| Literature DB >> 31891660 |
Christoph Göbel1, Christian Hils2, Markus Drechsler3, Dirk Baabe4, Andreas Greiner5, Holger Schmalz5, Birgit Weber1.
Abstract
Nanoparticles of the spin-crossover coordination polymer [FeL(bipy)]n were synthesized by confined crystallization within the core of polystyrene-block-poly(4-vinylpyridine) (PS-b-P4VP) diblock copolymer micelles. The 4VP units in the micellar core act as coordination sites for the Fe complex. In the bulk material, the spin-crossover nanoparticles in the core are well isolated from each other allowing thermal treatment without disintegration of their structure. During annealing above the glass transition temperature of the PS block, the transition temperature is shifted gradually to higher temperatures from the as-synthesized product (T1/2 ↓=163 K and T1/2 ↑=170 K) to the annealed product (T1/2 ↓=203 K and T1/2 ↑=217 K) along with an increase in hysteresis width from 6 K to 14 K. Thus, the spin-crossover properties can be shifted towards the properties of the related bulk material. The stability of the nanocomposite allows further processing, such as electrospinning from solution.Entities:
Keywords: block copolymers; composite materials; electrospinning; nanoparticles; spin crossover
Year: 2020 PMID: 31891660 PMCID: PMC7155125 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201914343
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl ISSN: 1433-7851 Impact factor: 15.336
Scheme 1General synthesis approach and abbreviations used.
Figure 1Cryo‐TEM image of the narrowly dispersed spherical BCP micelles (A) with the hydrodynamic diameter distribution determined by DLS (B) and the size distribution derived from the image (C). Cryo‐TEM image of the narrowly dispersed spherical SCO CP‐BCP particles (D) with the hydrodynamic diameter distribution determined by DLS (E) and the size distribution derived from the image (F). (Corresponding DLS autocorrelation functions of both samples can be found in Figure S3.)
Figure 2TEM image of the empty BCP micelles (A) with size distribution of the P4VP cores (B). TEM image of the narrowly dispersed SCO CP‐BCP particles at low (C) and high (D) magnifications with size distribution of the SCO CP‐BCP composite cores (E).
Figure 3Magnetic susceptibility data for the SCO CP‐BCP composite particles given as χ M T vs. T plot measured in sweep and settle mode (A). The colors represent different cooling and heating cycles as stated in the bottom left corner. For comparison, the results for the bulk material25 are included as well. TEM image of the SCO CO‐BCP particles after annealing showing no agglomeration or enlargement of the particles (B). Size distribution of the particles derived from the given TEM image (C).
Data of the magnetic measurements for the different heating cycles. The measurement modes, transition temperatures, hysteresis widths and χ M T values are given. The sweep rate is 5 K min−1.
|
Entry |
Heating cycle [K] |
Mode |
|
|
Hysteresis width [K] |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 |
300–50–370[a] |
sweep |
163 |
170 |
7 |
1.70 |
|
2 |
370–50–380[b] |
sweep |
179 |
192 |
13 |
1.88 |
|
3 |
380–50–400[c] |
sweep |
192 |
207 |
15 |
1.69 |
|
4 |
400–50–400[d] |
sweep |
198 |
215 |
17 |
1.40 |
|
5 |
400–50–300[e] |
sweep |
200 |
217 |
17 |
1.27 |
|
6 |
400–50–300[f] |
settle |
203 |
217 |
14 |
1.04 |
[a] Figure 3 A, curve 1. [b] Figure 3 A, curve 2. [c] Figure 3 A, curve 3. [d] Figure 3 A, curve 4. [e] Figure 3 A, curve 5. [f] Figure 3 A curve 6.
The molar fraction of high‐spin molecules (γ HS) determined by Mössbauer spectroscopy (see Table S1) and magnetic susceptibility measurements (see Figure 3).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
175[f] |
0.80 |
0.86 |
0.68 |
0.63 |
0.58 |
|
80 |
0.62 |
0.62 |
0.54 |
0.55 |
0.45 |
|
175[g] |
0.74 |
0.80 |
0.61 |
0.58 |
0.50 |
[a], [d] Values determined by Mössbauer spectroscopy before and after annealing, respectively. [b], [c], [e] Values determined by magnetic susceptibility measurements (Figure 3, curves “1”, “3”, and “4”, respectively). [f] Data recorded upon cooling. [g] Data recorded upon heating.
Figure 4Temperature‐dependent powder X‐ray diffraction of the SCO CP‐BCP composite particles.
Figure 5Digital photograph of electrospun PS/SCO CP composite fibers on aluminum foil (A), digital photograph of a single fiber overlaid with the color‐coded 2D Raman image (B) and corresponding Raman spectra (C) of the SCO CP in the BCP micelles (black) and in PS fibers (red). As the SCO CP crystals in the micellar core are strong Raman scatterers, Raman imaging with a very low laser intensity of 0.1 mW allows a selective detection of the SCO CP particles in the composite fibers. Under these conditions PS shows no Raman signal.