Literature DB >> 31888995

Extreme offspring ornamentation in American coots is favored by selection within families, not benefits to conspecific brood parasites.

Bruce E Lyon1, Daizaburo Shizuka2.   

Abstract

Offspring ornamentation typically occurs in taxa with parental care, suggesting that selection arising from social interactions between parents and offspring may underlie signal evolution. American coot babies are among the most ornamented offspring found in nature, sporting vividly orange-red natal plumage, a bright red beak, and other red parts around the face and pate. Previous plumage manipulation experiments showed that ornamented plumage is favored by strong parental choice for chicks with more extreme ornamentation but left unresolved the question as to why parents show the preference. Here we explore natural patterns of variation in coot chick plumage color, both within and between families, to understand the context of parental preference and to determine whose fitness interests are served by the ornamentation. Conspecific brood parasitism is common in coots and brood parasitic chicks could manipulate hosts by tapping into parental choice for ornamented chicks. However, counter to expectation, parasitic chicks were duller (less red) than nonparasitic chicks. This pattern is explained by color variation within families: Chick coloration increases with position in the egg-laying order, but parasitic eggs are usually the first eggs a female lays. Maternal effects influence chick coloration, but coot females do not use this mechanism to benefit the chicks they lay as parasites. However, within families, chick coloration predicts whether chicks become "favorites" when parents begin control over food distribution, implicating a role for the chick ornamentation in the parental life-history strategy, perhaps as a reliable signal of a chick's size or age.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American coot; conspecific brood parasitism; offspring ornamentation; parental choice; social selection

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31888995      PMCID: PMC6995015          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1913615117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  16 in total

1.  Allocare, predation risk, social structure and natal coat colour in anthropoid primates.

Authors:  C Ross; G Regan
Journal:  Folia Primatol (Basel)       Date:  2000 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Intrafamilial conflict and parental investment: a synthesis.

Authors:  Geoff A Parker; Nick J Royle; Ian R Hartley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  The evolution of female ornaments and weaponry: social selection, sexual selection and ecological competition.

Authors:  Joseph A Tobias; Robert Montgomerie; Bruce E Lyon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Sexual selection is a form of social selection.

Authors:  Bruce E Lyon; Robert Montgomerie
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Manipulative signals in family conflict? On the function of maternal yolk hormones in birds.

Authors:  Wendt Müller; C Kate M Lessells; Peter Korsten; Nikolaus von Engelhardt
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Coots use hatch order to learn to recognize and reject conspecific brood parasitic chicks.

Authors:  Daizaburo Shizuka; Bruce E Lyon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Maternal effects increase within-family variation in offspring survival.

Authors:  Wendy L Reed; Mark E Clark; Carol M Vleck
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  The evolution of begging: signaling and sibling competition.

Authors:  M A Rodríguez-Gironés; P A Cotton; A Kacelnik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Family dynamics through time: brood reduction followed by parental compensation with aggression and favouritism.

Authors:  Daizaburo Shizuka; Bruce E Lyon
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 9.492

10.  Carotenoid discrimination by the avian embryo: a lesson from wild birds.

Authors:  P F Surai; B K Speake; N A Wood; J D Blount; G R Bortolotti; N H Sparks
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.231

View more
  1 in total

1.  The mystery of ornate offspring.

Authors:  Douglas W Mock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.