Literature DB >> 31888350

Comparison of Vancomycin Area-Under-the-Curve Dosing Versus Trough Target-Based Dosing in Obese and Nonobese Patients With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Jordan R Covvey1, Olivia Erickson1,2, David Fiumara1,3, Kelly Mazzei1,4, Zachary Moszczenski1,5, Kelly Slipak1, Branden D Nemecek1,6, David E Zimmerman1,6, Anthony J Guarascio1,7.   

Abstract

Background: A vancomycin target of area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC:MIC) ratio ≥400 is recommended for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia. Objective: To evaluate vancomycin total daily dose (TDD) achieving trough targets versus a calculated strategy achieving AUC targets based on body mass index (BMI).
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed within a large hospital network. Patients with MRSA bacteremia were eligible if they received vancomycin with a steady-state trough (15-20 mg/L). Cockcroft-Gault was used to estimate creatinine clearance, calculating vancomycin clearance and AUC. Patients were stratified by BMI (less than/greater than 30 kg/m2). The primary outcome was vancomycin TDD for the trough-based strategy compared with an AUC-dosing strategy.
Results: A total of 119 patients were included, including 51 (42.9%) and 68 (57.1%) patients with high- and low-BMI, respectively. The TDD for trough-based dosing (2390.76 ± 1224.59 mg) differed significantly from AUC-based dosing (1985.07 ± 616.18 mg) across the cohort (P = 0.0014). For patients with high BMI, there was a significant difference (P < 0.0001) in TDD between trough (2637.25 ± 1327.89 mg) versus AUC (1918.71 ± 625.89 mg) strategies. No difference in TDD between dosing strategies was observed among low-BMI patients. Across all patients, 46 (38.7%) experienced acute kidney injury (AKI); high-BMI patients experienced higher rates of AKI compared with low-BMI patients (54.9 vs 26.5%; P = 0.002). Conclusions and Relevance: An AUC-based dosing strategy may reduce vancomycin TDD required for MRSA bacteremia compared with trough-based dosing, particularly for patients with higher BMI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  obesity; therapeutic drug monitoring; vancomycin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31888350     DOI: 10.1177/1060028019897100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  6 in total

1.  Acute Kidney Injury Associated with Area under the Curve versus Trough Monitoring of Vancomycin in Obese Patients.

Authors:  Heather D'Amico; Katie L Wallace; Donna Burgess; David S Burgess; Sarah Cotner; Ryan Mynatt; Nannan Li; Arnold Stromberg; Jeremy VanHoose
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 5.938

2.  Evaluation of traditional initial vancomycin dosing versus utilizing an electronic AUC/MIC dosing program.

Authors:  Kerri A Mcgrady; Makenzie Benton; Serina Tart; Riley Bowers
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2020-09-15

3.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Vancomycin in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Model Building and Parameter Optimization.

Authors:  Kui-Fen Ma; Yi-Xi Liu; Zheng Jiao; Jun-Hao Lv; Ping Yang; Jian-Yong Wu; Si Yang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  Individualized Vancomycin Dosing with Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Pharmacokinetic Consultation Service: A Large-Scale Retrospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Sang-Mi Kim; Hyun-Seung Lee; Na-Young Hwang; Kyunga Kim; Hyung-Doo Park; Soo-Youn Lee
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.162

5.  Analysis of Risk Factors Associated with Reduced Trough Concentrations of Vancomycin in Relation to Renal Function in a Tertiary Hospital in Japan.

Authors:  Shota Kashiwagura; Yasuhiro Kamioka; Masafumi Seki; Satoshi Koshika; Kouji Okada
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Vancomycin therapeutic monitoring by measured trough concentration versus Bayesian-derived area under the curve in critically ill patients with cancer.

Authors:  Aseel K AbuSara; Deema H Abdelrahman; Khader I Habash; Mohammad H Al-Shaer; Jennifer Le; Lama H Nazer
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2022-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.