Chantel Ramraj1, Ariel Pulver2,3, Patricia O'Campo2,3, Marcelo L Urquia2,3,4, Vincent Hildebrand2,5, Arjumand Siddiqi2,6. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Health Sciences Building 6th Floor, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada. chantel.ramraj@utoronto.ca. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Health Sciences Building 6th Floor, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada. 3. Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. 4. Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. 5. Department of Economics, Glendon College, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada. 6. Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The extant literature has examined social inequalities in high-risk categories of birth weight and gestational age (i.e., low birth weight and preterm birth) with little attention given to their distributional nature. As such, a scoping review was conducted to understand how researchers have conceptualized and analyzed socioeconomic inequalities in entire distributions of these birth outcomes. METHODS: Bibliographic databases were searched from their inception until August 2016 for articles from five similar, English-speaking, advanced capitalist democracies: Canada, United States, United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies were included in the review, all of which provided rationales for examining socioeconomic inequalities in the entire distribution of birth weight. Yet, only three studies examined non-uniform associations of socioeconomic factors across the distribution of birth weight using conditional quantile regression, while the majority focused on mean birth weight using descriptive analysis or linear regression to analyze inequalities. Nevertheless, study results indicated that socioeconomic inequalities exist throughout the distribution of birth weight, extending beyond the high-risk category of low birth weight. DISCUSSION: Although social inequalities in distributions of birth weight have been conceptualized, few studies have analytically engaged with this concept. As such, this review supports further investigation of distributional inequalities in birth outcomes using methodology which allows one to empirically quantify and explain differences in population risk distributions, rather than solely between infants born low birth weight or preterm birth, versus not.
INTRODUCTION: The extant literature has examined social inequalities in high-risk categories of birth weight and gestational age (i.e., low birth weight and preterm birth) with little attention given to their distributional nature. As such, a scoping review was conducted to understand how researchers have conceptualized and analyzed socioeconomic inequalities in entire distributions of these birth outcomes. METHODS: Bibliographic databases were searched from their inception until August 2016 for articles from five similar, English-speaking, advanced capitalist democracies: Canada, United States, United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies were included in the review, all of which provided rationales for examining socioeconomic inequalities in the entire distribution of birth weight. Yet, only three studies examined non-uniform associations of socioeconomic factors across the distribution of birth weight using conditional quantile regression, while the majority focused on mean birth weight using descriptive analysis or linear regression to analyze inequalities. Nevertheless, study results indicated that socioeconomic inequalities exist throughout the distribution of birth weight, extending beyond the high-risk category of low birth weight. DISCUSSION: Although social inequalities in distributions of birth weight have been conceptualized, few studies have analytically engaged with this concept. As such, this review supports further investigation of distributional inequalities in birth outcomes using methodology which allows one to empirically quantify and explain differences in population risk distributions, rather than solely between infantsborn low birth weight or preterm birth, versus not.
Entities:
Keywords:
Birth weight; Epidemiological methods; Maternal health; Social inequalities; Socio-economic
Authors: Stephen L Buka; Robert T Brennan; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Stephen W Raudenbush; Felton Earls Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2003-01-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Anne Fuller; Arjumand Siddiqi; Faraz V Shahidi; Laura N Anderson; Vincent Hildebrand; Charles D G Keown-Stoneman; Jonathon L Maguire; Catherine Birken Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-02-15 Impact factor: 2.692