Literature DB >> 31893266

The relationship of illness perceptions with demographic features, pain severity, functional capacity, disability, depression, and quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain.

Özge Ünal1, Yeşim Akyol2, Berna Tander3, Yasemin Ulus2, Yüksel Terzi4, Ömer Kuru2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship of illness perceptions (IPs) with demographic features, severity of pain, functional capacity, disability, depression, and quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2015 and July 2015, a total of 114 patients with non-specific CLBP (86 females, 28 males; mean age 47.1±15.2 years; range, 18 to 85 years) were included. Non-specific CLBP was defined as low back pain not attributable to a recognizable, known specific pathology such as infection, tumor, inflammation for ≥12 weeks. The IPs using the revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R), pain severity using the visual analog scale (VAS), functional capacity using the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), disability using the modified Oswestry Disability Index (m-ODI), depression using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and quality of life using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) were assessed.
RESULTS: There was a significant, positive correlation between the age, body mass index, duration of disease, pain scores, and IPQ-R- consequences, timeline (acute/chronic), and emotional responses subunits, whereas there was a significant, negative correlation between the IPQ-R-personal and treatment control subunits (p<0.001). The IPQ-R-timeline (acute/chronic), consequences, and emotional response subunits were positively and personal and treatment controls and illness coherence subunits were negatively correlated with the BDI and m-ODI (p<0.001). The IPQ-R-consequences and emotional responses subunits were negatively and timeline (acute/chronic), personal and treatment controls, and illness coherence subunits were positively correlated with the SF-36 subunits (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: The IPs were negatively affected by advanced age, high body mass index, longer duration of disease, and increased severity of pain in CLBP patients. Based on these findings, positive IPs may be related with reduced disability and depression, and improved quality of life and functional capacity in this patient population. Developing new strategies for improving the negative IPs of patients with CLBP may be useful.
Copyright © 2019, Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Depression; disability; illness perception; low back pain; quality of life

Year:  2019        PMID: 31893266      PMCID: PMC6935732          DOI: 10.5606/tftrd.2019.3248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 2587-1250


  34 in total

1.  ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 2.  Non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Federico Balagué; Anne F Mannion; Ferran Pellisé; Christine Cedraschi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Illness Perceptions Explain the Variance in Functional Disability, but Not Habitual Physical Activity, in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Marijke Leysen; Jo Nijs; C Paul Van Wilgen; Filip Struyf; Mira Meeus; Erik Fransen; Christophe Demoulin; Rob J E M Smeets; Nathalie A Roussel
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  Evaluation of individualized quality of life and illness perceptions in low back pain. A patient education cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  I Løchting; K Storheim; E L Werner; M Småstuen Cvancarova; M Grotle
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-06-24

Review 6.  Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Steven J Kamper; Andreas T Apeldoorn; Alessandro Chiarotto; Rob J E M Smeets; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Jaime Guzman; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-09-02

7.  Intercorrelation and test-retest reliability of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients.

Authors:  M Grönblad; M Hupli; P Wennerstrand; E Järvinen; A Lukinmaa; J P Kouri; E O Karaharju
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.442

8.  Musculoskeletal pain illness perceptions: factor structure of the Illness Perceptions Questionnaire-Revised.

Authors:  Elaine E Nicholls; Susan Hill; Nadine E Foster
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2012-08-15

Review 9.  Prevalence of chronic low back pain: systematic review.

Authors:  Rodrigo Dalke Meucci; Anaclaudia Gastal Fassa; Neice Muller Xavier Faria
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 2.106

10.  The factor structure of the Turkish version of the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) in patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Patrick Brzoska; Yüce Yilmaz-Aslan; Eda Sultanoglu; Bülent Sultanoglu; Oliver Razum
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  9 in total

1.  The impact of comorbid spinal pain in depression on work participation and clinical remission following brief or short psychotherapy. Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial with two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Marjon E A Wormgoor; Aage Indahl; Jens Egeland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Quality of life, illness perceptions, and parental lived experiences in TANGO2-related metabolic encephalopathy and arrhythmias.

Authors:  Chaya N Murali; Seema R Lalani; Mahshid S Azamian; Christina Y Miyake; Hadley Stevens Smith
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 5.351

3.  Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the 36-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Agnieszka Ćwirlej-Sozańska; Agnieszka Bejer; Agnieszka Wiśniowska-Szurlej; Anna Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska; Alessandro de Sire; Renata Spalek; Bernard Sozański
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Determinants of quality of life in individuals with chronic low back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aleena Agnus Tom; Eslavath Rajkumar; Romate John; Allen Joshua George
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2022-01-05

5.  VAS and NRS, Same or Different? Are Visual Analog Scale Values and Numerical Rating Scale Equally Viable Tools for Assessing Patients after Microdiscectomy?

Authors:  Joanna Bielewicz; Beata Daniluk; Piotr Kamieniak
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.037

6.  The correlation between illness perception, pain intensity and quality of life in elderly with low back pain in Denmark: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Elisabeth Ginnerup-Nielsen; Mette Harreby; Robin Christensen; Henning Bliddal; Marius Henriksen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 3.061

7.  Electroacupuncture for lumbar disc herniation: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuquan Shen; Qun Zhou; Leixiao Zhang; Liang Gao; Di Zhang; Xinling Wang; Yang Yu; Zhengsong Zhang; Jianjia Liu; Shumi Liang; Guilong Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Wrist ankle acupuncture in the treatment of acute lumbar sprain: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shumin Liang; Guilong Zhang; Jianhong Li; Lei Zhong; Chi Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Effect of auriculotherapy on chronic low back pain: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guilong Zhang; Leixiao Zhang; Yanli Deng; Yuquan Shen; Xinling Wang; Yang Yu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.