy: A Brief Narrative Review.

Authors:  Júlio Benvenutti Bueno DE Camargo; Felipe Alves Brigatto; Rafael Sakai Zaroni; Thiago Barbosa Trindade; Moisés Diego Germano; Antonio Carlos Tavares Junior; Thiago Pires DE Oliveira; Paulo Henrique Marchetti; Jonato Prestes; Charles Ricardo Lopes
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2022-07-01

2.  Do the anatomical and physiological properties of a muscle determine its adaptive response to different loading protocols?

Authors:  Brad J Schoenfeld; Andrew D Vigotsky; Jozo Grgic; Cody Haun; Bret Contreras; Kenneth Delcastillo; Aston Francis; Gilda Cote; Andrew Alto
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2020-05

3.  Muscle hypertrophy and ladder-based resistance training for rodents: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ítalo Lourenço; Walter Krause Neto; Laura Dos Santos Portella Amorim; Vagner Moraes Munhoz Ortiz; Vitor Lopes Geraldo; Gabriel Henrique da Silva Ferreira; Érico Chagas Caperuto; Eliane Florencio Gama
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2020-09

4.  Contrast Tempo of Movement and Its Effect on Power Output and Bar Velocity During Resistance Exercise.

Authors:  Michal Wilk; Jakub Jarosz; Michal Krzysztofik; Aleksandra Filip-Stachnik; Marcin Bialas; Agata Rzeszutko-Belzowska; Adam Zajac; Petr Stastny
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Effect of resistance training to muscle failure vs non-failure on strength, hypertrophy and muscle architecture in trained individuals.

Authors:  Natalia Santanielo; Sanmy R Nóbrega; Maíra C Scarpelli; Ieda F Alvarez; Gabriele B Otoboni; Lucas Pintanel; Cleiton A Libardi
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2020-07-05       Impact factor: 2.806

6.  Effects of velocity based training vs. traditional 1RM percentage-based training on improving strength, jump, linear sprint and change of direction speed performance: A Systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai-Fang Liao; Xin-Xin Wang; Meng-Yuan Han; Lin-Long Li; George P Nassis; Yong-Ming Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training in Tendon Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review on Intervention Parameters, Physiological Effects, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Ian Burton; Aisling McCormack
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-04-25

Review 8.  Effects of resistance training performed to repetition failure or non-failure on muscular strength and hypertrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jozo Grgic; Brad J Schoenfeld; John Orazem; Filip Sabol
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 13.077

Review 9.  Effects of different exercise intensity on bone mineral density in adults: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Kast; M Shojaa; M Kohl; S von Stengel; M Gosch; F Jakob; K Kerschan-Schindl; B Kladny; N Klöckner; U Lange; S Middeldorf; S Peters; D Schoene; C Sieber; F Thomasius; M Uder; W Kemmler
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 5.071

Review 10.  Returning to Play after Prolonged Training Restrictions in Professional Collision Sports.

Authors:  Keith A Stokes; Ben Jones; Mark Bennett; Graeme L Close; Nicholas Gill; James H Hull; Andreas M Kasper; Simon P T Kemp; Stephen D Mellalieu; Nicholas Peirce; Bob Stewart; Benjamin T Wall; Stephen W West; Matthew Cross
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.118

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.