Emily E Johnston1, Isaac Martinez2, Erin Currie3, Katharine E Brock4, Joanne Wolfe5. 1. Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA; Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. Electronic address: ejohnston@peds.uab.edu. 2. Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. 3. School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; Aflac Cancer & Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 5. Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Most of the 20,000 U.S. children dying of serious illnesses annually die in the hospital. It is unknown if this hospital death predominance reflects family wishes or systemic issues such as lack of hospice access. Hence, we need to better understand location of death preferences for children and their families. OBJECTIVE: To better understand location of death preferences in North America, we reviewed the literature to examine the evidence for and against home death in seriously ill children (0-18 years). METHODS: We searched English articles in PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase published during 2000-2018 for articles related to parental, child/adolescent, and provider preference for death location and articles that correlated death location with bereavement or quality of life outcomes. RESULTS: The search results (n = 877 articles and n = 58 abstracts of interest) were reviewed, and 34 relevant articles were identified. Parent, child, and provider preferences, bereavement outcomes, and associated factors all point to some preference for home death. These findings should be interpreted with several caveats: 1) many studies are small and prone to selection bias, 2) not all families prefer home death and some that do are not able to achieve home death due to inadequate home support, 3) studies of bereavement outcomes are lacking. CONCLUSION: Adequate resources are needed to ensure children can die in their chosen location-be that home, hospital, or free-standing hospice. This review highlights research areas needed to better understand death location preference and programs and policies that will support home death for those that desire it.
CONTEXT: Most of the 20,000 U.S. children dying of serious illnesses annually die in the hospital. It is unknown if this hospital death predominance reflects family wishes or systemic issues such as lack of hospice access. Hence, we need to better understand location of death preferences for children and their families. OBJECTIVE: To better understand location of death preferences in North America, we reviewed the literature to examine the evidence for and against home death in seriously ill children (0-18 years). METHODS: We searched English articles in PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase published during 2000-2018 for articles related to parental, child/adolescent, and provider preference for death location and articles that correlated death location with bereavement or quality of life outcomes. RESULTS: The search results (n = 877 articles and n = 58 abstracts of interest) were reviewed, and 34 relevant articles were identified. Parent, child, and provider preferences, bereavement outcomes, and associated factors all point to some preference for home death. These findings should be interpreted with several caveats: 1) many studies are small and prone to selection bias, 2) not all families prefer home death and some that do are not able to achieve home death due to inadequate home support, 3) studies of bereavement outcomes are lacking. CONCLUSION: Adequate resources are needed to ensure children can die in their chosen location-be that home, hospital, or free-standing hospice. This review highlights research areas needed to better understand death location preference and programs and policies that will support home death for those that desire it.
Authors: Verna Hendricks-Ferguson; Amy R Newman; Katharine E Brock; Joan E Haase; Jennifer L Raybin; Shermini Saini; Karen M Moody Journal: J Pediatr Nurs Date: 2021-08-25 Impact factor: 2.145
Authors: Katharine E Brock; Kristen E Allen; Erin Falk; Cristina Velozzi-Averhoff; Nicholas P DeGroote; Jeffrey Klick; Karen Wasilewski-Masker Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-08-11 Impact factor: 3.603