Palladium nanoparticles (Pd NPs) of different shapes and sizes have been synthesized by reducing potassium tetrachloropalladinate(II) by l-ascorbic acid (AA) in an aqueous solution phase in the presence of an amphiphilic nonionic surfactant poly ethylene glycol (PEG) via a sonochemical method. Materials have been characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), energy dispersive X-ray soectrscopy (EDX), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), particle distribution, and zeta potential studies. Truncated octahedron/fivefold twinned pentagonal rods are formed at room temperature (RT) (25 °C) while hexagonal/trigonal plates are formed at 65 °C. XRD results show evolution of anisotropically grown, phase-pure, and well crystalline face-centered cubic Pd NPs at both temperatures. FTIR and SERS studies revealed adsorption of ascorbic acid (AA) and PEG at NP's surface. Particle's size distribution graph indicates formation of particles having wide size distribution while the zeta potential particle surface is negatively charged and stable. The truncated octahedron/fivefold twinned pentagonal rod-shaped Pd NPs, formed at RT, while thermally stable and kinetically controlled hexagonal/trigonal plate-like Pd NPs, evolved at higher temperature 65 °C. The obtained Pd NPs have a high surface area and narrow pore size distribution. To predict protein reactivity of the Pd cluster, docking has been done with DNA and lung cancer-effective proteins. The cytotoxicity of the Pd NPs has been screened on human lung cancer cells A-549 at 37 °C. The biological adaptability exhibited by Pd NPs has opened a pathway in biochemical applications.
Palladium nanoparticles (Pd NPs) of different shapes and sizes have been synthesized by reducing potassium tetrachloropalladinate(II) by l-ascorbic acid (AA) in an aqueous solution phase in the presence of an amphiphilic nonionic surfactant poly ethylene glycol (PEG) via a sonochemical method. Materials have been characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), energy dispersive X-ray soectrscopy (EDX), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), particle distribution, and zeta potential studies. Truncated octahedron/fivefold twinned pentagonal rods are formed at room temperature (RT) (25 °C) while hexagonal/trigonal plates are formed at 65 °C. XRD results show evolution of anisotropically grown, phase-pure, and well crystalline face-centered cubic Pd NPs at both temperatures. FTIR and SERS studies revealed adsorption of ascorbic acid (AA) and PEG at NP's surface. Particle's size distribution graph indicates formation of particles having wide size distribution while the zeta potential particle surface is negatively charged and stable. The truncated octahedron/fivefold twinned pentagonal rod-shaped Pd NPs, formed at RT, while thermally stable and kinetically controlled hexagonal/trigonal plate-like Pd NPs, evolved at higher temperature 65 °C. The obtained Pd NPs have a high surface area and narrow pore size distribution. To predict protein reactivity of the Pd cluster, docking has been done with DNA and lung cancer-effective proteins. The cytotoxicity of the Pd NPs has been screened on humanlung cancer cells A-549 at 37 °C. The biological adaptability exhibited by Pd NPs has opened a pathway in biochemical applications.
In the last few decades,
mesoporous materials have gained enormous
attention of various scientists globally in both industry and academia
because of their high surface area, tunable pore size, and uniform
and narrow pore size distribution.[1,2] On account
of these properties, mesoporous and nanoporous materials have shown
high demand in various fields such as energy storage,[3] catalysis,[4,5] and biomedical applications.[6,7] In the past, nanoparticles of desired shapes, such as spherical,
films, rods, tubes, and so forth with mesoporous structures have been
prepared by a soft template method like self-assembly of micelles.[8] On the other hand, in the hard template method,
the targeted materials are deposited in the confined spaces of a template
with the desired morphology.[9] Because the
soft template method is a simple and easy approach, hence it is favorable
for the generation of desired shapes of nanoparticles using low molecular
weight molecules like Brij 58, poly ethylene glycol (PEG), and so
forth and high molecular weight amphiphilic molecules, for example,
triblock copolymers as pore-directing agents.In recent years
nanotechnology has shown enormous potential in
the biomedical field as therapeutic mediators for many diseases, including
cancer.[10] In this regard, metal nanostructures
have attracted great interest because of their size, structure, versatility,
and optoelectronic properties.[11] Since
the introduction of catalytic converters in the USA in 1975 and in
Europe in 1986 (Wiseman and Zereini 2009), platinum group metals have
shown increasing demands particularly in the area of electronics and
catalysis. The latest research demonstrate that palladium
(Pd) nanoparticles have widely been used in catalysis, (e.g., oxidation/reduction
of methanol,[12] stereochemical oxidation
of ethanol,[13] redox organic reactions,[14,15] sensors for detection of various analytes,[16] hydrogen generation/storage, methane combustion, supercapacitors,
lithium-ion batteries, and in biomedical applications.[17] Shim et al. synthesized dendriticplatinum nanoparticles
and demonstrated their cytotoxicities against human embryonic kidney
cells.[18] Unciti-Broceta et al. demonstrated
that the prodrugs 5-fluoro-1-propargyluracil[19] and N-4-propargyloxycarbonylgemcitabine[20] are independently harmless; however, when separately
combined with Pd(0)-glycol-polystyrene resin these prodrugs exhibited
antiproliferation properties compared to the unmodified drug in colorectal
and pancreatic cancer cells. However, one of the major limitations,
in the case of metallic NPs is their nonspecific untargeted toxicity.
Huang et al. used ultrathin (1.8 nm) hexagonal Pd nanosheets with
a 41 nm edge for cancer photothermal therapy (PT). The nanosheets
were able to kill 100% liver cancer cells after 5 min irradiation
of 808 nm laser, showing size-dependent and tunable absorption peaks
in the NIR region and exhibited high biocompatibility in the absence
of irradiation. More interestingly, these Pd nanosheets exhibited
better photostability than Au and Ag nanostructures.[21] Balbín et al. reported high cytotoxicity of mesoporoussilica-supported Pd NPs against four humancancer cell lines, simultaneously
displaying catalytic activity for C–C bond formation via Suzuki–Miyaura
cross-coupling between small molecules.[22] Kumar et al. prepared (polylactic-co-glycolic acid)-loaded
nanoparticle betulinic acid for improved treatment of hepatic cancer
and showed in vitro and in vivo evaluation.[23] Several structural modifications have been proposed to improve biomedical
efficiency of Pd nanoparticles.[22,24] Porous Pd nanoparticles
(22.8 nm) were also recently reported as attractive PT agents with
a PT conversion efficiency as high as 93.4%, which is comparable to
typical Au nanorods.[25]There is high
interest to expand the applicability of Pd nanoparticles;
therefore, it is highly desirable to synthesize shape- and size-controlled
Pd NPs for excellent performance in biomedical applications. Generation
of Pd nanoparticles using amphiphilic molecules (nonionic surfactants)
via a sonochemical process is a novel and rapid approach to tune the
kinetics of the reaction. In this investigation, mesoporous Pd nanoparticles
have been prepared via a sonochemical route and their cytotoxicity
has been screened by using the culture of humanlung cancer cells
A-549.
Materials and Methods
Materials
Analytical reagent grade
potassium tetrachloropalladinate(II) (K2PdCl4), PEG and l-ascorbic acid (AA, C6H8O6) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used without
further purification. Deionized water and ethanol were used as solvents
in this study.
Synthesis
In the two different vessels,
10 mL solutions of 0.1 M K2PdCl4 were prepared,
and 10 mL aqueous 0.1 M ascorbic acid (AA) solutions were added to
each vessel. Further, 1 mL of 50 mg/L aqueous PEG solutions were added
to each reaction mixtures. The two solution mixtures were reacted
at room temperature (RT) and 65 °C, respectively, for 30 min
with thorough ultrasonication (220–240 V, 50–60 Hz).
After the reactions, the products were collected by centrifugation
and washed several times with deionized water and ethanol to remove
the residual surfactant and excess reactants.
Characterization
The X-ray diffraction
(XRD) patterns of the obtained products were recorded on a Panalytical’s
X’Pert Pro X-ray diffractometer in the 2θ range 10–80°
with a step size of 0.025°. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
images of the materials were observed on JEOL 6490 LB equipment at
an operating electrical energy of 3 kV. Particle shapes and sizes
of the materials were further examined on a JEOL-2100 transmission
electron microscope . The zeta potential of Pd nanoparticles (formed
at RT) was measured using a Zetasizer ZS90 (Nano series Malvern Instrument)
at RT. Dispersion of nanoparticles was sonicated for 20 min and diluted
to make a solution with concentration 80 μg/mL in phosphate
buffered saline (pH = 7.4). The particle size and size distribution
were carried out on a Zetasizer ZS90 (Nano series Malvern Instrument).
The Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) spectrum of Pd nanoparticles,
formed at RT, was recorded on a NSCOM/Raman/confocal/atomic force
microscope used for UV/lithography (200 nm) and near-field imaging
of features as small as 100 nm Raman spectra and imaging for an excitation
wavelength of 532 nm with an extinction coefficient of 8000 M–1 cm–1. Fourier transform infrared
(FTIR) spectra of the products have been recorded on a PerkinElmer
Spectrum Two instrument. UV/vis data were collected on a Shimadzu
UV-3600 spectrophotometer. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET)
analysis of the materials was recorded on a BELsorp-mini II instrument.
Cytotoxicity Test
The culture of
A-549humanlung cancer cells (∼100 000 cell mL–1) was taken in 10% fetal bovine serum-supplemented
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium in a 24-well microtitre
plate. Different amounts of Pd NPs (formed at RT) were suspended in
deionized water to make solutions with concentration from 10 to 60
μg mL–1. Homogenization of each solution was
carried out with an ultrasonic processor (Labsonic M, Sartorius Stedim
Biotech GmbH) for 15 min and added separately to cultures, keeping
one blank as the reference. The cultures were incubated for 24 h in
an incubator with 5% CO2 in a humid atmosphere at 37 °C.
After incubation, the cells were removed from the culture by trypsinization
and washed a coupled by Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH: 7.4) to
remove the residual presence of serum. The cells were again suspended
in PBS, and aliquots of 20 μL were prepared from all the cultures.
Equal amounts (v/v) of prefiltered 0.4% trypan blue stain were added
to the aliquots and were put aside to settle for 1 min. To determine
the cell viability, the samples were observed on an inverted microscope
in a Fuchs-Rosenthal haemocytometer. The results of cytotoxicity were
expressed by plotting cell viability histogram and curve and analyzed
using IC50 values.
Results and Discussion
Characterization of Pd Nanoparticles
When the solution containing [PdCl4]2– complex ions were treated with AA at RT, the solution turned black
within 30 min, indicating a reduction of [PdCl4]2– complex ions is completed in this period. This reaction was monitored
by the UV–visible absorption spectroscopy experiment as shown
in Figure . Before
formation of Pd NPs, the absorption band corresponding to the Pd complex
was clearly detected at 424 nm, which completely disappeared after
the reaction, indicating that the complex ions are changed from Pd2+ to Pd(0) owing to their reduction by AA.[13] Moreover, the spectrum of the sample shows broad continuous
absorptions in the UV–visible range which is characteristic
of the reduced Pd NPs as reported earlier.[26] On increasing the reaction temperature at 65 °C virtually no
alteration in the spectral profile has been observed. The yield of
this reaction was approximately 91.84%.
Figure 1
UV–visible absorption
spectra of K2PdCl4 and Pd NPs synthesized at
RT and at 65 °C.
UV–visible absorption
spectra of K2PdCl4 and Pd NPs synthesized at
RT and at 65 °C.To observe the adsorption of organic molecules
on the surface of
Pd nanoparticles, FTIR spectra of the formed nanoparticles (at RT)
were carried out in a liquid phase as well as in a solid phase (Figure ). In the liquid
phase FTIR spectrum (Figure a), the intense peak at 3425 cm–1 is corresponding
to O–H stretching of water molecules/–OH groups. The
peak at 1634 cm–1 is because of the C=C stretching
frequency of AA. Red shifting of C=C stretching frequency (compared
to 1665 cm–1 in pure AA) is because of adsorption
of l-ascorbic acid on the nanoparticle’s surface.[27] The peak at 1452 cm–1 is due
to −CH2 scissoring, at 964 cm–1 is due to −CH2 wagging, at 1029 cm–1 is due to −CH2 rocking and at 1268 cm–1 is due to C–O–C antisymmetric stretching vibration
of adsorbed PEG at the particle’s surface.[28] Other peaks at 651 and 458 cm–1 correspond
to the vibration of the adsorbed AA nanoparticle’s surface.
Figure 2
FTIR spectra
of Pd NPs formed at RT (a) in solution phase and (b)
in solid phase.
FTIR spectra
of Pd NPs formed at RT (a) in solution phase and (b)
in solid phase.In the solid phase FTIR spectrum (Figure b), the intensity of peaks
is much decreased
compared to those in the solution phase. Many peaks have disappeared
while the intensity of a few peaks has increased. The increased intensity
peaks at 2927 and 2853 cm–1 is due −CH2 stretching vibration while the peak at 1452 cm–1 is due to CH2 scissoring of alkyl chains of adsorbed
PEG. Position of these peaks is much decreased compared to those of
pure PEG[28] because of adsorption at nanoparticle’s
surface. Although peaks corresponding to −CH2 stretching
do not appear in Figure a, however, a small hump is visible at 2927 cm–1 probably because of preferential adsorption of AA at nanoparticle’s
surface in the liquid phase.Further vibrational analysis of
Pd nanoparticles (formed at RT)
was carried out by Raman measurement, which shows very strong, few
broad and weak background peaks. The Intensity versus Raman shift
graph was plotted to take 20 mM Pd NPs, grafted with PEG and coated
with AA (Figure ).
In the SERS spectrum, the strong peaks at 480 and 633 cm–1 are because of ascorbic acid, while the peak at 278 cm–1 is probably because of υ (Pd...O) vibration.[29] The bands at 1076, 1170, and 1516 cm–1 are because of (C–O–H bend), CH2 rocking,
and CH2 scissoring.[30]
Figure 3
SERS spectra
of Pd NPs synthesized at RT.
SERS spectra
of Pd NPs synthesized at RT.The structural and morphological investigation
of the abovementioned
synthesized materials has been performed using SEM and transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) analysis. Different shapes and sizes of
Pd nanoparticles have been formed at RT and at 65 °C. When the
[PdCl4]2– complex ions were treated with
AA in PEG medium at RT, truncated octahedron/fivefold twinned pentagonal
rodlike Pd NPs have been formed on 30 minutes of the reaction. In
the SEM images (Figure a,b) and the TEM image (Figure c), 8–10 nm edge length truncated octahedron/fivefold
twinned pentagonal rodlike Pd nanoparticles were observed. The size
of nanostructures varies in the range of 20–50 nm. In the corresponding
energy dispersive X-ray soectrscopy (EDX) pattern (Figure d), the only peak due to Pd
was observed, indicating the formation of phase-pure Pd NPs. When
the reaction temperature was increased at 65 °C, keeping reaction
time same, that is, 30 min, 17–20 nm edge length hexagonal/trigonal
plates were formed. In the SEM image (Figure a), although the structures seem to be plate-like,
however in the corresponding TEM image (Figure b) hexagonal/trigonal plate-like structures
are visible.
Figure 4
(a,b) SEM images, (c) TEM image, and (d) EDX spectrum
of Pd NPs
synthesized at RT.
Figure 5
(a) SEM image, (b) TEM image, and (c) EDX spectrum of
Pd NPs synthesized
at 65 °C.
(a,b) SEM images, (c) TEM image, and (d) EDX spectrum
of Pd NPs
synthesized at RT.(a) SEM image, (b) TEM image, and (c) EDX spectrum of
Pd NPs synthesized
at 65 °C.The particle size and size distribution analysis
of Pd NPs, formed
at RT were carried out to by plotting the particle’s size distribution
curve (Figure ). The
curve indicates that the size of the particles is distributed in a
range of 20–60 nm while the maximum population falls at 40
nm. Zeta potential analysis is an effective technique for determining
the surface charge of nanoparticles in colloidal solution and hence
predicts their stability. The zeta potential curve of the Pd nanoparticle
dispersion (formed at RT) was measured in the range of −100
to +100 mV (Figure ). The obtained zeta potential value (−13 mV) indicates that
the surface of nanoparticles is negatively charged and thus maintains
their stability.
Figure 6
Particle’s size distribution of Pd nanoparticles
formed
at RT.
Figure 7
Zeta potential distribution curve of Pd nanoparticles
formed at
RT.
Particle’s size distribution of Pd nanoparticles
formed
at RT.Zeta potential distribution curve of Pd nanoparticles
formed at
RT.The phase and crystallinity of Pd NPs were investigated
by wide-angle
XRD measurement. In the XRD pattern of the Pd NPs (formed at RT and
at 65 °C), peaks observed at 2θ positions 40.26, 45.78,
68.67, 79.87, and 88.85° correspond to the reflection of (111),
(200), (220), (311), and (222) planes of crystalline Pd NPs (Figure a). These XRD patterns
indicate the formation of phase pure face-centered cubic (fcc) Pd
NPs (JCPDS file no. 461043). The weak intensity peak at 27° in
the XRD pattern of Pd NPs formed at 65 °C is because of the presence
of residual PEG moieties.[31] Furthermore,
the obtained XRD peaks are intense and broadened, indicating the formation
of good crystalline and small size Pd nanoparticles.[18] The average crystallite size (D) has been
determined from the Debye–Scherrer formulawhere D is the crystallites
size (in nm), λ the wavelength (in nm), β is the full
width at half maxima and θ is the Bragg’s diffraction
angle. Crystallite size of
Pd NPs synthesized at RT and at 65 °C, corresponding to different
planes determined by the above formula has been shown in Figure b. From the graph, it has been found
that crystallite size corresponding to (111) and (222) planes are
larger than that of the rest of the planes at both temperatures, indicating
orientation of Pd NPs preferentially toward the {111} facet and that
the particle growth is anisotropic in shape at both temperatures.[32] Further the particle size determined is smaller
than those of the TEM and particle size distribution analyses probably
because of wide size distribution of the particles.
Figure 8
(a) XRD patterns and
(b) crystallite size corresponding to different
planes determined by the Debye–Scherrer formula of Pd NPs synthesized
at RT and at 65 °C.
(a) XRD patterns and
(b) crystallite size corresponding to different
planes determined by the Debye–Scherrer formula of Pd NPs synthesized
at RT and at 65 °C.Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherm plots have
been used to
evaluate the pore diameter (Dp) and the surface area
(S) of the Pd NPs formed at RT. From the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda
(BJH) method, an average pore diameter of DPNs has been found to be
24.29 nm (Figure a).
This result is indicative of its porous structure containing mesopores.
The specific surface area obtained by the BET method[33] (Figure b) was approximately 19.44 m2 g–1. Such
high surface area of Pd NPs indicates the presence of more catalytic
sites.
Figure 9
BJH plot (a) and N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm
(b) of Pd NPs synthesized at RT.
BJH plot (a) and N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm
(b) of Pd NPs synthesized at RT.It is well understood that the shape, size, surface
area, and charge
of the nanostructure affect the biological cell membrane interaction
and thus decide their biological applications.[34] It is reported that cellular uptake of Pd nanoparticles
are shape-dependent apart from the surface charge because of membrane
binding energy barriers during endocytosis are predominantly responsible
for the shape effect.[35] Hence, a better
understanding of shape evolution Pd nanoparticles would aid the development
of physicochemical and reaction parameters for generation of Pd nanoparticles
for effective biochemical applications.The inside atoms of
face-centered cubic metals (e.g., Pd) have
coordination number (CN) 12 while the atoms at the various low index
surfaces (e.g., {111}, {100}, and {110}) have the CN of 9, 8, and
7, respectively. The planar density of three surfaces increases in
the order {111} > {100} > {110}, and hence, the surface energy
increases
in the order γ{111} < γ{100} <
γ{110}.[36,37] When aqueous solution
of K2PdCl4 was treated with ascorbic acid in
the presence of surfactant PEG, the Pd2+ ion was readily
reduced to Pd(0) owing to the reaction.Here, [PdCl4]2– reduction takes place
using AA as a reductant via sonication. It is supposed that Pd nanoparticles
evolved following three steps: supersaturation of monomers, burnt
nucleation, and controlled growth according to the LaMer method.[38] In the prevailing reaction conditions when monomer
concentration increases steadily and reaches the stage of the critical
point of supersaturation, small clusters spontaneously separate, decreasing
the monomer concentration by nucleation. Now, concentration of the
monomer decreases below a critical concentration and the available
monomer is henceforth used for particle growth; however, during the
nucleation period, particle growth may also take place simultaneously.[39] Thus, to control size broadening of particles,
a short nucleation span and controlled growth kinetics should be maintained
which can be achieved by the presence of adsorbates, additives, or
surfactants in the reaction medium.When K2PdCl4 is reduced by AA in an aqueous
medium in the presence of PEG, truncated octahedron/fivefold twinned
pentagonal rodlike polyhedral structures enclosed by {111} and {100}
mixed facets are formed because {111} is the most stable facet followed
by {100} and then {110}. From a stability point of view only {111}
facet-terminating shapes like octahedral and tetrahedral seed should
be formed during the nucleation stage; however, according to Wulff’s
theory because the octahedron and tetrahedron have a larger surface
area than the cube per unit volume, the truncated octahedron, known
as Wulff’s polyhedron, nucleated at the most stable speed in
order to minimize both the surface area and interfacial face energy.[40] On increasing the reaction temperature at 65
°C the concentration of the monomer increases, thus increasing
the rate of reaction. Now, among the two facets {111} and {100} of
an octahedron, the {111} surface grows more rapidly than {100} because
of availability of higher monomer concentration at an elevated temperature.
Thus, thermodynamically stable and kinetically controlled hexagonal/trigonal
plate-like Pd NPs have been evolved at higher temperature 65 °C.
Molecular Docking Studies of Palladium Clusters
with DNA
Computational Details
Dataset
DNA: the PDB format file
of DNA sequences with PDB ID 1BNA was downloaded from RCSB Protein Data Bank.[41] Ligands and water molecules were removed from
the DNA sequence using CHIMERA.[42]Drugs: the structure of the Pd cluster was taken after optimization. Figure shows the chemical
structure of the cluster.
Molecular Docking
AutoDock 4.2
was used for molecular docking simulations using Lamarckian Genetic
Algorithm (LGA).[43] Docking was performed
using DNA sequences as a rigid receptor molecule, whereas the Pd cluster
was treated as a flexible ligand. The receptor and ligand files were
prepared for docking using AutoDockTools (ADT).[44] The grid box size was set at 50-50 and 100 Å for x, y and z, respectively,
and the grid center was set to 14.748, 20.984, and 8.809 for x, y, and z, respectively.
The Gasteiger charges were added to the complex by AutoDockTools (ADT)
before performing docking calculations. Lamarckian genetic algorithms,
as implemented in AutoDock, were employed to perform blind docking
calculations. For metal, modifications were done in the parameter
file to include Pd. The lowest energy docked confirmation, according
to the AutoDock scoring function, was selected as the binding mode
(Figure ).
Figure 10
Three dimensional
structure of the Pd-cluster.
Three dimensional
structure of the Pd-cluster.
Result
The figure shows the Minor
groove binding of the Pd cluster with 1BNA present in lung cancerA549 cell lines. The Pd cluster binds in the minor groove of the DNA
sequences concluding that the cluster is a minor groove binder. The
computationally calculated binding energy is −0.14 kcal/mol,
which indicates that it is an effective drug against cancer cells
(Figure ).
Figure 11
Minor groove
binding of the Pd cluster with 1BNA.
Minor groove
binding of the Pd cluster with 1BNA.
Molecular Docking Studies of Palladium Clusters
with Lung Cancer Proteins
DNA: the PDB format file
of proteins with PDB ID 2ITW, 2ITX, 2ITY, 2J6M, and 4LQM were downloaded
from RCSB Protein Data Bank.[45] These are
crystal structures of the EGFR kinase domain. Mutations in the EGFR
kinase are a cause of non-small cell lung cancer.[44] Ligands and water molecules were removed from each protein
using CHIMERA.[46]Drugs: the structure
of the Pd cluster was taken after optimization. Figure shows the chemical structure
of the cluster.AutoDock 4.2
was used for molecular docking simulations using Lamarckian Genetic
Algorithm (LGA).[43] The docking was performed
using protein as a rigid receptor molecule, whereas the Pd cluster
was treated as a flexible ligand. The receptor and ligand files were
prepared for docking using AutoDockTools (ADT).[44] Grid boxes of various dimensions were used to prepare grid
maps using Auto-Grid for each protein. The Gasteiger charges were
added to the complex by AutoDockTools (ADT) before performing docking
calculations. Lamarckian genetic algorithms, as implemented in AutoDock,
were employed to perform blind docking calculations. All the other
parameters were default settings. For metals, modifications were done
in the parameter file to include Pd. According to the AutoDock scoring
function, the lowest energy docked conformation was selected as the
binding mode.The computationally calculated
binding energies of all protein–drug complexes are given in Table . From the tabulated
data it is very much clear that binding energies of all EGFR proteins
with the Pd cluster are of the same range. The binding modes and geometrical
orientations of all the compounds were almost identical; suggesting
that all the inhibitors occupied a common cavity in the receptor.
The lowest binding energy is with the 2ITY complex. Molecular Docking gives the
best and stable conformations of the ligand with proteins in the receptor
active pocket. Figure shows interaction of the ligand with proteins.
Table 1
Binding Energies of Protein–Drug
Complexes
s. no
proteins
binding energies (kcal/mol)
1
2ITW
–0.44
2
2ITX
–0.46
3
2ITY
–0.48
4
2J6M
–0.42
5
4LQM
–0.44
Figure 12
Interaction of the Ag–Au
cluster with (a) 2ITW, (b) 2ITX,
(c) 2ITY, (d) 2J6M, and (e) 4LQM.
Interaction of the Ag–Au
cluster with (a) 2ITW, (b) 2ITX,
(c) 2ITY, (d) 2J6M, and (e) 4LQM.In silico studies revealed that the entire synthesized
molecule
showed good binding energy toward the target protein. The Pd cluster
binds in the pocket of the proteins (Table ).
Cytotoxicity
With a view of the above
fact, it is also necessary to observe the use of Pd nanoparticles
(formed at RT) in biochemical systems, we performed the cytotoxicity
effects using A-549humanlung cancer cells. The cytotoxicity result
was analyzed by plotting viability histogram, curve, and IC50 values. As per the data obtained from Figure , the positive control, that is, Adriamycin
kills all the cytotoxic cells at 10 μg/ml concentration indicating
that our cell culture experiment moved to a positive direction in
all respects.[47] It is found that the cell
viability is dose-dependent with noticeable changes in shape and size
from 10 to 30 μg/mL concentrations (Figures and 14).[48] The observed IC50 is ≤10 μg/mL, indicating good therapeutic efficacy
in the biological system, that is, against lung carcinoma. This action
may be because of the cytotoxic effect of the palladium nanoparticle
on the DNA (shown in the docking experiment in Figure ).[49] Cell viability
decreased with the increased concentration, which implies that our
synthesized compound may be active against lung cancer which is beneficial
for future drug-design perspectives.[50]
Figure 15
Cell viability curve: effect of dose of Pd NPs (synthesized
at
RT) and Adriamycin on A-549 human lung cancer cells.
Figure 13
Effect
of dose of Pd NPs (synthesized at RT) on cell viability
of A-549 human lung cancer cells.
Figure 14
Cell viability curve: effect of dose of Pd NPs (synthesized
at
RT) on A-549 human lung cancer cells.
Effect
of dose of Pd NPs (synthesized at RT) on cell viability
of A-549humanlung cancer cells.Cell viability curve: effect of dose of Pd NPs (synthesized
at
RT) on A-549humanlung cancer cells.Cell viability curve: effect of dose of Pd NPs (synthesized
at
RT) and Adriamycin on A-549humanlung cancer cells.
Conclusions
In summary, we have successfully
synthesized Pd nanoparticles of
different shapes and sizes, like 8–10 nm edge length truncated
octahedron/fivefold twinned pentagonal rods and 17–20 nm edge
length hexagonal/trigonal plates in an aqueous solution phase by reducing
K2PdCl4 with ascorbic acid in the presence of
surfactant PEG via a sonochemical method at RT. XRD study revealed
that particle growth took place anisotropically at both temperatures.
FTIR and SERS studies revealed adsorption of AA and PEG at NP’s
surface. The particle’s size distribution graph indicates formation
of particles having a wide size distribution while the zeta potential
value −13 mV indicated that the particle’s surface is
negatively charged and hence stable. The truncated octahedron/fivefold
twinned pentagonal rod-shaped Pd NPs formed at RT, while thermally
stable and kinetically controlled hexagonal/trigonal plate-like Pd
NPs, evolved at a higher temperature 65 °C. The obtained Pd NPs
has a high surface area and narrow pore size distribution. The computationally
calculated binding energy indicates that this Pd cluster is an effective
drug against cancer cells. The lowest binding energy is with the 2ITY complex. Molecular
Docking gives the best and stable conformations of the ligand with
proteins in the receptor active pocket. Biochemically, the effect
of PD NPs on A-549humanlung cancer cells exhibited that cytotoxicity
is dependent on the dose of NPs. The results described here indicate
much potential for use of these NPs in biomedical applications.
Authors: Eric F Pettersen; Thomas D Goddard; Conrad C Huang; Gregory S Couch; Daniel M Greenblatt; Elaine C Meng; Thomas E Ferrin Journal: J Comput Chem Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.376
Authors: Kyubin Shim; Jeonghun Kim; Yoon-Uk Heo; Bo Jiang; Cuiling Li; Mohammed Shahabuddin; Kevin C-W Wu; Md Shahriar A Hossain; Yusuke Yamauchi; Jung Ho Kim Journal: Chem Asian J Date: 2016-12-02
Authors: Stefanos Mourdikoudis; Mariana Chirea; Thomas Altantzis; Isabel Pastoriza-Santos; Jorge Pérez-Juste; Fernando Silva; Sara Bals; Luis M Liz-Marzán Journal: Nanoscale Date: 2013-04-23 Impact factor: 7.790