Adoración G Quiroga1, Marta Cama1,2, Natalia Pajuelo-Lozano2, Amparo Álvarez-Valdés1, Isabel Sanchez Perez2. 1. Inorganic Chemistry Department, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid and IAdChem Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid 28049, Spain. 2. Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Medicine, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas Alberto Sols. CSIC-UAM, Madrid 28029, Spain.
Abstract
We have selected a series of aliphatic amine platinum compounds bearing chloride and/or iodide as the leaving groups. The complexes' cytotoxicity and interaction with DNA indicated differences in the reactivity. Now, we are reporting on the analysis of their molecular mechanism of action on gastric cancer cells. Our data reveals differences between them. Chlorido drugs showed similar behavior to cisplatin; they both required p53 to induce apoptosis but only cis-ipa showed DNA damage requirement for apoptosis induction. On the contrary, cis and trans iodido induced cell death independent of p53 activity, and they induced cell death through Bid activation, so their toxicity could be enhanced in a combined treatment with novel Bcl-2 protein family inhibitors. We also report the structural features of the DNA adduct for one of the complexes by X-ray diffraction. These findings represent a step forward in the search for new platinum-derived agents more specific and effective in the treatment of cancer.
We have selected a series of aliphatic amine platinum compounds bearing chloride and/or iodide as the leaving groups. The complexes' cytotoxicity and interaction with DNA indicated differences in the reactivity. Now, we are reporting on the analysis of their molecular mechanism of action on gastric cancer cells. Our data reveals differences between them. Chlorido drugs showed similar behavior to cisplatin; they both required p53 to induce apoptosis but only cis-ipa showed DNA damage requirement for apoptosis induction. On the contrary, cis and trans iodido induced cell death independent of p53 activity, and they induced cell death through Bid activation, so their toxicity could be enhanced in a combined treatment with novel Bcl-2 protein family inhibitors. We also report the structural features of the DNA adduct for one of the complexes by X-ray diffraction. These findings represent a step forward in the search for new platinum-derived agents more specific and effective in the treatment of cancer.
Cisplatin is a clinical drug used for the treatment of solid tumors; however, cisplatin can
produce relevant disadvantages that are difficult to overcome, as for example the cellular
development of resistance (intrinsic or acquired). In addition, treatment with cisplatin
manifests systemic side effects, such as neurotoxicity among others. Therefore, obtaining
metal derivatives of platinum that are equal or more effective than cisplatin will be of
great benefit in the cure of the disease.As we reported on the iodido complexes’ potential antitumoral action possibly caused
by their peculiar reactivity toward biological targets,[1] there has been a
new research trend with reports trying to better understand iodido complexes’
activity. The reevaluation of cis and trans iodido
derivatives’ cytotoxicity showed their efficiency and their interaction study versus
model proteins indicate a possible different mechanism of action.[2]
Further work proved this protein interaction of these complexes by X-ray diffraction.[3]As DNA is cisplatin’s main target, the studies of reevaluated iodide complexes with
DNA are an important step to take into consideration. The basic models (cisplatin and its
iodido analogues) were studied using oligo deoxyribo nucleotides as DNA models, indicating
the same type of interaction toward guanine (leading to adducts containing
(Pt(NH3)22+) with the iodido derivative always being more
reactive than cisplatin.[4] Another example is the work performed by
Dvořák et al., varying the amine ligand and substituting for bulkier
azaindoles.[5] They studied the cytotoxic activity of iodideazaindole
complexes and looked at the molecular level mechanism to find a decrease of tumor suppressor
p53 amount, which can agree with our previous observations with the aliphaticamine iodido
compounds.[6]On putting this information together, it is clear that iodide complexes interact with DNA,
but we need more data about the possible differences at molecular level and in particular,
about the signaling pathways, to deeply analyze a broader spectrum of interactions before
and after DNA damage. For this work, we will be using gastric cancer cell lines, with which
we have recently reported the molecular processes involved in cisplatin-induced
apoptosis.[7]
Results
We selected some of the reported structures, and we synthesized and characterized the
following series of compounds: cis-[Pt(ipa)2Cl2],
1, trans-[Pt(dma)(ipa)Cl2], 2,
cis-[Pt(ipa)2I2], 3, and
trans-[Pt(ipa)2I2], 4 (depicted in
Chart ). All data collected with these complexes
agreed with those previously reported,[1,6,8] therefore we performed the following assays.
Chart 1
Structure of Complexes 1 to 4
We began analyzing the viability in MNK45 gastric cancer cells after treatment with the
selected series of platinum compounds and using cisplatin (CDDP) as a reference. The results
are shown in Figure we observed that the survival
decreased in a dose-dependence manner with the following IC50: CDDP (20
μM), 1(80 μM), 2 (100 μM), 3 (180
μM), and 4 (140 μM). The compounds are less cytotoxic than
cisplatin, but these complexes show good values in other type of cell lines, in particular,
those which are not dependent on p53.[6] Therefore, we analyzed the
compound’s effect in the HCT116 wild type (WT) and HCT116p53 knock out (KO) cell
lines.
Figure 1
Cell viability results of cisplatin and complexes 1 to 4 for
the MNK45 gastric cancer cells.
Cell viability results of cisplatin and complexes 1 to 4 for
the MNK45 gastric cancer cells.Table shows the IC50 values from
HTC-116 cells (HCT-116 WT and p53KO) after treatment with the compounds. Our results show
that in the absence of p53, HTC116 are more resistant to CDDP than the WT HCT116 cells. The
treatment with compounds 1 and 2 shows an increase in the
IC50 when cells lack p53. In contrast, cells treated with compounds
3 and 4 do not exhibit the big difference in viability that is
shown by 1 and 2 independently of the genotype (Figure ). Although compounds 3 and 4
show a difference within the range of cisplatin, these data have to be evaluated to find if
the contribution of p53 in the cell death is partial and/or other pathways are involved in
the process.
Table 1
IC50 for Complexes 1–4
WT IC50 (μM)
p53–/– IC50
(μM)
CDDP
15.34 ± 2.17
48.75 ± 4.80
1
91.20 ± 9.90
172.18 ± 12.24
2
66.37 ± 3.40
133.35 ± 15.21
3
55.71 ± 3.22
85.50 ± 10.73
4
28.64 ± 2.90
66.07 ± 5.38
Figure 2
Cell viability results of the complexes in HCT116 wild type and p53 KO cell lines. CDDP
was used as a reference. Cell survival percentage of HCT166WT and HCT116
p53–/– cells after 72 h of CDDP or compounds treatment. Cells
were treated with increasing concentrations of CDDP (0–75 μM) or compounds
(0–250 μM) The percentage of viable cells was quantified by the MTS assay.
Data represent the mean values obtained in three experiments performed in
quadruplicate.
Cell viability results of the complexes in HCT116 wild type and p53 KO cell lines. CDDP
was used as a reference. Cell survival percentage of HCT166WT and HCT116p53–/– cells after 72 h of CDDP or compounds treatment. Cells
were treated with increasing concentrations of CDDP (0–75 μM) or compounds
(0–250 μM) The percentage of viable cells was quantified by the MTS assay.
Data represent the mean values obtained in three experiments performed in
quadruplicate.The cytotoxicity result inHTC-116 encouraged us to evaluate p53 activation in MNK45 after
treatment with the different compounds and CDDP as a control. To do that, we analyzed the
phosphorylation of Ser15 in p53, which is indicative of activation by WB. The results
indicate that p53 is activated in response to cisplatin and compound 2 in a
persistent manner up to 48 h. In contrast, the treatment with compound 1
induced p53 phosphorylation, transitory with a maximum peak at 24 h (Figure
). Surprisingly (however), no activation of p53 was observed
after treatment with compound 3 and 4.
Figure 3
Complex 1 and 2 induces p53 activation in MKN45 cells. Cells
were treated with the complexes CDDP, 1, 2, 3,
and 4 at IC50 dose for each compounds, and harvested at the indicated
times. P53 total levels and phosphorylated were detected by Western blot using specific
antibodies. Tubulin was used as a control.
Complex 1 and 2 induces p53 activation in MKN45 cells. Cells
were treated with the complexes CDDP, 1, 2, 3,
and 4 at IC50 dose for each compounds, and harvested at the indicated
times. P53 total levels and phosphorylated were detected by Western blot using specific
antibodies. Tubulin was used as a control.Next, we analyzed the molecular markers that indicate apoptosis induction. We observed the
activation of caspase 3 with the whole series of compounds. To corroborate these results, we
analyzed the proteolysis of PARP (specific substrate of caspase 3) that shows a clear
proteolysis, according to caspase 3 activation (Figure ). This effect is also observed for cisplatin, as previously reported. In the
end, apoptosis induction is corroborated.
Figure 4
Caspase-3 activation and PARP proteolysis is detected after treatment with CDDP,
1, 2, 3, and 4 in MKN45 cells.
Cells were treated as in Figure . Caspase 3
and PARP were detected by using specific antibodies.
Caspase-3 activation and PARP proteolysis is detected after treatment with CDDP,
1, 2, 3, and 4 in MKN45 cells.
Cells were treated as in Figure . Caspase 3
and PARP were detected by using specific antibodies.CDDP activates apoptosis mainly through the intrinsic pathway, and then we explored the
intrinsic apoptosis pathway activation by the compounds. First, we study the protein levels
of different members of BcL2 family. We observed induction of the proapoptotic protein, Puma
after treatment with CDDP and 1 but not 2. In fact compound
2 does not show differences at any time after treatment. In contrast, Puma
protein is not induced after exposure to 3 and 4. The
pro-apoptotic protein, Bax increases in response to CDDP and 1, whereas
compound 2 slightly induces Bax. The iodide complex 3 instead
provoked Bax induction, as we observed a small but clear level decrease at 48 h. Complex
4 does not modify Bax expression (Figure ).
Figure 5
Bcl-2 protein family members analyzed by western blot from MKN45 cells treated with
CDDP, 1, 2, 3, and 4 as in Figure . Proteins Puma, Bax, Bid, and MCL1 were
detected by using specific antibodies. Tubulin was used as the control.
Bcl-2 protein family members analyzed by western blot from MKN45 cells treated with
CDDP, 1, 2, 3, and 4 as in Figure . Proteins Puma, Bax, Bid, and MCL1 were
detected by using specific antibodies. Tubulin was used as the control.We observed induction of the proapoptotic protein, Puma after treatment with CDDP,
1, and 2 (Figure ).
However, 3 and 4 do not induce Puma. P53 contributes to Puma
induction; therefore, this result is in agreement with the p53 levels previously observed
(Figure ). The pro-apoptotic protein, Bax
increases in response to CDDP and 1, whereas compound 2 slightly
induces Bax. The iodide complexes (3 and 4) do not modify Bax
expression (Figure ).BID1 protein belongs to BH3-only Bcl2 subfamily; it is a cytoplasmic protein that once
proteolyzed, translocates to the mitochondria membrane binding to BAX, which allows Cyt C
release and caspase 9 and 3 activation. Then, BID1 is activated by CDDP, 1, and
2 after 6 h of treatment; however, 3 and 4 provoke
only a transitory activation, with a highest point after 6 h.Finally, the antiapoptotic Mcl1 expression analysis after 6 h of treatment shows that CDDP
produces clear degradation as it is described in the literature after 48 h.[7] Compound 1 shows the same profile. No degradation is observed
neither with 2 nor with 4, but a surprisingly marked degradation
is observed with 3 h treatment.It is known that JNK and p38 could phosphorylate MCL1 and induce its
degradation.[9−11] We studied the MAKPs
activation after treatment with the compounds; the results show a transient activation of
p38 when treated with CDDP, 1, and 2, and a persistent activation
with 3 and 4 (Figure ).
Only 2 and 3 show clear but transitory activation of JNK with the
highest peak after 6 h. The entire compound series activates ERK, showing similar profile
with the exception of 2 (which activates only in a transitory way). These
results may indicate that MCL1 degradation is produced by p38 phosphorylation.
Figure 6
MAP Kinase members analyzed by western blot from MKN45 cells treated with CDDP,
1, 2, 3, and 4.
MAP Kinase members analyzed by western blot from MKN45 cells treated with CDDP,
1, 2, 3, and 4.DNA is the main cellular target for platinum complexes, which leads to the activation of
different checkpoints in the cell cycle. We then analyzed the cell cycle profile after
treatment with the drugs by flow cytometry on the cancer cells. The results showed an
increase in phase S (54.2%) for the cells treated with CDDP, which is indicative of intra S
checkpoint activation. Compound 1 provokes an increase of cells in phase S
(29%) and phase G2/M (31.3%), whereas the rest of the series produced such increase at the
G2/M checkpoint (34.5% 2; 31.6%: 3; and 39.8%: 4)
(Figure , Table ).
Figure 7
Cell cycle profile of MKN45 cells after treatment with the complexes. DNA content was
assessed by flow cytometry, and cell cycle distribution was analyzed using Cell Quest
Pro software. Table shows the percentage of
each cell phase, which is given as the mean of three experiments. G2/M: cells in G2 or
mitosis; S: cells in phase of synthesis of DNA; G1: cells in G1, apoptosis.
Table 2
Percentage of Cells in Each Cell Cycle Phase after Treatment with the Drugs
apoptosis
G1
S
G2/M
control
2.8
55.6
21.5
19.4
CDDP
12.4
14
54.2
18.9
1
15.5
22.7
29.7
31.3
2
15.5
30.2
17.5
34.5
3
21.3
20.8
24.4
31.6
4
10
24.1
23.5
39.8
Cell cycle profile of MKN45 cells after treatment with the complexes. DNA content was
assessed by flow cytometry, and cell cycle distribution was analyzed using Cell Quest
Pro software. Table shows the percentage of
each cell phase, which is given as the mean of three experiments. G2/M: cells in G2 or
mitosis; S: cells in phase of synthesis of DNA; G1: cells in G1, apoptosis.CDDP requires DNA damage during the S-phase to induce apoptosis. In order to know if the
drugs share this requirement, we synchronized the cell in G1 by using Palbociclib (1
μM) and then treated with the drugs (complexes 1 to 4). Our
results showed that 1 and CDDP produce a lesion on phase S in order to induce
cell death, whereas none of the compounds of the series causes such lesion. This result
indicates that the apoptosis induction by 2, 3, and 4
could start at the phase G2/M (Figure ).
Figure 8
Apopstosis percentage of MKN45 cells after synchronizing with Palbociclib (1 μM)
for 18 h and the complexes. DNA content was assessed by flow cytometry, as in Figure . Results of the compounds in %
synchronized culture cell by using Palbociclib. Ap: apoptosis.
Apopstosis percentage of MKN45 cells after synchronizing with Palbociclib (1 μM)
for 18 h and the complexes. DNA content was assessed by flow cytometry, as in Figure . Results of the compounds in %
synchronized culture cell by using Palbociclib. Ap: apoptosis.As at the last step, we prove the reactivity of the complexes at the molecular level with a
small model of DNA. The treatment of
trans-[Pt(ipa)2I2] with two equivalents of
AgNO3 forced the aqua-complex formation which reacts with two equivalents of
9-EtG (9-ethyl guanine) to produce the complex
(ipa)](NO),
where the iodide groups are replaced by the base.The structure in Figure shows a mononuclear
adduct where the Pt atom is bound to two molecules of 9-EtG through N7 in a square planar
geometry similarly to other examples of refs (12−14). Both 9-EtG molecules are coplanar, whereas isopropylamine ligands are
180° twisted giving the most stable conformation to the molecule. This conformation
shows hydrogen bonding interaction between O1 from the carbonyl group of 9EtG and
hydrogen of the −NH2 group from isopropylamine. This kind of interaction
has been described to stabilize similar structures.[15,16] The distance of 2.249 Å indicated strong
intramolecular interaction which is the most significant data, as it might potentially
hinder the 9-EtG ligands from rotating freely around Pt1–N2
when binding to any target.[17] The crystal structure also shows
intermolecular hydrogen bonds that involve the nitrate contraction linked by a series of NH
O contacts. As can be seen in Figure , they are
responsible for solid-state packaging.
Figure 9
Structure of the complex
(ipa)](NO).
Figure 10
Molecules arrangement in complex
trans-[Pt(9-EtG)2(ipa)2](NO3)2
crystal structure.
Structure of the complex
(ipa)](NO).Molecules arrangement in complex
trans-[Pt(9-EtG)2(ipa)2](NO3)2
crystal structure.
Discussion
Based on the efficacy of CDDP (in spite of some of its side effects) and trying to find a
clear signaling pathway for the iodide and chlorido compounds, we have analyzed the
cytotoxic activity versus the gastric cancer cell line (MKN45) for four cis and trans
selected complexes. The complexes show aliphaticamines in their structure and chloride and
iodide as the leaving groups.The compounds, together with CDDP, are capable to decrease the MKN45 cell survival, even
though CDDP needs lower doses to produce the same percentage of cell death. It is well known
that every cancer cell is different, and as we mentioned before, iodide complexes can be
active in cancer cells from different tumors.[2] In fact, HCT116 cell lines
results showed lower IC50 values than those observed in MKN45.p53 is a tumor suppressor protein which is mutated in more than the 50% of tumors;
therefore, this finding is of a vital importance in the treatment of tumorsp53 null.
Mutation on the p53 gene is involved in CDDP resistance in cancer as a consequence of loss
of the ability of p53 to transactivate Bax and Puma.[18,19]The bigger difference in the viability data of complexes 1 and 2
compared with cisplatin indicates a very clear p53 dependence, whereas complexes
3 and 4 did not show that difference. Moreover, complexes
1 and 2 induce apoptosis and p53 transcriptional dependence
genes (Puma and Bax) as cisplatin does. However, the data indicate that the cell death
produced by complexes 3 and 4 might only be dependent partially on
p53 in spite of the 30 μM difference in the genotype. Complexes 1 and
4 do not induce PUMA and BAX, which are the genes induced by 1,
2, and cisplatin.[18] DNA is the target for chlorido and
iodido complexes; based on the differences observed in the reactivity, we thought that the
iodido complexes could have some structural differences when binding to DNA. Nucleotides are
of a common use in molecular biology studies, and they can also serve to achieve more
information about the structural nature of the DNA adducts formed by platinum complexes, in
particular 5′-GMP. In our case, we have used 9-EtG as a small DNA model base because
this molecule is smaller than nucleotides or plasmidic DNA and more soluble in organic
solvents than 5′-GMP, which is also a very convenient model to use for NMR monitoring
studies. All these models of DNA help to evaluate the platinum compounds’ reactivity
and allow the final adducts characterization by different techniques and ideally by X-ray
diffraction. The reactivity of trans-[Pt(ipa)2I2]
with 9-EtG produces the formation of the adducts more rapidly than the cis
counterpart,[2] leading to the final isolation of the bisadduct
(ipa)](NO)
when forcing the conditions. In this article, we report the X-ray resolution of the final
adduct, which supports the classical reactivity of the trans de
PtII–I versus DNA hypothesized in our previous work.[2]
We also report hydrogen bonding that can prevent the rotation of the molecule around the
Pt1–N2 bond and be the direct structural feature produced by
the platinum complex in the DNA molecule.The analysis of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway induced by the compounds has revealed some
important differences; compounds 1 and 3 generate an intrinsic
apoptosis pathway similarly to CDDP inducing mitochondria perturbation. However, compound
4 seems to follow a different profile, and possibly more pathways are
involved in its action. One possibility might be that compound 4 could induce
cell death by the extrinsic pathway or by related receptors. Possibly the activation of
caspase 8 will support this hypothesis and further studies will be carried out to explore
this possibility. Therefore, compound 4 toxicity could be enhanced in a
combined treatment with novel MCL1 inhibitors under development.[20] We
have also demonstrated that compound 2, 3, and 4
induce cell death independently of replicative stress. Apoptosis is activated from G2/M,
differently from CDDP (whose well-defined target is DNA), but cell death is induced by
replicative stress along the S phase.Compound 2 shows in general a midway behavior between CDDP and iodide
complexes, and in particular the fact that JNK activates only in a transitory way could be
related with a higher repair capacity of the DNA lesion.Figure shows a summary of the apoptotic
pathway induced by the drug. We propose that iodide drugs increased cell death independent
of p53, which is very promising for tumors with p53 mutated. Complex 2 could be
used in combination with other drugs as a mimic of BH·-only proteins to
increase the activity. In summary, we have demonstrated that the synthetic variations on
platinum complexes can modulate the interaction with these targets and the use of that
information is very relevant for pharmaceutical purposes.
Figure 11
Apoptotic pathway and targets for complexes 1, 2,
3, and 4.
Apoptotic pathway and targets for complexes 1, 2,
3, and 4.
Materials and Methods
Cell Lines
MKN45 and HCT116humangastric adenocarcinoma cell lines were acquired from ATCC and
cultured in RPMI medium or McCoy’s 5a medium modified (Gibco), complemented with
10% FBS. Cultures were kept at 37 °C, 5% CO2, and 95% humidity. MKN45
cells are wild type for TP53. Mycoplasma contamination tests are frequently run in our
laboratory.
Chemicals
CDDP was kindly supplied by Ferrer FARMA. The compounds used for the assays
(1, 2, 3, and 4) were synthesized
following reported procedures, briefly described in the Supporting Information Section S1.[20] The solution for the
MTS assay: CellTiter 96 AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay was acquired from
Promega.
Reaction of trans-[Pt(ipa)2I2] with 9-EtG:
trans-[Pt(9-EtG)2(ipa)2](NO3)2
A solution of AgNO3 (16.5 mg, 0.097 mmol) in 0.2 mL of H2O was
added to a solution of complex 3 (27 mg, 0.048 mmol) in acetone and stirred
at room temperature in the dark for 10 min. The mixture was filtered and the resulting
solution mixed with a freshly prepared solution of 9 EtG (17.3 mg, 0.097 mmol) in 0.3 mL
of a solution of acetone/H2O (2:1), stirred at room temperature for 24 h, and
allowed to stand until single crystals were formed and isolated. The final compound
(ipa)](NO)
was shiny white. Anal. Calc. for
PtC20H36N14O8·H2O: C, 29.50;
H, 4.70; N, 24.64%. Found: C, 29.22; H, 5.00; N, 24.48. The structural features of
(ipa)](NO)
were unambiguously proven by X-ray diffraction. Data collection was performed on a Bruker
Kappa Apex II (X8 APEX, Bruker, Rivas-Vaciamadrid, Madrid, Spain) area detector X-ray
diffractometer using a graphite-monochromated Mo radiation. Crystal data are listed in
Table SM1. Selected distances and angles are collected in Table SM2.
Cell Viability
Cell viability was assessed using a crystal violet-based staining method. The cells (3.5
× 105) were seeded in 0.5 mL of completed medium in 24 multiwell dishes,
treated with different amounts of CDDP, Cl-1, Cl-3, I-5, and I-6 dissolved in the culture
medium (RPMI) and fixed with 0.1% glutaraldehyde. After 30 min, they were washed with
distilled water and stained with 0.1% crystal violet. A colorimetric ELISA-based assay set
at 595 nm was used to estimate the number of cells per well. MTS protocol was performed
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. IC50 were calculated by
using the graph PAD prysme programme. We used nonlinear regression to fit the data to the
log (inhibitor) versus response (variable slope).
Cell Cycle Analysis
MKN45 cells were seeded in 2.5 mL of RPMI 10% FBS in p60 plates and treated with
solutions of the compounds following the established IC50. The cells were
fixed, 24 and 48 h after the treatment was applied, using 70% ethanol in
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). To perform the DNA content analysis, the cells were
centrifuged, the supernatant was discarded and 200 μl of propidium iodide was added,
and the tubes were incubated for 15 min in darkness. Finally, 200 μl of a solution
of RNase in PBS (10 μl/mL) was added to each tube. The cells were analyzed using a
Becton Dickinson Flow Cytometer (Cowley, United Kingdom).
Western Blotting
The total protein extracts (WCE) were prepared using a lysis supplemented with
phosphatase and protease inhibitors. WCE samples (20 μg) were loaded in 15% (Bcl-2
family and caspase-3), 10% (JNK, p38 and ERK), and 8% (PARP-1, p53, MCL1) SDS-PAGE
polyacrylamide gels. Once the electrophoresis was completed, they were transferred to
polyvinylidene difluoride membranes and immunodetection was done using the correspondent
antibodies. The following antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Technology: PARP-1
(sc-7150), Mcl-1 (sc-819), JNK (sc-827), p38 (sc-535), and ERK 1/2 (sc-154). The
antibodies for Cleaved Caspase-3 (Asp175) (#9661), Bax, BID, PUMA (#12450), p-p38 (1:2000,
#4631), p-p53 (Ser15) (#9284), and p53 (#9282) were acquired from Cell Signaling
Technology. The antibody for p-JNK was bought from Promega Corporation,
Spain. Last, the antibody for tubulin (1:10 000) was acquired from Sigma-Aldrich.
The standard working dilution for the antibodies was 1:1000, unless a different one was
specified above.
Authors: Luigi Messori; Angela Casini; Chiara Gabbiani; Elena Michelucci; Leticia Cubo; Carla Ríos-Luci; José M Padrón; Carmen Navarro-Ranninger; Adoracion G Quiroga Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2010-07-21 Impact factor: 4.345
Authors: J M Pérez; E I Montero; A M González; X Solans; M Font-Bardia; M A Fuertes; C Alonso; C Navarro-Ranninger Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2000-06-15 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Luigi Messori; Leticia Cubo; Chiara Gabbiani; Amparo Álvarez-Valdés; Elena Michelucci; Giuseppe Pieraccini; Carla Ríos-Luci; Leticia G León; José M Padrón; Carmen Navarro-Ranninger; Angela Casini; Adoración G Quiroga Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2012-01-06 Impact factor: 5.165
Authors: P Perego; M Giarola; S C Righetti; R Supino; C Caserini; D Delia; M A Pierotti; T Miyashita; J C Reed; F Zunino Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1996-02-01 Impact factor: 12.701