Zhenghong Liu1, Mingwei Ng1, Dinesh V Gunasekeran2, Huihua Li3, Kishanti Ponampalam4, R Ponampalam5. 1. SingHealth Emergency Medicine Residency Programme, Singapore Health Services, Singapore. 2. Ministry of Health Holdings, Singapore. 3. Health Services Research Unit, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. 4. University of Newcastle, Australia. 5. Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Developments in information technology (IT) have driven a push in healthcare innovation in the emergency department (ED). Many of these applications rely on mobile technology (MT) such as smartphones but not everyone is comfortable with MT usage. Our study aims to characterize the technology usage behavior of users in the ED so as to guide the implementation of IT interventions in the ED. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital. Patients and their caregivers aged 21 and above were recruited. The survey collected demographic information, technology usage patterns, and participant reported comfort level in the usage of MT. We performed descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression to identify factors differentially associated with comfort in usage of MT. RESULTS: A total of 498 participants were recruited, and 299 (60%) were patients. English was the most commonly written and read language (66.9%) and 64.2% reported a comfort level of 3/5 or more in using MT. Factors that were associated with being comfortable in using MT include having a tertiary education, being able to read and write English, as well as being a frequent user of IT. Caregivers were more likely to display these characteristics. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of ED patients are not comfortable in the usage of MT. Factors that predicted comfort level in the usage of MT were common amongst caregivers. Future interventions should take this into consideration in the design of MT interventions. Copyright:
BACKGROUND: Developments in information technology (IT) have driven a push in healthcare innovation in the emergency department (ED). Many of these applications rely on mobile technology (MT) such as smartphones but not everyone is comfortable with MT usage. Our study aims to characterize the technology usage behavior of users in the ED so as to guide the implementation of IT interventions in the ED. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital. Patients and their caregivers aged 21 and above were recruited. The survey collected demographic information, technology usage patterns, and participant reported comfort level in the usage of MT. We performed descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression to identify factors differentially associated with comfort in usage of MT. RESULTS: A total of 498 participants were recruited, and 299 (60%) were patients. English was the most commonly written and read language (66.9%) and 64.2% reported a comfort level of 3/5 or more in using MT. Factors that were associated with being comfortable in using MT include having a tertiary education, being able to read and write English, as well as being a frequent user of IT. Caregivers were more likely to display these characteristics. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of ED patients are not comfortable in the usage of MT. Factors that predicted comfort level in the usage of MT were common amongst caregivers. Future interventions should take this into consideration in the design of MT interventions. Copyright:
Authors: Ronald S Weinstein; Ana Maria Lopez; Bellal A Joseph; Kristine A Erps; Michael Holcomb; Gail P Barker; Elizabeth A Krupinski Journal: Am J Med Date: 2013-10-29 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Hilde Smith-Strøm; Jannicke Igland; Truls Østbye; Grethe S Tell; Marie F Hausken; Marit Graue; Svein Skeie; John G Cooper; Marjolein M Iversen Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Sara J Czaja; Neil Charness; Arthur D Fisk; Christopher Hertzog; Sankaran N Nair; Wendy A Rogers; Joseph Sharit Journal: Psychol Aging Date: 2006-06
Authors: Megan L Ranney; Esther K Choo; Yvonne Wang; Andrew Baum; Melissa A Clark; Michael J Mello Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: John L Semple; Sarah Sharpe; M Lucas Murnaghan; John Theodoropoulos; Kelly A Metcalfe Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 4.773
Authors: Sachiko M Oshima; Sarah D Tait; Samantha M Thomas; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Kearston Ingraham; Nadine J Barrett; E Shelley Hwang Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-06-09 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Shibani Chettri; Vivian Wang; Eli Asher Balkin; Michael F Rayo; Clara N Lee Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 4.947
Authors: Dinesh Visva Gunasekeran; Zhenghong Liu; Win Jim Tan; Joshua Koh; Chiu Peng Cheong; Lay Hong Tan; Chee Siang Lau; Gaik Kheng Phuah; Newsie Donnah A Manuel; Che Chong Chia; Gek Siang Seng; Nancy Tong; May Hang Huin; Suzette Villaluna Dulce; Susan Yap; Kishanti Ponampalam; Hao Ying; Marcus Eng Hock Ong; R Ponampalam Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 5.428