Literature DB >> 28221274

Pharmacy Use in the First Year of the Veterans Choice Program: A Mixed-methods Evaluation.

Walid F Gellad1, Francesca E Cunningham, Chester B Good, Joshua M Thorpe, Carolyn T Thorpe, Brandi Bair, KatieLynn Roman, Susan L Zickmund.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Veterans Choice Program (VCP) was created to ensure timely access to health care in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Under this program, medications may be ordered by select non-VA clinicians to be dispensed by VA pharmacies, creating new challenges in ensuring medication safety.
OBJECTIVES: To examine pharmaceutical use during the first year of the VCP and to understand barriers and facilitators for VA pharmacists to dispensing medications under the VCP. STUDY
DESIGN: Mixed-methods evaluation.
METHODS: We captured all prescriptions dispensed through the VCP and described the demographics of VCP users and their medications. We also conducted semistructured interviews of VA pharmacists, focusing on VA formulary management and experiences dispensing opioid and hepatitis C (HCV) medications. Codebook development and coding followed iterative qualitative methods.
RESULTS: Overall, 17,346 Veterans received 56,426 VCP prescriptions from November 7, 2014 through November 7, 2015. The total medication cost was $27 million, 90% of which was for only 2772 HCV prescriptions. Topical eye drops and opioids represented the most commonly dispensed prescriptions (15.6% and 9.2% of all prescriptions, respectively). Pharmacists reported numerous challenges to dispensing VCP medications, including time required to contact non-VA clinicians about formulary issues, requiring controlled substance prescriptions to be hand delivered to VA pharmacies, and lack of access to laboratory data required to safely dispense medications.
CONCLUSIONS: HCV-related medication costs predominated the first year of VCP, but this is likely to change going forward. The safe use of opioids, efficient management of nonformulary medications, and unintended new barriers to access created by the VCP must be addressed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28221274     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  17 in total

1.  Comparing cataract surgery complication rates in veterans receiving VA and community care.

Authors:  Amy K Rosen; Megan E Vanneman; William J O'Brien; Suzann Pershing; Todd H Wagner; Erin Beilstein-Wedel; Jeanie Lo; Qi Chen; Glenn C Cockerham; Michael Shwartz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Recommendations for the Evaluation of Cross-System Care Coordination from the VA State-of-the-art Working Group on VA/Non-VA Care.

Authors:  Kristin M Mattocks; Kristin Cunningham; A Rani Elwy; Erin P Finley; Clinton Greenstone; Michelle A Mengeling; Steven D Pizer; Megan E Vanneman; Michael Weiner; Lori A Bastian
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Veterans' Reliance on VA Care by Type of Service and Distance to VA for Nonelderly VA-Medicaid Dual Enrollees.

Authors:  Jean Yoon; Megan E Vanneman; Sharon K Dally; Amal N Trivedi; Ciaran S Phibbs
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Capsule Commentary on Zickmund et al., Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Equity in Veteran Satisfaction with Health Care in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.

Authors:  Kathleen A McGinnis
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Pay-for-Performance and Veteran Care in the VHA and the Community: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Karli K Kondo; Jessica Wyse; Aaron Mendelson; Gabriella Beard; Michele Freeman; Allison Low; Devan Kansagara
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Guideline-concordant initiation of oral anticoagulant therapy for stroke prevention in older veterans with atrial fibrillation eligible for Medicare Part D.

Authors:  Nicolae Done; Amanda M Roy; Yingzhe Yuan; Steven D Pizer; Adam J Rose; Julia C Prentice
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-11-11       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Veteran Satisfaction with Early Experiences of Health Care Through the Veterans Choice Program: a Concurrent Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Audrey L Jones; Michael J Fine; Roslyn A Stone; Shasha Gao; Leslie R M Hausmann; Kelly H Burkitt; Peter A Taber; Galen E Switzer; Chester B Good; Megan E Vanneman; Susan L Zickmund
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Physicians' Perspectives Regarding Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Use Within the Department of Veterans Affairs: a Multi-State Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Thomas R Radomski; Felicia R Bixler; Susan L Zickmund; KatieLynn M Roman; Carolyn T Thorpe; Jennifer A Hale; Florentina E Sileanu; Leslie R M Hausmann; Joshua M Thorpe; Katie J Suda; Kevin T Stroupe; Adam J Gordon; Chester B Good; Michael J Fine; Walid F Gellad
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Primary care physicians' perspectives on Veterans who obtain prescription opioids from multiple healthcare systems.

Authors:  Felicia R Bixler; Thomas R Radomski; Susan L Zickmund; KatieLynn M Roman; Leslie R M Hausmann; Carolyn T Thorpe; Jennifer A Hale; Florentina E Sileanu; Walid F Gellad
Journal:  J Opioid Manag       Date:  2019 May/Jun

10.  A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Providers' Experiences with the Veterans Choice Program.

Authors:  Andrea L Nevedal; Todd H Wagner; Laura S Ellerbe; Steven M Asch; Christopher J Koenig
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.