Literature DB >> 31887368

Challenges in the development and implementation of a healthcare system based extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) program for the treatment of out of hospital cardiac arrest.

Meshe Chonde1, Jeremiah Escajeda2, Jonathan Elmer3, Clifton W Callaway2, Frank X Guyette2, Arthur Boujoukos4, Penny L Sappington4, Anson J Smith5, Mark Schmidhofer5, Christopher Sciortino6, Robert L Kormos6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) can treat cardiac arrest refractory to conventional therapies. Many institutions are interested in developing their own ECPR program. However, there may be challenges in logistics and implementation. AIMS: The aim of our protocol was to demonstrate that an ECPR team was feasible within our healthcare system and that the identification of UPMC Presbyterian as a receiving center allowed for successful treatment within 30 min from EMS dispatch.
METHODS: We developed out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) ECPR protocols for Emergency Medical Services (EMS), EMS communications, and our in-hospital ECPR team. Inclusion criteria indentified patients with a potentially reversible arrest etiology and high probability of recoverable brain injury using a simple checklist: witnessed collapse, layperson CPR, initial shockable rhythm, and age 18-60 years. We trained local EMS crews to screen patients and reviewed the criteria with a Medic Command Physician prior to transport to our hospital.
RESULTS: From October 2015 to March 31st 2018, EMS treated 1165 EMS OHCA cases, transported 664 (57%) to a local hospital, and transported 120 (10%) to our institution. Of these, five (4.1%) patients underwent ECPR. Among excluded cases, 64 (53%) had nonshockable rhythms, 48 (40%) were unwitnessed arrests, 50 (42%) were over age 60 and the remaining 20 (17%) had no documented reasons for exclusion. For ECPR cases, median pre-hospital CPR duration was 26 [IQR 25-40] min. Four patients (80%) received mechanical CPR. Interval from arrest to arrival on scene was 5 [IQR 4-6] min and interval from radio call to activation of ECPR was 13 [IQR 7-21] min. Interval from EMS dispatch to departure from scene was 20 [IQR 19-21] min. Time from EMS dispatch to initiation of ECPR was 63 [IQR 59-69] min.
CONCLUSIONS: ECPR is an infrequent occurrence in EMS practice. Most apparently eligible patients did not get ECPR, highlighting the need for ongoing programmatic development, provider education, and qualitative work exploring barriers to implementation.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac arrest; Emergency medical services; Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR)

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31887368     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  2 in total

Review 1.  [Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions].

Authors:  Spyros D Mentzelopoulos; Keith Couper; Patrick Van de Voorde; Patrick Druwé; Marieke Blom; Gavin D Perkins; Ileana Lulic; Jana Djakow; Violetta Raffay; Gisela Lilja; Leo Bossaert
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 0.826

2.  The feasibility of emergency medical technicians performing intermittent high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Chun-Hao Chang; Yi-Ju Hsu; Fang Li; Yuan-Shuo Chan; Ching-Ping Lo; Guan-Jian Peng; Chin-Shan Ho; Chi-Chang Huang
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.738

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.