| Literature DB >> 31885642 |
Gabriela Morales-Velazquez1,2, Blanca Patricia Lazalde-Ramos3, Belinda Claudia Gómez-Meda4, Guillermo Moisés Zúñiga-González5, Yveth Marlene Ortiz-García1, Rosalinda Gutiérrez-Hernández6, Celia Guerrero-Velazquez1, Susana Vanessa Sánchez de la Rosa1, Ana Lourdes Zamora-Perez1.
Abstract
Jatropha dioica is traditionally used owing to its antiviral, antifungal, and antimicrobial properties. But, toxicological information regarding J. dioica root total extract is currently limited. The aim of this work was to evaluate in a rat model, the transplacental genotoxicity effect of J. dioica aqueous root total extract. Three different J. dioica aqueous root total extract doses (60, 100, and 300 mg/kg) were administered orally to Wistar rats during 5 days through the pregnancy term (16-21 days). Pregnant rats were sampled every 24 h during the last 6 days of gestation, and pubs were sampled at birth. Genome damage in dams and their newborn pups transplacentally exposed to J. dioica was evaluated by in vivo micronuclei assay. We evaluated the frequency of micronucleated erythrocytes (MNE), micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MNPCE), and polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) in peripheral blood samples from pups and MNPCE and PCE in pregnant rats. No genotoxic effect was observed after oral administration of the three different doses of aqueous root total extract of J. dioica in pregnant or in their newborn pubs, after transplacental exposure. A significant decrease in PCE frequency was noted in samples from pubs of rats treated with the highest dose of J. dioica extract. The aqueous total root extract of J. dioica at the highest dose tested in our research do have cytotoxic effect in pups transplacentally exposed to this plant extract. Moreover, neither a genotoxic nor a cytotoxic effect was observed in pregnant rats. In the present work, there was no evidence of genome damage in the rat model after transplacental exposure to J. dioica aqueous root total extract.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31885642 PMCID: PMC6925703 DOI: 10.1155/2019/2962950
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Schematic representation of transplacental MN assay.
Figure 2MNE (a), MNPCE (b), and PCE (c) from rat peripheral blood. Oil immersion objective 1000×, acridine orange stain.
MNPCE and PCE values from the pregnant rat study group at different sampling times.
| Sampling time (h) | Negative control ( |
|
|
| Positive control ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNPCE | PCE | MNPCE | PCE | MNPCE | PCE | MNPCE | PCE | MNPCE | PCE | |
| 0 | 0.22 ± 0.26 | 40.83 ± 11.60 | 0.33 ± 0.33 | 54.00 ± 12.51 | 0.38 ± 0.38 | 55.83 ± 16.11 | 0.13 ± 0.18 | 47.60 ± 7.50 | 0.66 ± 0.21 | 38.17 ± 8.86 |
| NSb | NSb | NSb | NSb | NSb | NSb |
| NSb | |||
|
| ||||||||||
| 24 | 0.27 ± 0.32 | 36.67 ± 4.08 | 0.73 ± 0.54 | 46.80 ± 4.26 | 0.33 ± 0.36 | 51.83 ± 10.18 | 0.13 ± 0.18 | 45.60 ± 7.70 | 0.55 ± 0.54 | 38.17 ± 3.12 |
| NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | |
| NSb | NSb | NSb |
| NSb | NSb | NSb | NSb | |||
|
| ||||||||||
| 48 | 0.33 ± 0.36 | 36.67 ± 8.35 | 0.46 ± 0.29 | 47.60 ± 8.26 | 0.60 ± 0.57 | 50.17 ± 6.55 | 0.33 ± 0.33 | 38.20 ± 6.38 | 0.55 ± 0.34 | 40.00 ± 11.67 |
| NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | |
| NSb | NSb | NSb |
| NSb | NSb | NSb | NSb | |||
|
| ||||||||||
| 72 | 0.61 ± 0.57 | 38.33 ± 7.60 | 0.53 ± 0.50 | 44.20 ± 8.58 | 0.60 ± 0.25 | 47.17 ± 8.84 | 0.39 ± 0.36 | 41.60 ± 11.92 | 0.55 ± 0.27 | 34.50 ± 9.39 |
| NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | |
| NSb | NSb | NSb | NSb | NSb | NSb | NSb | NSb | |||
|
| ||||||||||
| 96 | 0.33 ± 0.51 | 41.67 ± 10.94 | 0.46 ± 0.37 | 48.8 ± 9.03 | 0.38 ± 0.44 | 41.17 ± 4.21 | 0.91 ± 0.95 | 38.20 ± 12.21 | 0.60 ± 0.49 | 18.33 ± 5.68 |
| NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa |
| |
| NSb | NSb | NSb | NSb | NSb | NSb | NSb |
| |||
|
| ||||||||||
| 120 | 0.66 ± 0.76 | 39.17 ± 15.72 | 0.52 ± 0.18 | 43.20 ± 12.55 | 0.55 ± 0.45 | 47.50 ± 10.78 | 0.73 ± 0.63 | 34.60 ± 7.02 | 0.33 ± 0.29 | 5.83 ± 1.47 |
| NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa | NSa |
| |
| NSb | NSb | NSb | NSb | NSb | NSb | NSb |
| |||
Data (‰) are expressed as mean ± standard deviation per group. MNPCE: micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes/1000 PCE; PCE: polychromatic erythrocytes/1000 TE; TE: total erythrocytes; n: sample size, pregnant rats per group; NS: not significant; J. dioica: Jatropha dioica.;aintragroup significance (repeated measures ANOVA and Bonferroni test post hoc for multiple comparisons);bintergroup significance (one-way ANOVA and Dunnett t-test post hoc for multiple comparisons).
Figure 3Proportion of MNPCE and PCE in pregnant rat peripheral blood in the study groups. Mean values are expressed as columns, and error bars represent standard deviation. Intragroup comparisons were performed between baseline samples (0 h against the following sampling times: 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h. No statistically significant increases were observed in MNPCE and PCE numbers at any sampling time. PCE: polychromatic erythrocytes; MNPCE: micronucleus polychromatic erythrocytes; total erythrocytes.
MNE, MNPCE, and PCE frequencies from pups of the pregnant rat study group.
| Groups |
| MNE | MNPCE | PCE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative control | 6 | 1.83 ± 0.52 | 3.67 ± 1.58 | 653.83 ± 116.69 |
|
| ||||
|
| 6 | 1.35 ± 0.55 | 3.60 ± 1.52 | 608.30 ± 88.23 |
| NS | NS | NS | ||
|
| ||||
|
| 6 | 1.66 ± 0.59 | 4.28 ± 2.65 | 609.47 ± 157.84 |
| NS | NS | NS | ||
|
| ||||
|
| 6 | 1.70 ± 0.46 | 3.73 ± 2.47 | 521.45 ± 122.76 |
| NS | NS |
| ||
|
| ||||
| Positive control: CP (60 mg/kg) | 6 | 11.27 ± 4.21 | 27.60 ± 10.64 | 532.47 ± 115.20 |
|
|
|
| ||
Data (‰) are expressed as mean ± standard deviation per group. J. dioica aqueous extract was administered orally to pregnant rats. MNE: micronucleated erythrocytes/1,000 TE; TE: total erythrocytes; MNPCE: micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes/1,000 PCE; PCE: polychromatic erythrocytes/1,000 TE; n: sample size (pregnant rats/6 pups per dam); NS: not significant. Intergroup analysis by means of one-way ANOVA and Dunnet's t-test posthoc for multiple comparisons.
Figure 4Proportion of PCE, MNE, and MNPCE from pups of the pregnant rat in the study group. Mean values are expressed as columns, and error bars represent standard deviation. Intergroup analysis by means of one-way ANOVA and Dunnet t-test posthoc for multiple comparisons. PCE: polychromatic erythrocytes; MNE: micronucleus erythrocytes; MNPCE: micronucleus polychromatic erythrocytes; total erythrocytes. P < 0.001.
Weight and number of offsprings in new born rats from mothers treated with J. dioica during pregnancy.
| Study groups | Weight (g) | Number of offsprings |
|---|---|---|
| Negative control ( | 5.76 ± 0.48 | 6.43 ± 2.99 |
|
| ||
|
| 6.0 ± 0.30 | 6.17 ± 2.63 |
| NS | ||
|
| ||
|
| 6.33 ± 0.47 | 5.43 ± 2.50 |
| NS | ||
|
| ||
|
| 5.56 ± 0.50 | 7.50 ± 4.32 |
| NS | ||
|
| ||
| Positive control | 4.85 ± 0.48 | 8.0 ± 2.82 |
|
| ||
Data are expressed as mean ± SD; NS: not significant; n: sample size (pregnant rats/6 pups per dam). All study groups were compared with the negative control.