| Literature DB >> 31885826 |
James H Doroshow1,2,3.
Abstract
In this investigation, we examined the effect of anthracycline antibiotics on oxygen radical metabolism in Ehrlich tumor cells. In tumor microsomes and nuclei, doxorubicin increased superoxide anion production in a dose-dependent fashion that appeared to follow saturation kinetics; the apparent K m and V max for superoxide formation by these organelles was 124.9 μM and 22.6 nmol/min/mg, and 103.4 μM and 4.8 nmol/min/mg, respectively. In both tumor microsomes and nuclei, superoxide formation required NADPH as a cofactor, was accompanied by the formation of hydrogen peroxide, and resulted from the transfer of electrons from NADPH to the doxorubicin quinone by NADPH:cytochrome P-450 reductase (NADPH:ferricytochrome oxidoreductase, EC 1.6.2.4). Anthracycline antibiotics also significantly enhanced superoxide anion production by tumor mitochondria with an apparent K m and V max for doxorubicin of 123.2 μM and 14.7 nmol/min/mg. However, drug-stimulated superoxide production by mitochondria required NADH and was increased by rotenone, suggesting that the proximal portion of the electron transport chain in tumor cells was responsible for reduction of the doxorubicin quinone at this site. The net rate of drug-related oxygen radical production was also determined for intact Ehrlich tumor cells; in this system, treatment with doxorubicin produced a dose-related increase in cyanide-resistant respiration that was enhanced by changes in intracellular reducing equivalents. Finally, we found that in the presence of iron, treatment with doxorubicin significantly increased the production of formaldehyde from dimethyl sulfoxide, an indication that the hydroxyl radical could be produced by intact tumor cells following anthracycline exposure. These experiments suggest that the anthracycline antibiotics are capable of significantly enhancing oxygen radical metabolism in Ehrlich tumor cells at multiple intracellular sites by reactions that could contribute to the cytotoxicity of this class of drugs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31885826 PMCID: PMC6914999 DOI: 10.1155/2019/9474823
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Kinetic constants for superoxide production by Ehrlich tumor subcellular fractions after treatment with doxorubicin. Superoxide production by tumor microsomes, mitochondria, and nuclei was assayed as described in Tables 2, 6, and 7. Kinetic constants were determined in triplicate to form the direct equation relating reaction velocity to substrate concentration as described in [48] using 8 different drug concentrations over a 10-fold concentration range.
| Subcellular fraction | Superoxide formation | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| Microsomes | 124.9 | 22.6 |
| Mitochondria | 123.2 | 14.7 |
| Nuclei | 103.4 | 4.8 |
Requirements for doxorubicin-stimulated superoxide formation in the tumor microsomal fraction. Superoxide production in tumor microsomes was determined in paired, 1 ml reaction mixtures which contained 150 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 100 μM EDTA, 56 μM acetylated cytochrome c, 200 μg of microsomal protein, and either 0 or 10 μg of SOD. The chemotherapeutic agent was added to the paired reaction mixtures, where specified, before the initiation of the reaction by addition of NADPH (1 mM).
| Experimental system | Superoxide production |
|---|---|
| nmol cytochrome c reduced/min/mg | |
| Control | 0.51 ± 0.26 (3)a |
| -Microsomes | N.D. (3)b |
| -NADPH | N.D. (3) |
| -Cytochrome c | N.D. (3) |
| Using NADPH (100 | N.D. (3) |
| Using NADH (1 mM) rather than NADPH | 0.97 ± 0.28 (3) |
| Doxorubicin (135 | 14.71 ± 1.43 (6)c |
| -Microsomes | N.D. (3)d |
| -NADPH | N.D. (3)d |
| -Cytochrome c | N.D. (3)d |
| Using heat-denatured microsomese | N.D. (3)d |
| Using heat-denatured SODe | 13.77 ± 0.37 (3) |
| Using NADPH (100 | 10.07 ± 0.82 (6) |
| Using NADH (1 mM) rather than NADPH | 2.81 ± 0.56 (3)d |
| Using NADP+ (1 mM) rather than NADPH | 1.35 ± 0.26 (3)d |
| Using NAD+ (1 mM) rather than NADPH | 0.36 ± 0.26 (3)d |
| Using FAD (1 mM)f rather than NADPH | 0.49 ± 0.49 (3)d |
| Using FMN (1 mM)f | N.D. (3)d |
| +DMSO (13 mM) | 16.32 ± 0.51 (3) |
| +Catalase (1500 units) | 14.36 ± 0.08 (3) |
| +Dicumarol (10 | 14.41 ± 1.91 (3) |
aMean ± S.E.; number in parentheses is number of experiments performed; bN.D. is not detectable; csignificantly different from control (P < 0.001); dsignificantly different from complete system containing NADPH and doxorubicin (P < 0.01); emicrosomes or SOD heated for 60 min in a boiling water bath; samples containing heat-denatured SOD were paired against identical mixtures with native dismutase; fFAD: flavin adenine dinucleotide; FMN: flavin mononucleotide.
Effect of anthracycline antibiotics on superoxide production by the tumor microsomal fraction. Superoxide production in tumor microsomes was determined as described in Table 2. For these studies, all drugs were present at a concentration of 135 μM.
| Drug | Superoxide formation (nmol/min/mg) |
|---|---|
| Daunorubicin | 10.00 ± 1.02 (5)a,b |
| Rubidazone | 6.66 ± 0.84 (6)b |
| Aclacinomycin A | 16.14 ± 0.85 (3)b |
| 5-Iminodaunorubicin | 0.45 ± 0.15 (3) |
aMean ± S.E.; number in parentheses is number of experiments performed; bsignificantly higher than the control rate of superoxide formation in tumor microsomes (P < 0.01; Table 2).
Effect of inhibitors of NADPH:cytochrome p-450 reductase on superoxide formation in tumor microsomes. NADPH:cytochrome P-450 reductase was assayed at 30°C as described in Materials and Methods using nonacetylated cytochrome c and 200 μg of microsomal protein per ml. Reactions were initiated with 100 nmol of NADPH. Where indicated, the reaction mixtures were preincubated with DTNB or NADP+ for 2 min prior to the initiation of cytochrome c reduction. In these experiments, superoxide production was assessed as described in Table 2 except that the NADPH concentration was 100 μM rather than 1 mM.
| Experimental system | NADPH:cytochrome P-450 reductase activity (nmol/min/mg) | Superoxide production (nmol/min/mg) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 233.5 ± 12.5 (3)a | |
| +DTNB (100 | 54.1 ± 1.6 (3)b | |
| +NADP+ (1 mM) | 64.6 ± 1.5 (3)b | |
| Doxorubicin (135 | 10.1 ± 1.0 (3) | |
| +DTNB (100 | 4.2 ± 0.4 (3)b | |
| +NADP+ (1 mM) | 2.7 ± 0.2 (3)b |
aMean ± S.E.; numbers in parentheses are numbers of experiments; bsignificantly different from samples without inhibitor present (P < 0.01).
Antioxidant enzyme levels in tumor subcellular fractions. Ehrlich tumor microsomes, mitochondria, and nuclei were prepared and assayed for glutathione peroxidase and SOD activity as described in Materials and Methods. The “cytosol” fraction was the supernatant from the final 65,000 x g centrifugation step used in the preparation of the microsomal fraction. Before determination of enzyme activity, the mitochondrial fraction was exposed to ultrasonic disruption on ice with 4 bursts of 15 sec each at 90 watts output to eliminate permeability barriers to appropriate substrates in these assays. The supernatant and pellet resulting from centrifugation of the sonicated mitochondria at 105,000 x g and 4°C for 60 min were also assayed from enzyme activities.
| Tumor cell fraction | Glutathione peroxidase (nmol/min/mg) | SOD ( |
|---|---|---|
| Cytosol | 211.6 ± 11.0 (4)a | 8.1 ± 0.8 (3) |
| Microsomes | 22.5 ± 1.6 (4) | 1.4 ± 0.3 (3) |
| Nuclei | 10.1 ± 2.2 (3) | 0.5 ± 0.1 (3) |
| Mitochondria | 55.5 ± 8.0 (3) | 5.6 ± 0.3 (3) |
| 105,000 x | 197.9 ± 20.9 (3) | 3.2 ± 0.4 (3) |
| 105,000 x | N.D. (3)b | 1.6 ± 0.2 (3) |
aMean ± S.E.; numbers in parentheses are numbers of experiments; bN.D. is not detectable.
Figure 1Effect of doxorubicin on oxygen consumption by Ehrlich tumor organelles. Oxygen consumption in tumor microsomes was examined as described in Supplementary . (a, i) is without drug; (ii) shows the results with doxorubicin. The addition of NADPH (1 mM), catalase (4500 units), or doxorubicin (135 μM) to the 3 ml vessel was performed through the access slot of the oxygen electrode and has been indicated (arrow). The numbers above each tracing indicate the rate of oxygen consumption (nmol/min/mg). (b) Effect of doxorubicin on oxygen consumption by Ehrlich tumor mitochondria. Oxygen consumption in these representative experiments was performed as described in Supplementary . (i) is the control reaction; (ii) represents the identical experiment in the presence of doxorubicin (135 μM). The addition of catalase (4500 units) to the 3 ml vessel was performed through the access slot of the oxygen electrode and has been indicated by the arrow. The numbers above each tracing indicate the rate of oxygen consumption (nmol/min/mg). (c) Effect of doxorubicin on oxygen consumption by Ehrlich tumor nuclei. Experimental conditions consisted of a 3 ml system containing 250 mM sucrose, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 100 μM EDTA, 1 mM NADPH, and 200 μg/ml of nuclear protein at 37°C. The addition of NADPH (1 mM), doxorubicin (135 μM), or catalase (4500 units) to the 3 ml reaction vessel was performed through the access slot of the oxygen electrode and has been indicated by an arrow. The number above the tracing is the rate of oxygen consumption (nmol/min/mg). (d) Doxorubicin-stimulated oxygen consumption by Ehrlich tumor cells. The effect of doxorubicin (400 μM) on oxygen consumption by Ehrlich cells (5 × 106 cells/ml) is shown in representative examples from multiple experiments. The addition of acetylated cytochrome c (168 nmol) in (i) or catalase (9000 units) in (ii) to the 3 ml vessel has been indicated by an arrow. The numbers above each tracing indicate the rate of oxygen consumption (nmol/min/ml).
Requirements for anthracycline-enhanced superoxide anion production by the tumor mitochondrial fraction. Superoxide formation in the tumor mitochondrial fraction was examined using paired, 1 ml reaction mixtures containing 250 mM sucrose, 20 mM HEPES, pH 8.2, 100 μM EDTA, 56 μM acetylated cytochrome c 100 μg of mitochondrial protein, and either 0 or 10 μg of SOD. The reaction mixture was preincubated for 5 min at 37° with 4 μM rotenone before initiation of the reaction with 100 μM NADH.
| Reaction mixture | Superoxide production (nmol/min/mg) |
|---|---|
| Control | 1.12 ± 0.15 (7)a |
| -NADH | N.D. (3)b |
| -Mitochondrial fraction | N.D. (3) |
| -Rotenone | 1.02 ± 0.01 (3) |
| Using NADPH (100 | 0.77 ± 0.26 (3) |
| Doxorubicin (135 | 7.29 ± 0.61 (10)c |
| -NADH | 0.97 ± 0.05 (3)d |
| -Mitochondrial fraction | 0.61 ± 0.20 (3)d |
| Using heat-denatured mitochondria | 1.28 ± 0.56 (3)d |
| -Rotenone | 5.00 ± 0.36 (3)d |
| Using NADPH (100 | 2.76 ± 0.44 (3)d |
| -Acetylated cytochrome c | N.D. (3)d |
| -EDTA | 5.51 ± 1.22 (3) |
| Using heat-denatured SOD | 5.10 ± 0.61 (3) |
| Daunorubicin (135 | 6.38 ± 1.63 (3)c |
| Rubidazone (135 | 5.71 ± 1.02 (3)c |
| Aclacinomycin A (135 | 3.32 ± 0.31 (3)c |
| 5-Iminodaunorubicin (135 | 0.51 ± 0.15 (3) |
aMean ± S.E.; numbers in parentheses are numbers of experiments; bN.D. is not detectable; csignificantly different from control (P < 0.01); dsignificantly different from complete system containing doxorubicin alone (P < 0.01).
Requirements for anthracycline-stimulated superoxide formation by the nuclear fraction. Superoxide formation by tumor nuclei was examined using paired 1 ml reaction mixtures containing 250 mM sucrose, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 100 μM EDTA, 56 μM acetylated cytochrome c, 200 μg of nuclear protein, and either 0 or 10 μg of SOD. The reaction was carried out at 37°C and was initiated by the addition of 1 mM NADPH after the chemotherapeutic agent was added.
| Reaction mixture | Superoxide formation (nmol/min/mg) |
|---|---|
| Control | 0.36 ± 0.05 (7)a |
| Using NADH (1 mM) rather than NADPH | 0.28 ± 0.08 (3) |
| Doxorubicin (135 | 3.29 ± 0.33 (12)b |
| -NADPH | N.D. (3)c,d |
| -Acetylated cytochrome c | N.D. (3)d |
| Using heat-denatured nuclei | N.D. (3)d |
| Using NADH (1 mM) rather than NADPH | 0.31 ± 0.15 (3)d |
| +Heat-denatured SOD | 2.73 ± 0.31 (3) |
| +DMSO (13 mM) | 4.21 ± 0.13 (3) |
| +Catalase (1500 units/ml) | 3.70 ± 0.13 (3) |
| Using FAD (1 mM) rather than NADPH | N.D. (3)d |
| Using FMN (1 mM) rather than NADPH | N.D. (3)d |
| Daunorubicin (135 | 6.63 ± 0.64 (3)b |
| Rubidazone (135 | 3.01 ± 0.31 (3)b |
| Aclacinomycin A (135 | 5.53 ± 0.38 (3)b |
aMean ± S.E.; numbers in parentheses are numbers of experiments; bsignificantly different from control (P < 0.01); cN.D. is not detectable; dsignificantly different from complete system containing doxorubicin alone (P < 0.01).
Effect of anthracycline antibiotics on oxygen consumption by Ehrlich tumor cells. Oxygen consumption by Ehrlich cells was examined at 37°C as described in Materials and Methods; the total 3 ml volume contained 1.5 × 107 tumor cells and the final KCN concentration, where used, was 2 mM.
| Reaction system | Oxygen consumption (nmol O2/min/5 × 106 cells) | |
|---|---|---|
| +KCN | -KCN | |
| Control | 0.54 ± 0.04a | 9.37 ± 0.52 |
| +BCNU (100 | 0.58 ± 0.08 | 9.56 ± 0.80 |
| +Glucose (10 mM) | 0.58 ± 0.10 | 9.67 ± 0.90 |
| +Antimycin A (10 | 0.50 ± 0.10 | |
| -Cells | N.D.b | |
| Doxorubicin (90 | 0.86 ± 0.02c | 10.00 ± 1.20 |
| Doxorubicin (200 | 1.04 ± 0.12c | 11.46 ± 1.18 |
| Doxorubicin (400 | 1.13 ± 0.04c | 8.82 ± 0.22 |
| +BCNU (100 | 1.39 ± 0.08d | — |
| +Adenosine (1 mM) | 1.06 ± 0.04 | — |
| +Glucose (10 mM) | 1.61 ± 0.08d | 9.47 ± 0.16 |
| +Antimycin A (10 | 1.19 ± 0.04c | — |
| -Cells | N.D. | — |
| Doxorubicin (1 mM) | 4.54 ± 0.40c | — |
| Daunorubicin (400 | 1.39 ± 0.06c | — |
| 5-Iminodaunorubicin (400 | 0.64 ± 0.06 | — |
aMean ± S.E. of 3 to 15 experiments; bN.D. is not detectable; csignificantly different from control, at P < 0.01; dsignificantly different from samples containing doxorubicin alone, at P < 0.01.
Figure 2Effect of tumor cell number on the rate of cyanide-resistant oxygen consumption in the presence and absence of doxorubicin. The doxorubicin concentration used for these experiments was 400 μM. These studies were performed as described in Table 8; the data represent the mean ± S.E. of 3 determinations at each tumor cell concentration.
Requirements for doxorubicin-stimulated hydroxyl radical formation by detergent-treated Ehrlich carcinoma cells. Hydroxyl radical production by Ehrlich carcinoma cells was determined by measurements of formaldehyde production from DMSO; the standard reaction mixture contained 100 mM DMSO, 100 μM EDTA, 50 μM FeS04, 1 mM NADPH, 0.1% Triton X-100, 107 tumor cells/ml, and the indicated concentration of doxorubicin in a final volume of 7 ml of PBS at pH 7.2. Data are expressed as the mean ± S.E. of formaldehyde production for the 2 hr reaction interval in each experimental group; the total number of experiments for each group (n) is given in parentheses.
| Experimental system | Hydroxyl radical production (nmol formaldehyde/107 cells) |
|---|---|
| Control | 0.0 ± 0.0 ( |
| Doxorubicin (250 | 71.4 ± 10.4 ( |
| Minus cells | 0.0 ± 0.0 ( |
| Heat denatured cellsd | 0.0 ± 0.0 ( |
| Minus DMSO | 0.0 ± 0.0 ( |
| Minus EDTA | 0.0 ± 0.0 ( |
| Minus FeS04 | 0.0 ± 0.0 ( |
| Using 1 | 13.2 ± 4.6 ( |
| Using FeC13 (50 | 30.9 ± 10.0 ( |
| Minus NADPH | 0.0 ± 0.0 ( |
| Minus NADPH plus NADH (1 mM) | 30.6 ± 8.3 ( |
| Minus NADPH plus succinate (5 mM) | 0.0 ± 0.0 ( |
| Minus Triton X-100 | 0.0 ± 0.0 ( |
aMean ± S.E.; bsignificantly different from the control group (P < 0.001); csignificantly different from complete reaction mixture containing doxorubicin and 50 μM FeS04 (P < 0.001); dtumor cells autoclaved for 60 min; esignificantly different from control and from complete reaction mixture containing NADPH (P < 0.01).
Figure 3Effect of Ehrlich tumor cell number on doxorubicin-stimulated formaldehyde production. (a) Formaldehyde production from DMSO was assessed spectrophotometrically in the presence of a fixed concentration of doxorubicin (250 μM) over a 60 min period of incubation; the data represent the mean ± S.E. of three experiments for each concentration of tumor cells. (b) Effect of the duration of incubation on doxorubicin-induced formaldehyde formation by Ehrlich tumor cells. The extent of formaldehyde production by Ehrlich cells (107/ml) in the presence of doxorubicin (250 μM) was determined as a function of the time after initiation of the reaction. Each time point represents the mean ± S.E. of three experiments. (c) Effect of doxorubicin concentration on formaldehyde production by Ehrlich tumor cells. In these studies, the production of formaldehyde from DMSO was examined at a tumor cell concentration of 107/ml; the data represent the mean ± S.E. of three experiments at each doxorubicin level tested.
Effect of oxygen radical scavengers on doxorubicin-enhanced formaldehyde production by detergent-treated Ehrlich tumor cells. Hydroxyl radical production by Ehrlich carcinoma cells was determined exactly as described in Table 9; data have been expressed as the mean ± S.E. of formaldehyde production for the 2 hr reaction interval in each experimental group, and the total number of experiments (n) has been given in parentheses.
| Experimental conditions | Formaldehyde production (nmol/107 cells) |
|---|---|
| Doxorubicin (250 | 60.4 ± 5.6 (6)a |
| Plus SOD (20 | 17.0 ± 9.6 (6)b |
| Plus heat-denatured SOD (20 | 49.1 ± 5.0 (3) |
| Plus catalase (3000 units/ml) | 0.0 ± 0.0 (3)d |
| Plus heat-denatured catalase (3000 units/ml) | 44.3 ± 7.5 (3) |
| Plus sodium benzoate (100 mM) | 34.3 ± 3.4 (3)b |
| Plus mannitol | |
| 100 mM | 41.7 ± 3.5 (3)b |
| 200 mM | 23.6 ± 3.5 (3)d |
| Plus diethylurea (100 mM) | 25.8 ± 6.0 (3)b |
| Plus dimethylthiourea (100 mM) | 0.0 ± 0.0 (3)d |
| Plus urea (100 mM) | 50.9 ± 9.6 (3) |
aMean ± S.E.; bsignificantly different from samples treated with doxorubicin alone (P < 0.01); cSOD and catalase were autoclaved for 60 min; dsignificantly different from samples treated with doxorubicin alone (P < 0.001).