Kristin Mattocks1,2, Marc I Rosen3,4, John Sellinger3,4, Tu Ngo5, Brad Brummett1, Diana M Higgins6,7, Thomas E Reznik8,9, Paul Holtzheimer10,11, Alicia M Semiatin12, Todd Stapley13, Steve Martino3,4. 1. VA Central Western Massachusetts Healthcare System, Leeds, Massachusetts. 2. University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts. 3. VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut. 4. Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. 5. Bedford VA Medical Center, Bedford, Massachusetts. 6. VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts. 7. Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. 8. Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island. 9. Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. 10. White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont. 11. Dartmouth School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire. 12. VA Manchester Medical Center, Manchester, New Hampshire. 13. VA Maine Medical Center, Togus, Maine, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Over the past decade, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has experienced a sizeable shift in its approach to pain. The VA's 2009 Pain Management Directive introduced the Stepped Care Model, which emphasizes an interdisciplinary approach to pain management involving pain referrals and management from primary to specialty care providers. Additionally, the Opioid Safety Initiative and 2017 VA/Department of Defense (DoD) clinical guidelines on opioid prescribing set a new standard for reducing opioid use in the VA. These shifts in pain care have led to new pain management strategies that rely on multidisciplinary teams and nonpharmacologic pain treatments. The goal of this study was to examine how the cultural transformation of pain care has impacted providers, the degree to which VA providers are aware of pain care services at their facilities, and their perceptions of multidisciplinary care and collaboration across VA disciplines. METHODS: We conducted semistructured phone interviews with 39 VA clinicians in primary care, mental health, pharmacy, and physical therapy/rehabilitation at eight Veterans Integrated Service Network medical centers in New England. RESULTS: We identified four major themes concerning interdisciplinary pain management approaches: 1) the culture of VA pain care has changed dramatically, with a greater focus on nonpharmacologic approaches to pain, though many "old school" providers continue to prefer medication options; 2) most facilities in this sample have no clear roadmap about which pain treatment pathway to follow, with many providers unaware of what treatment to recommend when; 3) despite multiple options for pain treatment, VA multidisciplinary teams generally work together to ensure that veterans receive coordinated pain care; and 4) veteran preferences for care may not align with existing pain care pathways. CONCLUSIONS: The VA has shifted its practices regarding pain management, with a greater emphasis on nonpharmacologic pain options. The proliferation of nonpharmacologic pain management strategies requires stakeholders to know how to choose among alternative treatments. 2019 American Academy of Pain Medicine. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.
OBJECTIVE: Over the past decade, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has experienced a sizeable shift in its approach to pain. The VA's 2009 Pain Management Directive introduced the Stepped Care Model, which emphasizes an interdisciplinary approach to pain management involving pain referrals and management from primary to specialty care providers. Additionally, the Opioid Safety Initiative and 2017 VA/Department of Defense (DoD) clinical guidelines on opioid prescribing set a new standard for reducing opioid use in the VA. These shifts in pain care have led to new pain management strategies that rely on multidisciplinary teams and nonpharmacologic pain treatments. The goal of this study was to examine how the cultural transformation of pain care has impacted providers, the degree to which VA providers are aware of pain care services at their facilities, and their perceptions of multidisciplinary care and collaboration across VA disciplines. METHODS: We conducted semistructured phone interviews with 39 VA clinicians in primary care, mental health, pharmacy, and physical therapy/rehabilitation at eight Veterans Integrated Service Network medical centers in New England. RESULTS: We identified four major themes concerning interdisciplinary pain management approaches: 1) the culture of VA pain care has changed dramatically, with a greater focus on nonpharmacologic approaches to pain, though many "old school" providers continue to prefer medication options; 2) most facilities in this sample have no clear roadmap about which pain treatment pathway to follow, with many providers unaware of what treatment to recommend when; 3) despite multiple options for pain treatment, VA multidisciplinary teams generally work together to ensure that veterans receive coordinated pain care; and 4) veteran preferences for care may not align with existing pain care pathways. CONCLUSIONS: The VA has shifted its practices regarding pain management, with a greater emphasis on nonpharmacologic pain options. The proliferation of nonpharmacologic pain management strategies requires stakeholders to know how to choose among alternative treatments. 2019 American Academy of Pain Medicine. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.
Authors: Walid F Gellad; Francesca E Cunningham; Chester B Good; Joshua M Thorpe; Carolyn T Thorpe; Brandi Bair; KatieLynn Roman; Susan L Zickmund Journal: Med Care Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Matthew J Bair; Dennis Ang; Jingwei Wu; Samantha D Outcalt; Christy Sargent; Carol Kempf; Amanda Froman; Arlene A Schmid; Teresa M Damush; Zhangsheng Yu; Louanne W Davis; Kurt Kroenke Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Aleksandra E Zgierska; Cindy A Burzinski; Jennifer Cox; John Kloke; Aaron Stegner; Dane B Cook; Janice Singles; Shilagh Mirgain; Christopher L Coe; Miroslav Bačkonja Journal: Pain Med Date: 2016-03-10 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Yuhua Bao; Katherine Wen; Phyllis Johnson; Philip J Jeng; Zachary F Meisel; Bruce R Schackman Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Kristin M Mattocks; Aimee Kroll-Desrosiers; Rebecca Kinney; Anashua R Elwy; Kristin J Cunningham; Michelle A Mengeling Journal: Med Care Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Lori A Bastian; Steven P Cohen; Lily Katsovich; William C Becker; Bradley R Brummett; Diana J Burgess; Andrea E Crunkhorn; Lauren M Denneson; Joseph W Frank; Christine Goertz; Brian Ilfeld; Kathryn E Kanzler; Akshaya Krishnaswamy; Kathryn LaChappelle; Steve Martino; Kristin Mattocks; Cindy A McGeary; Thomas E Reznik; Daniel I Rhon; Stacie A Salsbury; Karen H Seal; Alicia M Semiatin; Marlena H Shin; Corey B Simon; Deydre S Teyhen; Kara Zamora; Robert D Kerns Journal: Pain Med Date: 2020-12-12 Impact factor: 3.637
Authors: Steven Z George; Cynthia J Coffman; Kelli D Allen; Trevor A Lentz; Ashley Choate; Adam P Goode; Corey B Simon; Janet M Grubber; Heather King; Chad E Cook; Francis J Keefe; Lindsay A Ballengee; Jennifer Naylor; Joseph Leo Brothers; Catherine Stanwyck; Aviel Alkon; Susan N Hastings Journal: Pain Med Date: 2020-12-12 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Joseph Ali; Alison F Davis; Diana J Burgess; Daniel I Rhon; Robert Vining; Stacey Young-McCaughan; Sean Green; Robert D Kerns Journal: Learn Health Syst Date: 2021-10-19
Authors: Alireza Boloori; Bengt B Arnetz; Frederi Viens; Taps Maiti; Judith E Arnetz Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 3.390