| Literature DB >> 31890740 |
Kanae Kawai1, Ryosuke Negoro2, Moe Ichikawa1, Tomoki Yamashita2, Sayaka Deguchi2, Kazuo Harada3, Kazumasa Hirata3, Kazuo Takayama1,2,4,5, Hiroyuki Mizuguchi1,2,5,6,7.
Abstract
Because many peptide and peptide-mimetic drugs are substrates of peptide transporter 1, it is important to evaluate the peptide transporter 1-mediated intestinal absorption of drug candidates in the early phase of drug development. Although intestinal cell lines treated with inhibitors of peptide transporter 1 are widely used to examine whether drug candidates are substrates for peptide transporter 1, these inhibitors are not sufficiently specific for peptide transporter 1. In this study, to generate a more precise evaluation model, we established peptide transporter 1-knockout induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) by using a CRISPR-Cas9 system and differentiated the cells into intestinal epithelial-like cells. The permeability value and uptake capacity of glycylsarcosine (substrate of peptide transporter 1) in peptide transporter 1-knockout intestinal epithelial-like cells were significantly lower than those in wild-type intestinal epithelial-like cells, suggesting that peptide transporter 1 was successfully depleted in the epithelial cells. Taken together, our model can be useful in the development of peptide and peptide-mimetic drugs.Entities:
Keywords: CRISPR-Cas9; PEPT1; SLC15A1; drug absorption; drug transporter; genome editing; human iPS cells; intestinal epithelial-like cells
Year: 2019 PMID: 31890740 PMCID: PMC6926248 DOI: 10.1016/j.omtm.2019.11.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev ISSN: 2329-0501 Impact factor: 6.698
Figure 1Generation of PEPT1-KO Human iPSCs
(A) The schematic overview shows the targeting strategy for PEPT1/SLC15A1. The PCR primers that can distinguish WT and mutant alleles are shown with red arrows. Donor plasmid: EF1α, elongation factor 1 alpha promoter; PuroR, puromycin resistant protein; pA, polyadenylation sequence; HDR, homology-directed repair. (B) The genotyping was performed in the PEPT1/SLC15A1 locus. (C) Sequencing analyses were performed to examine whether the PEPT1/SLC15A1-KO iPSC clone was correctly targeted. To confirm the DNA sequence, the PCR products were purified and subjected to sequencing analyses. The single-guide RNA (sgRNA)-targeting sequences are shown in red. (D) The gene expression levels of POU5F1, NANOG, and SOX2 in WT-iPSCs and PEPT1-KO iPSCs were examined by real-time RT-PCR analysis. The gene expression levels in the WT-iPSCs (WT) were taken as 1.0. Data represent the means ± SD (n = 8, technical replicate). (E) Immunostaining analysis of POU5F1 (red) was performed in the WT-iPSCs and PEPT1/SLC15A1-KO cells. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars represent 50 μm.
Figure 2Intestinal Differentiation Capacity of PEPT1-KO Human iPSCs
(A) The procedure for intestinal differentiation from human iPSCs is shown. (B) The gene expression levels of intestinal markers (VIL1, ISX, and SI) and PEPT1 in WT-iPSCs and PEPT1-KO iPSC-IECs were examined by real-time RT-PCR analysis. The gene expression levels in the WT iPSC-IECs were taken as 1.0. Data represent the means ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test (***p < 0.001). (C) The protein expression levels of PEPT1 and β-actin in WT iPSC-IECs and PEPT1-KO iPSC-IECs were examined by western blotting analysis. (D) The percentages of VIL1-positive cells and SI-positive cells in WT iPSC-IECs and PEPT1-KO iPSC-IECs were measured by FACS analysis. Data are presented as means ± SD (n ≥ 6, technical replicate). (E) Immunostaining analysis of VIL1 (red) was performed in WT iPSC-IECs and SLC15A1-KO iPSC-IECs. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars represent 50 μm. (F) The protein expression levels of VIL1 and β-actin in WT iPSC-IECs and PEPT1-KO iPSC-IECs were examined by western blotting analysis.
Figure 3Transcriptomic Analysis of PEPT1-KO iPSC-IECs
DNA microarray analysis was performed in WT iPSC-IECs and PEPT1-KO iPSC-IECs. (A) A scatterplot of the gene expression signals in WT iPSC-IECs and PEPT1-KO iPSC-IECs is shown. Red dots and blue dots indicate the genes whose expression levels were upregulated and downregulated more than 4-fold, respectively. (B) Expression levels of genes with the potential for off-target cleavage. The expression signal values of the 60 genes that had sequences similar (less than four mismatches) to the single-guide RNA (sgRNA) target sequence were extracted from the data generated using the microarray. The relative signal values of the genes in PEPT1-KO iPSC-IECs are shown with WT iPSC-IECs as 1.0. The data were obtained from one differentiation experiment.
Figure 4Transport Activity Evaluation of PEPT1/SLC15A1
(A) TEER values of the WT iPSC-IEC and PEPT1-KO iPSC-IEC monolayers were measured by Millicell-ERS2. Data are presented as means ± SD (n ≥ 10, technical replicate). (B) The Papp values of lucifer yellow in the WT iPSC-IEC and PEPT1-KO iPSC-IEC monolayers were measured. Data are presented as means ± SD (n ≥ 3, technical replicate). (C) The apical-to-basolateral permeability of glycylsarcosine across the WT iPSC-IEC and PEPT1-KO iPSC-IEC monolayers was measured. Data are presented as means ± SD (n = 3, technical replicate). (D) The glycylsarcosine uptake capacity in the WT iPSC-IECs and PEPT1-KO iPSC-IECs was examined. Data are presented as means ± SD (n ≥ 3, technical replicate). Statistical analyses were performed using the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test (*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001).