Wuliang Zhang1,2, Brian Meckes1,2, Chad A Mirkin1,2. 1. Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States. 2. International Institute for Nanotechnology, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States.
Abstract
Spherical nucleic acids (SNAs) are nanomaterials typically consisting of a nanoparticle core and a functional, dense, and highly oriented oligonucleotide shell with unusual biological properties that make them appealing for many applications, including sequence-specific gene silencing, mRNA quantification, and immunostimulation. When placed in biological fluids, SNAs readily interact with serum proteins, leading to the formation of ill-defined protein coronae on the surface, which can influence the targeting capabilities of the conjugate. In this work, SNAs were designed and synthesized with functional proteins, such as antibodies and serum albumin, deliberately adsorbed onto their surfaces. These particles exhibit increased resistance to protease degradation compared with native SNAs but still remain functional, as they can engage in hybridization with complementary oligonucleotides. SNAs with adsorbed targeting antibodies exhibit improved cellular selectivity within mixed cell populations. Similarly, SNAs coated with the dysopsonizing protein serum albumin show reduced macrophage uptake, providing a strategy for tailoring selective SNA delivery. Importantly, the protein coronae remain stable on the SNAs in human serum, exhibiting a less than 45% loss of protein through exchange after 12 h at 37 °C. Taken together, these results show that protein-SNA complexes and the method used to prepare them provide a new avenue for enhancing SNA stability, targeting, and biodistribution.
Spherical nucleic acids (SNAs) are nanomaterials typically consisting of a nanoparticle core and a functional, dense, and highly oriented oligonucleotide shell with unusual biological properties that make them appealing for many applications, including sequence-specific gene silencing, mRNA quantification, and immunostimulation. When placed in biological fluids, SNAs readily interact with serum proteins, leading to the formation of ill-defined protein coronae on the surface, which can influence the targeting capabilities of the conjugate. In this work, SNAs were designed and synthesized with functional proteins, such as antibodies and serum albumin, deliberately adsorbed onto their surfaces. These particles exhibit increased resistance to protease degradation compared with native SNAs but still remain functional, as they can engage in hybridization with complementary oligonucleotides. SNAs with adsorbed targeting antibodies exhibit improved cellular selectivity within mixed cell populations. Similarly, SNAs coated with the dysopsonizing protein serum albumin show reduced macrophage uptake, providing a strategy for tailoring selective SNA delivery. Importantly, the protein coronae remain stable on the SNAs in human serum, exhibiting a less than 45% loss of protein through exchange after 12 h at 37 °C. Taken together, these results show that protein-SNA complexes and the method used to prepare them provide a new avenue for enhancing SNA stability, targeting, and biodistribution.
Certain nanomaterials can carry and present
peptides, proteins,
oligonucleotides, and small molecules within highly engineered structures
to target tissues, making them appealing for biomedical and life science
applications.[1] However, many nanomaterials,
when introduced to biological fluids, nonspecifically adsorb biomolecules,
resulting in the formation of a protein corona around the structure.[2] The protein corona alters the biological stability,[3−7] biodistribution,[8,9] and targeting efficiency[10−13] of a nanomaterial, sometimes diminishing its therapeutic potential.
Though the surface charge,[14,15] size,[8,16,17] and shape[17] of a nanomaterial can modulate the composition of the protein
corona, its formation is largely unavoidable in biological environments.
Careful modification of the nanoparticle surface, however, can help
dictate protein corona formation and mediate its effects on pharmacokinetics,
yielding constructs with improved targeting capabilities[12,18−20] that sometimes exceed covalent attachment methods[12] or reduced nonspecific cellular uptake.[4,21,22]Spherical nucleic acids
(SNAs), a unique class of nanomaterials
consisting of a spherical nanoparticle core densely functionalized
with a highly oriented nucleic acid shell,[23,24] have enhanced biological properties, including increased resistance
to nuclease degradation compared with linear oligonucleotides of the
same sequence,[25] the ability to rapidly
enter cells in high quantities without transfection agents,[26,27] and tailorable immunogenicity.[28] These
properties have positioned SNAs for use in applications, such as gene
silencing,[29−32] immunomodulation,[33−35] drug delivery,[36,37] and nucleic acid detection in vitro(38−41) and in live cells.[42−46] However, SNAs, like many other nanomaterials, interact with serum
proteins, resulting in the formation of a protein corona that can
alter their uptake properties.[20] Antibody–DNA
conjugates have been hybridized onto the surface of SNAs to improve
their targeting capabilities and direct them to cancer cells.[19] However, in this approach, the antibody densities
utilized were so low (1–2 antibodies/particle) that they would
be unlikely to alter protein corona formation. Alternatively, PEGylation
of the nanoparticle core has shown the ability to reduce nonspecific
adsorption of serum proteins, thus extending blood circulation times,
but such modifications compromise SNA uptake efficiency by target
cells.[47]Herein we report a universal
method for targeting SNAs to specific
cell types. To accomplish this goal, we designed and synthesized SNAs
with predefined protein coronae consisting of functional proteins
immobilized on the oligonucleotide shell. We then explored the stability
of these structures in buffer and human serum. In addition, we studied
their ability to hybridize with complementary oligonucleotides as
well as selectively target cell populations based on molecular signatures
present on the cell surface. For example, SNAs with adsorbed human
epithelial growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs)
exhibited selectivity for HER2-positive breast cancer cells in mixed
cell cultures with HER2-negative breast cancer cells. Taken together,
our results show that this approach provides an easy, efficient, and
flexible method for controlling SNA interactions within cells that
has the potential to improve SNA stability, cell targeting, and biodistribution.
Results and Discussion
Particle Synthesis and Characterization
In order to
generate particles with defined protein coronae, we first synthesized
SNAs by functionalizing 13 nm gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) with thiolated
oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) using established synthetic methods.[23,48,49] We then incubated these SNAs
with different functional proteins, such as human epithelial growth
factor receptor 2 monoclonal antibodies (anti-HER2), immunoglobulin
G (IgG), and humanserum albumin (HSA). Each protein was selected
on the basis of its potential ability to confer specific targeting
properties to SNAs. Specifically, anti-HER2 was used as a model protein
for cell targeting because it is a clinically relevant target for
HER2-positive breast cancer.[50] IgG was
used because it is an immunogenic protein that attracts macrophages,
while HSA was explored because it can shield nanoparticles from liver
clearance and macrophage uptake.[51] After
incubating the individual proteins with the SNAs, we washed away the
loosely bound proteins by pelleting the particles via centrifugation,
leaving primarily a hard corona (defined as one with a high affinity
for a particle) adsorbed on the SNA surface.[52]To verify the formation of a hard corona, we measured the
diameter and ζ potential of the SNAs before and after incubation
with the different proteins (Figure ). Dynamic light scattering (DLS) revealed that the
average diameters of IgG-adsorbed SNAs (28.3 ± 4.1 nm), anti-HER2-adsorbed
SNAs (23.5 ± 2.1 nm), and HSA-adsorbed SNAs (19.6 ± 1.4
nm) were larger than those of the bare SNAs (15.1 ± 2.2 nm) (Figure B). Furthermore,
the SNAs with adsorbed IgG (−28.0 ± 0.6 mV) and HSA (−24.0
± 3.6 mV) displayed a more positive ζ potential compared
with bare SNAs (−35.4 ± 2.4 mV) (Figure C). Since IgG has an isoelectric point between
6.6 and 7.2 and that of HSA is 4.7, both proteins are negatively charged
at physiological pH. The shielding of the highly negatively charged
ODN by the protein coronae can contribute to the observed elevated
ζ potential. Noticeably, neither IgG nor HSA undergoes significant
conformational changes in the pH ranges used in this study.[53,54]A lack of significant change in the ζ potential of the anti-HER2-adsorbed
SNAs (−35.2 ± 0.7 mV) may be due to the charge variants
of the mAb obtained from the manufacturer, which could result in a
less positive surface charge of the mAb (the isoelectric point of
the main isoform is 8.7). Notably, charge variants of mAbs do not
seem to significantly affect their binding affinity for target receptors.[55] As further verification of protein corona formation,
we examined the electrophoretic mobility of SNAs after incubation
with proteins. All of the SNAs with protein coronae had reduced mobility
in an agarose gel compared with bare SNAs (Figure S1A), further confirming that protein adsorption occurred.
Notably, the number of DNA strands per particle did not change appreciably
upon protein adsorption, indicating that all shifts in electrophoretic
mobility were due to the protein coronae and not changes in the total
number of DNA strands (Table S2).
Figure 1
Synthesis and
characterization of protein-adsorbed SNAs. (A) Schematic
representation of monoclonal antibody (top) or IgG (bottom) immobilization
on the ODN shell of SNAs. (B) Distributions of the hydrodynamic diameters
of bare, IgG- (IgG@SNA), anti-HER2- (HER2@SNA), and HSA-immobilized
SNAs (HSA@SNA). (C) ζ potentials of bare SNAs, IgG@SNAs, HER2@SNAs,
and HSA@SNAs. (D) Schematic depicting the displacement of Texas Red-X-labeled
proteins from the surface of Cy5-labeled SNAs by serum proteins. The
fluorescence of Texas Red-X increases as protein displacement occurs.
(E) Kinetic fluorescence profiles of Texas Red-X-labeled IgG, anti-HER2,
and HSA during incubation with 10% serum proteins.
Synthesis and
characterization of protein-adsorbed SNAs. (A) Schematic
representation of monoclonal antibody (top) or IgG (bottom) immobilization
on the ODN shell of SNAs. (B) Distributions of the hydrodynamic diameters
of bare, IgG- (IgG@SNA), anti-HER2- (HER2@SNA), and HSA-immobilized
SNAs (HSA@SNA). (C) ζ potentials of bare SNAs, IgG@SNAs, HER2@SNAs,
and HSA@SNAs. (D) Schematic depicting the displacement of Texas Red-X-labeled
proteins from the surface of Cy5-labeled SNAs by serum proteins. The
fluorescence of Texas Red-X increases as protein displacement occurs.
(E) Kinetic fluorescence profiles of Texas Red-X-labeled IgG, anti-HER2,
and HSA during incubation with 10% serum proteins.Furthermore, the number of proteins adsorbed onto
each SNA was
quantified via a fluorescence-based assay using fluorophore (i.e.,
Texas Red-X)-labeled proteins. For a 13 nm AuNP functionalized with
∼140 ODNs, approximately 40 ± 2, 26 ± 2, and 23 ±
2 IgG, anti-HER2, and HSA proteins/NP were found to be adsorbed, respectively.
The reproducibility of this coating method was confirmed with HSA,
as additional separate batches yielded similar numbers of proteins
per NP (Table S3). The higher-density IgG
coating is likely due to the higher affinity of IgG for the ODN shell.The interactions driving binding of the proteins and SNAs likely
consist of both electrostatic and hydrogen-bonding interactions, which
have been reported for interactions between proteins and DNA; however,
the exact mechanisms are still unclear.[56] In our studies, increased salt concentrations (1 M NaCl, MgCl2), nonionic detergents (0.1%Triton X-100), and ethanol (1–20%)
had negligible effects on the coronae. Only harsh denaturing conditions
consisting of 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) removed the coronae.
These results suggest that there is a strong multifaceted interaction
between the proteins and SNAs.
Stability of Protein Coronae in Biological Fluids
After
establishing that we could adsorb an initial protein corona on the
SNAs, we examined the stability of the different protein coronae by
studying the exchange dynamics of proteins on the surface of SNAs
under serum-rich conditions (i.e., 10% human serum (HS)). To accomplish
this objective, we synthesized SNAs with Cy5-labeled ODNs, to which
we adsorbed proteins labeled with Texas Red-X, a fluorophore that
can transfer emitted energy to the Cy5 fluorophore on the ODN shell
when attached to the SNAs. Thus, as proteins were displaced from the
particle surface, an increase in Texas Red-X fluorescence was observed.
We incubated the SNAs in 10% HS at 37 °C and tracked the change
in fluorescence for 12 h, at which point the change in fluorescence
had plateaued (Figure E). After 12 h, we found that more than 55% of the initial corona
remained (full protein dissociation was established in 0.1% SDS),
indicating that a stable hard protein corona had formed on the SNAs.
Compared with IgG and anti-HER2, adsorbed HSA tends to dissociate
from the SNA surface even without serum, indicating its weaker affinity
for the ODN shell; the addition of serum increases the HSA desorption
by about 20%. Significantly, the stable adhesion of the functional
proteins ensures that active protein coronae are retained even in
physiologically relevant media. To assess the composition of the protein
coronae following incubation in serum, the protein-coated SNAs were
incubated in 10% HS for 4 h at 37 °C, the unbound protein was
then removed through centrifugation, and the bound protein was dissociated
using SDS. The extracted protein was then analyzed using an SDS-PAGE
gel running with Tris–glycine–SDS buffer (Figure S1B). Darker protein bands at ∼150
kDa indicate antibody enrichment for the IgG@SNAs and anti-HER2@SNAs.
Enrichment of HSA was not observed for HSA@SNAs, most likely because
of the abundance of albumin in HS. Albumin composes 50–60%
of blood plasma proteins,[57] and IgG is
about one-fifth of the albumin content.[58]We explored the characteristics of SNAs precoated with corona
proteins to ensure that they retained some of the same key biological
properties as the original SNAs that make them valuable in biology
and medicine. First, we examined their resistance to nucleases by
quantifying the amount of ODNs degraded. To measure degradation, we
synthesized SNAs with Cy5-labeled ODNs; the Cy5 dye is quenched when
the labeled strand is attached to the gold core. Upon incubation with
deoxyribonuclease I (DNase I), an endonuclease, ODNs are cleaved from
the AuNP core, resulting in increased Cy5 emission intensity. In this
experiment, preadsorption of IgG or HSA significantly reduced both
the rate and efficiency of ODN degradation, and the anti-HER2 coating
lessened the ODN degradation efficiency compared with the bare SNAs
(Figure B); this result
indicates that preadsorption of proteins enhances SNA resistance to
nucleases. This presumably occurs because of the increased steric
hindrance of the protein corona that prevents nucleases from accessing
the ODNs.
Figure 2
In vitro properties of SNAs preadsorbed with functional
proteins. (A) Schematic representation of the degradation of the ODN
shell in the presence of DNase I, in which the Cy5 fluorophore attached
to the outer shell is no longer quenched by AuNPs following protease
degradation. (B) Fluorescence kinetic profiles of the bare, IgG- (IgG@SNA),
anti-HER2- (HER2@SNA), and HSA-immobilized SNAs (HSA@SNA) with and
without DNase I treatment. (C) Schematic representation of the hybridization
of Cy3.5-labeled complementary strands to the ODNs immobilized on
AuNPs. Fluorescence is quenched as hybridization occurs. (D) Degrees
of hybridization of SNAs with complementary strands for IgG@SNAs,
HER2@SNAs, and HSA@SNAs compared with that for bare SNAs.
In vitro properties of SNAs preadsorbed with functional
proteins. (A) Schematic representation of the degradation of the ODN
shell in the presence of DNase I, in which the Cy5 fluorophore attached
to the outer shell is no longer quenched by AuNPs following protease
degradation. (B) Fluorescence kinetic profiles of the bare, IgG- (IgG@SNA),
anti-HER2- (HER2@SNA), and HSA-immobilized SNAs (HSA@SNA) with and
without DNase I treatment. (C) Schematic representation of the hybridization
of Cy3.5-labeled complementary strands to the ODNs immobilized on
AuNPs. Fluorescence is quenched as hybridization occurs. (D) Degrees
of hybridization of SNAs with complementary strands for IgG@SNAs,
HER2@SNAs, and HSA@SNAs compared with that for bare SNAs.Given that the ODNs are potentially sterically
hindered when a
protein corona is adsorbed to the structures, we examined whether
a protein corona reduced their ability to recognize complementary
binding partners, a necessary step for antisense and RNA interference
pathways as well as mRNA sensing. To assess this property, we designed
a AuNP-based fluorescence quenching assay in which the hybridization
of fluorophore-labeled (i.e., Cy3.5) strands complementary to those
making up the SNA shell results in quenching due to the proximity
of the Cy3.5 fluorophore to the AuNP core. The quenching of the Cy3.5
fluorescence by the AuNP core is an indicator of the amount of hybridization
and therefore a measure of the surface DNA accessibility (Figure C). The percentage
of DNA hybridized to protein-immobilized SNAs was calculated in comparison
with hybridization measured for protein-free SNAs and was normalized
to the hybridization of protein-free SNAs to noncomplementary (i.e.,
T20) strands. Surprisingly, we found that the preadsorbed protein
coronae decreased DNA accessibility by only ∼10% (Figure D) compared with
bare SNAs. Furthermore, when we assessed whether the most-dense protein
corona (i.e., IgG@SNA) altered the specificity, we found no apparent
increase in binding of noncomplementary strands compared to a protein-free
SNA (Figure S2). Together, these experiments
imply that the protein corona does not significantly alter recognition
of complementary strands.
Cellular Selectivity of the SNAs with Immobilized Antibodies
On a cellular level, we investigated whether we could use preadsorbed
protein coronae on SNAs to modulate their uptake by targeted cell
types. A key attribute of SNAs is that they enter nearly any cell
type (over 50 to date),[27] an especially
powerful property for many therapeutic and diagnostic applications;
however, selective targeting could impart an enhanced therapeutic
effect. As a first test, we examined the targeting capabilities of
SNAs with immobilized antibodies. For these experiments, SNAs were
synthesized with an ODN shell containing 10% Cy5-labeled strands for
flow cytometry detection, thereby minimizing potential perturbation
to the uptake pathway caused by the fluorophore. We then incubated
these constructs with either anti-HER2 mAbs or a nontargeting antibody,
IgG. We assessed the selectivity of the SNAs by treating the cocultured
breast cancer cell lines SK-BR-3 (HER2 overexpressing) and MDA-MB-231
(HER2 negative) with the particles (Figure A). Furthermore, the MDA-MB-231 cells were
engineered to express green fluorescent protein (GFP), such that the
two cell lines could be separated by flow cytometry on the basis of
GFP fluorescence intensity. Significantly, the anti-HER2-adsorbed
SNAs preferentially entered the HER2-positive cells compared with
the HER2-negative ones over an 8 h treatment time (Figure B), even under conditions with
greater numbers of HER2-negative cells (Figure S3). In contrast, nontargeting IgG-adsorbed SNAs and bare SNAs
showed no cellular selectivity. Importantly, precoating SNAs with
nontargeting proteins did not seem to reduce their cancer cell uptake
efficiency compared to that for bare SNAs (Figure C). This finding is consistent with a previous
report that mAb functionalization improves cellular selectivity,[19] but the physical adsorption of mAbs demonstrated
here is easier and more adaptable than the reported conjugation approach.
Significantly, cells were treated with mAb-adsorbed SNAs in complete
growth medium supplemented with 10% serum, and the targeting capabilities
still persisted. These conditions show that mAb-adsorbed SNAs are
able to retain cellular selectivity even in the presence of other
serum proteins.
Figure 3
Selective cellular uptake of the monoclonal HER2 antibody-adsorbed
SNAs. (A) Schematic describing the SNA treatment of the cocultured
HER2-expressing breast cancer cells, SK-BR-3, and non-HER2-expressing
breast cancer cells, MDA-MB-231. (B) Uptake profiles of anti-HER2-adsorbed
(HER2@SNA), IgG-adsorbed (IgG@SNA), and bare SNAs following incubation
for 1–8 h with the cocultured cells (solid circles, HER2-positive
cells; open circles, HER2-negative cells). MFI = median fluorescence
intensity. (C) Representative overlaid cellular uptake histograms
(as measured by Cy5 intensity) for cocultured breast cancer cells
after treatment with HER2@SNAs, IgG@SNAs, and bare SNAs for 6 h. The
distributions of Cy5 fluorescence of HER2+ cells are denoted by the
darker-shaded histograms, while those for the HER2– cells are
shown in a lighter shade.
Selective cellular uptake of the monoclonal HER2 antibody-adsorbed
SNAs. (A) Schematic describing the SNA treatment of the cocultured
HER2-expressing breast cancer cells, SK-BR-3, and non-HER2-expressing
breast cancer cells, MDA-MB-231. (B) Uptake profiles of anti-HER2-adsorbed
(HER2@SNA), IgG-adsorbed (IgG@SNA), and bare SNAs following incubation
for 1–8 h with the cocultured cells (solid circles, HER2-positive
cells; open circles, HER2-negative cells). MFI = median fluorescence
intensity. (C) Representative overlaid cellular uptake histograms
(as measured by Cy5 intensity) for cocultured breast cancer cells
after treatment with HER2@SNAs, IgG@SNAs, and bare SNAs for 6 h. The
distributions of Cy5 fluorescence of HER2+ cells are denoted by the
darker-shaded histograms, while those for the HER2– cells are
shown in a lighter shade.
Evasion of Macrophage Clearance of the Dysopsonin-Adsorbed SNAs
Lastly, we investigated the potential utility of our approach for
creating SNAs that can target or avoid macrophages, which play central
roles in immunomodulation and clearance. For this purpose, we preadsorbed
either a recognized opsonin, IgG,[59] or
a dysopsonin, HSA,[21] on the ODN shell of
SNAs and incubated them with human macrophages (Figure A). Typically, an opsonin marks a construct
as foreign and induces macrophage clearance, while dysopsonins do
the opposite.[60] To perform this experiment,
humanTHP-1 monocytes were first differentiated into macrophages using
phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (Figure S4).[61,62] We then treated the macrophages
with bare and active protein-coated SNAs for 1–8 h at 37 °C.
We hypothesized that IgG preadsorption would improve the SNA uptake
efficiency by macrophages while HSA preadsorption would reduce it.[21,63] Interestingly, both IgG and HSA adsorption lowered the uptake of
the SNAs into the macrophages, with HSA adsorption having a more significant
impact on reducing SNA clearance by macrophages (Figure B).
Figure 4
Cellular uptake of the
IgG (opsonin)- and HSA (dysopsonin)-adsorbed
SNAs. (A) Schematic describing the SNA treatment of THP-1-derived
macrophages. (B) Uptake of HSA-adsorbed (HSA@SNA), IgG-adsorbed (IgG@SNA),
and bare SNAs following 1–8 h incubation with THP-1-derived
macrophages. (C) Receptor inhibited THP-1 macrophage uptake of HSA@SNA,
IgG@SNA, and bare SNAs following pretreatment with cytochalasin D,
fucoidan, or Fc receptor blocker (FcX).
Cellular uptake of the
IgG (opsonin)- and HSA (dysopsonin)-adsorbed
SNAs. (A) Schematic describing the SNA treatment of THP-1-derived
macrophages. (B) Uptake of HSA-adsorbed (HSA@SNA), IgG-adsorbed (IgG@SNA),
and bare SNAs following 1–8 h incubation with THP-1-derived
macrophages. (C) Receptor inhibited THP-1 macrophage uptake of HSA@SNA,
IgG@SNA, and bare SNAs following pretreatment with cytochalasin D,
fucoidan, or Fc receptor blocker (FcX).IgG is an opsonin that can be cleared by macrophages
through Fc
receptor recognition,[64] while non-protein-coated
SNAs and HSA alone are reported to enter cells through scavenger receptor
A (SR-A) recognition.[65,66] Previous findings showed that
changes in protein corona composition change the cellular uptake pathway
for nanoparticles.[67] Therefore, we speculated
that coating SNAs with IgG could alter their preferred uptake pathway.
Indeed, significantly diminished uptake efficiency was observed for
these SNAs when the Fc receptors were blocked by FcX (Figure C), meaning that the IgG-coated
SNAs entered cells through a different route than observed with typical
SNAs. As a comparison, when SR-A was inhibited by fucoidan, the reduction
in the uptake efficiency of bare SNAs and HSA-immobilized SNAs is
more significant than for IgG-adsorbed SNAs. Since macrophages are
phagocytic, when phagocytosis is inhibited by cytochalasin D, the
uptake of all SNA types is suppressed. Taken together, these results
indicate that IgG immobilization alters the major cellular uptake
pathway of SNAs, which could be the reason for the overall reduction
of uptake efficiency. Significantly, HSA coating of SNAs reduces nonspecific
macrophage uptake compared with bare SNAs, opening new avenues to
explore for increasing blood circulation half-life.
Conclusions
This work has introduced a straightforward
and flexible method
for incorporating active protein coronae on SNA surfaces with relatively
high stability even in the presence of serum. Importantly, this method
increases the cellular selectivity of SNAs and reduces nonspecific
macrophage clearance without significantly affecting the accessibility
of the oligonucleotide shell. Therefore, this work points toward a
potential strategy for improving SNA targeting and distribution in vivo, which could impact ongoing clinical efforts[68] aimed at SNA therapeutic development. Finally,
looking forward, this methodology, depending upon particle surface
characteristics, could be generally applied to other nanomaterials
to improve cellular selectivity.
Authors: Samuel A Jensen; Emily S Day; Caroline H Ko; Lisa A Hurley; Janina P Luciano; Fotini M Kouri; Timothy J Merkel; Andrea J Luthi; Pinal C Patel; Joshua I Cutler; Weston L Daniel; Alexander W Scott; Matthew W Rotz; Thomas J Meade; David A Giljohann; Chad A Mirkin; Alexander H Stegh Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2013-10-30 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Yanjing Yang; Jin Huang; Xiaohai Yang; Ke Quan; He Wang; Le Ying; Nuli Xie; Min Ou; Kemin Wang Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2015-06-29 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Matthew D Massich; David A Giljohann; Dwight S Seferos; Louise E Ludlow; Curt M Horvath; Chad A Mirkin Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2009 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Ziyin Huang; Cassandra E Callmann; Shuya Wang; Matthew K Vasher; Michael Evangelopoulos; Sarah Hurst Petrosko; Chad A Mirkin Journal: ACS Cent Sci Date: 2022-05-20 Impact factor: 18.728