Literature DB >> 31889843

Screening for obesity in the offspring of first-cousin consanguineous couples: A Phase-I study in Saudi Arabia.

Khalid Khalaf Alharbi1, Yazeed A Al-Sheikh1, Muslim M Alsaadi2, Balavenkatesh Mani3, G K Udayaraja3, Muhammad Kohailan3, Imran Ali Khan1.   

Abstract

Consanguineous or cousin marriages are very common in Saudi Arabia. However, owing to limited studies and insufficient knowledge about genetic diseases/disorders, many couples are unaware of the increased health risks for their offspring. Among the inherited and complex diseases from parents' consanguinity, obesity is common; therefore, we examined the prevalence of obesity in the offspring of first-cousin consanguineous couples in Saudi Arabia. In this questionnaire-based study, 657 individuals (mean age = 18.7 ± 10.2 years; age range = 2-65 years) who were residing in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia participated. Among them, almost 90% were native Saudis. Participants mean body mass index (BMI) was 24.5 ± 9.1 kg/m2. Sex- stratified demographic details confirmed a significant association between age and BMI (p < .001). We confirmed that adolescents and adults were more prone to develop obesity. Adults and non-Saudi participants were three times more likely to develop obesity if they had first-cousin consanguineous parents than those who did not. Of the 30% of participants who were obese, 100 will be selected for Phase II, in which we plan to perform exome sequencing.
© 2019 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body mass index; Consanguinity; First-cousin parents; Obesity; Off spring; Saudi Arabia

Year:  2019        PMID: 31889843      PMCID: PMC6933162          DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci        ISSN: 2213-7106            Impact factor:   4.219


Introduction

Obesity is the result of fat storage that takes place naturally in the body due to a lack of exercise or an uncontrolled diet (Fitzpatrick et al., 2018). After some controversy, obesity has been confirmed as a human disease (Müller and Geisler, 2017). Obesity is defined as a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2. Obesity is caused by energy imbalance: when the energy gained from calories is greater than the energy expended from physical activity; the body stores the extra calories as fat (Alharbi et al., 2017). There is an increased prevalence of being overweight and obesity globally (Isakova et al., 2018). Per the World Health Organization (WHO), the global prevalence of obesity in adults is 13%, and it is 18% in children aged 5–19 years (Aguayo-Armendáriz et al., 2018). In gulf countries, the obesity prevalence is 5–14% in children and adolescents. Notably, the obesity prevalence in Riyadh, the capital city of Saudi Arabia, is 22% (Al-Ghamdi et al., 2018). Further, the highest global prevalence of obesity in women is in Saudi Arabia (Alharbi et al., 2017). Earlier genetic and non-genetic studies have confirmed obesity as a multifactorial/heterogeneous disorder (Lin et al., 2018) with a polygenic etiology (Aguayo-Armendáriz et al., 2018). Obesity leads to medical complications such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, stroke, coronary heart disease, cardiovascular disease, gall bladder disease, metabolic syndrome, pulmonary disease, osteoarthritis, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and cancers (Ben Halima et al., 2018). However, calorie-dense food and a sedentary lifestyle alone do not seem to explain this phenomenon in it’s entirely (Watanabe et al., 2018). Consanguinity implies the inheritance of genes that are inherited from common ancestors; it is a social and genetic concept that usually denotes reproductive association between closely related individuals (Verweij et al., 2014). Consanguineous marriages are very common in the Middle East, including Saudi Arabia (Bener et al., 2007). Although, the prevalence of consanguinity varies across populations, the rates are not well documented. Examining consanguineous families has played a key role in determining the genetic basis of several heritable diseases and researchers have gained insight into major molecular mechanisms governing physiological processes (Saeed et al., 2018). Consanguinity is defined as a biological relationship within a family. The marriage between a related man and woman is known as consanguineous marriage, and it has been practiced for thousands of years globally. Consanguinity is a deeply rooted social trend, and more than 1.2 billion of the world population are consanguineous couples. Globally, approximately 20% of marriages are consanguineous (Al-Mousa and Al-Saud, 2017), which are common for socio-economic, ethno-cultural, geographic, and religious reasons (Warsy et al., 2014). Recently, researchers have examined how consanguineous marriages are related to human health (Fareed and Afzal, 2017). Consanguineous marriages can lead to an increase in the frequency of homozygous genotypes, which allows the less common alleles to manifest as homozygous (Mokhtar and Abdel-Fattah, 2001). Risk of genetic disorders may be inherited among common ancestors due to the expression of autosomal recessive gene mutations. Problems occur because of the biological relationship between parents; therefore, there is an enhanced possibility that their offspring will inherit identical copies of detrimental recessive genes (Shawky et al., 2013). An earlier study Becker et al. (2001) confirmed that first-cousin consanguinity is significantly associated with congenital heart disease in Saudi Arabia. However, to date, no studies have examined the correlation between consanguinity and obesity. The lifestyle in Saudi Arabia has changed dramatically with the increase in wealth due to oil discovery. Further, Bosdou et al. (2016) confirmed the connection between obesity and infertility in consanguineous women; i.e., due to an elevated BMI, women’s hormone abnormalities and ovulation dysfunction can lead to infertility. Therefore, we examined the BMI and health-related characteristics of the offspring of first-cousin consanguineous couples.

Material and methods

Ethical approval (CAMS 01/3536) was granted from the College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University (KSU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. In this retrospective study, we collected data from 657 individuals living in Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia from February 2015 to December 2017. Specifically, participants were recruited from Sahara Mall, Saudi boys’ school, King Khalid University Hospitals, and KSU medical college. All participants completed the questionnaire and provided written consent. Inclusion criteria were based on the obese or non-obese offspring of consanguinity couples. Exclusion criteria were offspring of non-consanguineous couples and siblings of consanguineous couples. As per the WHO’s criteria (WHO, 2016), obese participants were categorized into three groups based on age: (i) childhood obesity (aged 0–4 years), (ii) adolescent obesity (aged 5–19 years) and adult obesity (aged ≥ 19 years). Childhood obesity was calculated as >3 standard deviations (SDs) for weight/height; for overweight, it was >2 SDs for weight/height. Adolescents’ obesity was calculated as >2 SDs as per the WHO growth reference median; overweight was BMI for age >1 SD above the WHO growth reference (WHO, 2016). For adults, a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 or ≥30 kg/m2 were categorized as overweight or obese, respectively. The study purpose was well explained in both Arabic and English. The questionnaire included the following anthropometric measurements: age, weight, height, BMI, nationality, and family history of consanguinity. Simultaneously, with trained nurses, we collected saliva samples from each patient to process genomic DNA. The structured questionnaire was finalized by three experts based on their experience. BMI was calculated as weight in kg and height in cm or meters squared (Alharbi et al., 2017).

Statistical analyses

Collected data were shifted to Excel and statistically analyzed using R software. Continuous data were presented as means and SDs; categorical data were obtained as frequencies and percentages (%). Independent sample t-tests and analyses of variance were used to determine the significant mean difference between groups. Chi-square tests were used to determine differences in proportions between categorical variables. Furthermore, a logistic regression analysis was used to determine the odds of being obese against potential risk factors. P < .05 was considered significant.

Results

Participants’ (N = 657) demographic characteristics are shown in Table 1. Table 2 describes participants’ demographic characteristics per sex. There were significant sex differences in age, height, BMI, and nationality. Weight, obesity, and having other diseases failed to show significant sex differences. Table 3 describes participants’ demographic characteristics per age. We found significant age differences for all key study variables. Table 4 describes participants’ demographic characteristics per whether they were obese. We found significant differences for all key study variables, except sex. Table 5 presents the risk factors for obesity. Adults were significantly more likely to be obese compared to adolescents and non-Saudis were 3 times more likely to have obesity as compared to Saudi participants. Figs. 1 and 2 (Supplementary files) represent the association between BMI and age across both sexes for those aged 2–19 years.
Table 1

Participants’ demographical details.

Demographic variablesMean ± standard deviation or n (%)
N657
Age (years) (range = 2–65 years)18.7 ± 10.2
Male376 (57.2)
Weight (kgs)59.6 ± 28.0
Height (cms)153.0 ± 20.0
Body mass index (kg/m2)24.5 ± 9.1
Saudi nationality589 (89.6%)
Obese193 (30.0)
Other diseases41 (6.2%)
Family history of consanguinity657 (100%)

Note: Data presented as Mean ± SD for continuous normal variables whereas categorical variables are presented as N (%). P-value < .05 considered significant.

Table 2

Descriptive statistics per sex.

Demographic detailsMale (n = 376)Female (n = 281)P value
Age (Years) (2–65)16.4 ± 8.021.7 ± 11.9<.001
Weight (kg)60.3 ± 28.458.7 ± 27.4.463
Height (cm)155.9 ± 19.9148.4 ± 18.4<.001
BMI (kg/m2)23.6 ± 8.125.7 ± 10.3.005
Saudi nationality347 (92.3)242 (86.1).010
Obesity103 (27.7)90 (33.1).140
Other diseases21 (5.6)20 (7.1).422
Family history of consanguinity376 (100)281 (100)

Note: Data presented as Mean ± SD for continuous normal variables whereas categorical variables are presented as N (%). P-value < .05 considered significant.

Table 3

Descriptive statistics per age groups.

Demographic detailsChild (0–4)Adolescent (5–19)Adult (>19)P Value
(n = 19; 2.9%)(n = 432; 65.8%)(n = 206; 31.4%)
Age (Years)3.4 ± 0.813.5 ± 3.6a30.9 ± 8.7ab<.001
Male8 (44.4)302 (69.9)a66 (32.0)b<.001
Weight (kgs)16.3 ± 3.752.0 ± 23.6a79.2 ± 25.9ab<.001
Height (cms)95.5 ± 13.7150.7 ± 18.7a161.5 ± 11.3ab<.001
BMI (kg/m2)19.5 ± 10.521.9 ± 6.9a30.4 ± 10.3ab<.001
Saudi Nationality12 (66.7)398 (92.1)a178 (86.4)<.001
Obesity5 (33.3)97 (22.7)a91 (45.0)ab<.001
Other diseases3 (16.7)14 (3.2)a24 (11.7)b<.001
Family history of consanguinity18 (100.0)432 (100.0)206 (100.0)

Note: Data presented as Mean ± SD for continuous normal variables whereas categorical variables are presented as N (%). P-value < .05 considered significant. aindicates significantly different from child; bindicates significantly different from adolescents and abindicates significant difference from both child and adolescent.

Table 4

Descriptive statistics according to Obesity status.

Demographic detailsObeseNon-ObeseP Value
n193 (30.0)451 (70.0)
Age (years)23.1 ± 12.516.8 ± 8.2<.001
Male103 (53.4)269 (59.6).140
Weight (kgs)86.7 ± 28.448.3 ± 18.1<.001
Height (cms)156.3 ± 19.4151.3 ± 19.3<.001
Body mass index (kg/m2)34.8 ± 9.220.1 ± 4.2.003
Saudi Nationality158 (81.9)422 (93.6).001
Other diseases19 (9.8)20 (4.4)<.001
Family history of consanguinity193 (100.0)451 (100.0)

Note: Data presented as Mean ± SD for continuous normal variables whereas categorical variables are presented as N (%). P-value < .05 considered significant.

Table 5

Risk factors as per obesity.

DemographicsOR (95% CI)P-value
Age
 Child (0–4 years)0.47 (0.15–1.48).196
 Adolescent (5–19 years)0.36 (0.24–0.54)<.001
 Adult (>19 years)Reference
Sex
 Male1.17 (0.80–1.72).417
 FemaleReference
Nationality
 Saudi0.32 (0.19–0.56)<.001
 Non-SaudiReference
Other disease
 Yes1.71 (0.85–3.42).131
 NoReference

Note. Data presented as Odds-ratio. P-value < .05 considered significant.

Participants’ demographical details. Note: Data presented as Mean ± SD for continuous normal variables whereas categorical variables are presented as N (%). P-value < .05 considered significant. Descriptive statistics per sex. Note: Data presented as Mean ± SD for continuous normal variables whereas categorical variables are presented as N (%). P-value < .05 considered significant. Descriptive statistics per age groups. Note: Data presented as Mean ± SD for continuous normal variables whereas categorical variables are presented as N (%). P-value < .05 considered significant. aindicates significantly different from child; bindicates significantly different from adolescents and abindicates significant difference from both child and adolescent. Descriptive statistics according to Obesity status. Note: Data presented as Mean ± SD for continuous normal variables whereas categorical variables are presented as N (%). P-value < .05 considered significant. Risk factors as per obesity. Note. Data presented as Odds-ratio. P-value < .05 considered significant.

Discussion

Obesity is a worldwide problem that affects both children and adults across both sexes (Azzeh et al., 2017). Obesity is defined as a complex, chronic, multifactorial disease caused by nutritional imbalance with or without genetic and endocrine-metabolic disorders (da Silva et al., 2018). The current study was designed as an initial screening of the offspring of first-cousin parents in Saudi Arabia. We revealed that 30% of the participants were obese. Adolescent and adult participants were prone to develop obesity based on their current BMIs. Since 1975, the prevalence of global obesity has tripled to 671 million in adults and 124 million in young people (aged 5–19 years) (Ells et al., 2018). Per the WHO (WHO, 2016), there are about 42 million overweight children aged younger than five years (Al Dhaifallah et al., 2015). Being overweight and obesity during childhood is associated with obesity in adulthood and a wide range of chronic diseases at a younger age such as cancer, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, sleep apnea, and musculoskeletal conditions (Villarosa et al., 2018). Prior studies have confirmed a strong association between consanguineous offspring and genetic disorders/diseases, especially compared with non-consanguineous couples (Alnaqeb et al., 2018), including being prone to cancer (Jastaniah et al., 2018). Earlier studies also documented that parental consanguinity can lead to many multiple diseases, further highlighting the need for the present study. Common most categories of consanguineous unions are defined as first-cousin union, due to the closest genetic/inherited connection between the couples which can leads to identical copies of damaging recessive alleles (Hosseinpour et al., 2016). Genetic background plays a major role in understanding any disease/metabolic pathways that regulate obesity (Speakman et al., 2011). Without the involvement of Mendelian inheritance, obesity has a strong connotation with genetics (Sheikh et al., 2017). Cytogenetic analysis cannot justify all human diseases; however, molecular genetics will be helpful for disease diagnosis and prediction, which will be useful for treatment selection and concern therapies. Prior to exome sequencing studies, candidate gene, case-control, family/hospital based, monogenic, meta-analysis, and genome wide association studies have confirmed the risk of obesity; however, they do not provide accurate information regarding diagnoses (Xia and Grant, 2013). Global studies have also failed to show the connection between disease-causing genes and genetics (Mehrad-Majd et al., 2018, Ritter et al., 2018). Exome sequencing can also enable sequencing of all protein-coding regions in the human genome. This powerful sequencing methodology can be a cost-effective tool for dismembering genetic and monogenetic diseases. The functional application of exome sequencing is reformed to discover the rare alleles in heritability of complex diseases and health-related traits (Bamshad et al., 2011). The initial success of the whole exome sequencing technique concerned inflammatory bowel disease, including identification of a rare variant, which was useful for diagnosis and treatment in infants (Warr et al., 2015). Erzurumluoglu et al. (2016) recommended that consanguineous offspring should be analyzed without clinical phenotypes to detect for specific genes dock mutations in the homozygous loss of proteins. The relationship between the offspring of first-cousin consanguinity and obesity has not been documented; however, other diseases have been recognized (Rudan et al., 2003, Stoltenberg et al., 1999). Although numerous global studies have examined child and adult obesity (e.g., Ahmad et al., 2018, Eldosouky et al., 2018, Ibrahim et al., 2017), limited genetic and non-genetic studies have addressed the Saudi Population (Alharbi et al., 2017, Al-Daghri et al., 2016, Alharbi et al., 2014). To date, no studies have examined first-cousin obesity/non-obesity offspring in the Saudi population. Strength of this study is that almost 90% of our participants were from Saudi, and this study was performed in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A limitation of this study was not examining family pedigree and other demographical details. We also did not recruit the offspring from second cousins. In conclusion, adolescent and adult participants were more prone to develop obesity than were children. Adult and non-Saudi offspring of first-cousin consanguineous parents were three times more likely to develop obesity than were their counterparts. Of the 30% of participants who were obese, 100 will be selected for Phase II, in which we plan to perform exome sequencing. Future studies should be conducted with other cultures. Consanguineous couples should seek genetic counseling to minimize any risks for their children.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  39 in total

1.  Consanguinity and advanced maternal age as risk factors for reproductive losses in Alexandria, Egypt.

Authors:  M M Mokhtar; M M Abdel-Fattah
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Consanguinity and recurrence risk of stillbirth and infant death.

Authors:  C Stoltenberg; P Magnus; A Skrondal; R T Lie
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Central obesity and body fat, but not body mass index, are associated with the Pro12Ala polymorphism in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ gene in a population with a high consumption of saturated and trans-fatty acids.

Authors:  Josefina Aguayo-Armendáriz; Maricela Montalvo-Corral; Karla A González-Martínez; María I Grijalva-Haro; Martha N Ballesteros-Vásquez; Graciela Caire-Juvera; Silvia Y Moya-Camarena
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  ASSESSMENT OF KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE AND PRACTICE TOWARDS CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGES AMONG A COHORT OF MULTIETHNIC HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS IN SAUDI ARABIA.

Authors:  Dhekra Alnaqeb; Hanan Hamamy; Amira M Youssef; Khalid Al-Rubeaan
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  2016-12-29

5.  Correlation between serum leptin and its gene expression to the anthropometric measures in overweight and obese children.

Authors:  Maha K Eldosouky; Azza M Abdu Allah; Abeer AbdElmoneim; Najat Saaeid Al-Ahmadi
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand)       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 1.770

6.  The FTO rs9939609 polymorphism and obesity risk in teens: Evidence-based meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tainara Emilia Rodrigues da Silva; Nayara Lopes Andrade; Daiane de Oliveira Cunha; Jacqueline Andréia Bernardes Leão-Cordeiro; Cesar Augusto Sam Tiago Vilanova-Costa; Antonio Márcio Teodoro Cordeiro Silva
Journal:  Obes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 2.288

7.  The association of genotype-based inbreeding coefficient with a range of physical and psychological human traits.

Authors:  Karin J H Verweij; Abdel Abdellaoui; Juha Veijola; Sylvain Sebert; Markku Koiranen; Matthew C Keller; Marjo-Riitta Järvelin; Brendan P Zietsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  The Interplay of Genetics and Environmental Factors in the Development of Obesity.

Authors:  Abu Baker Sheikh; Adeel Nasrullah; Shujaul Haq; Aisha Akhtar; Haider Ghazanfar; Amara Nasir; Rao M Afzal; Marvi M Bukhari; Ahtsham Yousaf Chaudhary; Syed W Naqvi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-07-06

Review 9.  The genetics of human obesity.

Authors:  Qianghua Xia; Struan F A Grant
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 10.  Importance of Genetic Studies in Consanguineous Populations for the Characterization of Novel Human Gene Functions.

Authors:  A Mesut Erzurumluoglu; Hashem A Shihab; Santiago Rodriguez; Tom R Gaunt; Ian N M Day
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 1.670

View more
  3 in total

1.  Family History, Consanguinity and Other Risk Factors Affecting the Prevalence of Prediabetes and Undiagnosed Diabetes Mellitus in Overweight and Obese Yemeni Adults.

Authors:  Butheinah A Al-Sharafi; Ahmed A Qais; Khalil Salem; Muneer O Bashaaib
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.168

2.  Screening of fluoride analysis as a biochemical parameter in the orthodontic treatment using fixed appliances.

Authors:  Nozha M Sawan; Afnan A Ben Gassem; Alhanoof Aldegheishem; Eman I Alsagob; Abeer A Alshami
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Independent case-control study in KCNJ11 gene polymorphism with Type 2 diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Nada Alqadri
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 4.052

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.