| Literature DB >> 34869181 |
Yanan Li1,2, Yanyan Fang1,3, Zehua Liu1,3, Yahan Zhang1,3, Kangli Liu1, Luping Jiang1,2, Boyuan Yang1,3, Yongdie Yang3, Yongwei Song3, Chaoyang Liu1,3,4.
Abstract
Lead (Pb) in lipstick products has become an increasing concern, which can cause safety problems to human body directly with diet. To investigate the Pb exposure and potential health risk level of typical popular lip cosmetics in Chinese e-commerce market, Python crawler was introduced to identify and select 34 typical popular lip cosmetics, including 12 lipsticks, 13 lip glosses, and 9 lip balms. And then this study used ICP-MS to determine the content of Pb. Furthermore, the ingestion health risk assessment method issued by United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and Monte Carlo simulation algorithm were applied to assess the probabilistic health risks of adults exposure. Finally, taking the possible exposure of children contacting with lip products, the health risk assessment of children blood Pb was carried out. The results showed that the concentration of Pb in lip products ranged from 0 to 0.5237 mg/kg, which was far lower than the limit set by various countries. The probabilistic non-carcinogenic risks and carcinogenic risks were 4.93 ×10-7~2.82 ×10-3 and 1.68 ×10-12~9.59 ×10-9, respectively, which were in an acceptable level. The results of blood Pb assessment suggested that the Pb content of lip cosmetics had no obvious influence on blood Pb concentration of children, and background Pb exposure is the main factor affecting children's blood Pb level (BLL). Overall, the samples of lip products are selected by Python crawler in this study, which are more objective and representative. This study focuses on deeper study of Pb, especially for the health risk assessment of blood Pb in children exposed to lip products. These results perhaps could provide useful information for the safety cosmetics usage for people in China and even the global world.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese e-commerce market; Monte Carlo; Pb; Python crawler; health risk; lip cosmetics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34869181 PMCID: PMC8637816 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.766984
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1The crawling process by Python.
Figure 2The boxplot of price distribution.
The basic information for all samples (N = 34).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lipsticks | LS1 | Chanel | France | Orange red | 320 |
| ( | LS2 | YSL | France | True red | 320 |
| LS3 | Armani | France | True red | 320 | |
| LS4 | Dior | France | True red | 330 | |
| LS5 | Dhc | Japan | Orange | 158 | |
| LS6 | Mac | Canada | Brick red | 185 | |
| LS7 | L′ Oreal | China | Orange red | 135 | |
| LS8 | Maybelline | China | Orange red | 120 | |
| LS9 | Carslan | China | Cameo brown | 139 | |
| LS10 | Revlon | America | Orange red | 78 | |
| LS11 | Kiko | Italy | Cameo brown | 90 | |
| LS12 | Zeesea | China | Brick red | 70 | |
| Lip glosses | LG1 | YSL | France | Cameo brown | 320 |
| ( | LG2 | Armani | France | Orange red | 310 |
| LG3 | Chanel | France | Purplish red | 330 | |
| LG4 | Dior | France | True red | 330 | |
| LG5 | Mac | Canada | Pink | 170 | |
| LG6 | Maybelline | China | True red | 122 | |
| LG7 | L′ Oreal | China | Cameo brown | 145 | |
| LG8 | Carslan | China | Orange red | 109 | |
| LG9 | Revlon | America | Cameo brown | 48 | |
| LG10 | Chioture | China | Cameo brown | 60 | |
| LG11 | Zeesea | China | Brick red | 80 | |
| LG12 | Kiko | Italy | Pink | 90 | |
| LG13 | Kiko | Italy | Colorless | 90 | |
| Lip balms | LB1 | Dhc | Japan | Colorless | 78 |
| ( | LB2 | Uriage | France | Colorless | 78 |
| LB3 | Maybelline | China | Light red | 30 | |
| LB4 | Mentholatum | China | Colorless | 35 | |
| LB5 | Vaseline | America | Colorless | 25 | |
| LB6 | Vaseline | America | Light red | 25 | |
| LB7 | Herbacin | Germany | Colorless | 45 | |
| LB8 | Mentholatum | China | Light red | 36 | |
| LB9 | Burt's bees | America | Colorless | 70 |
Parameter selection and references of health risk assessment model for oral ingestion.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Intake rate of average users IR(g/d) | 0.02578 | ( |
| Intake rate of high users IR(g/d) | 0.14902 | ( |
| Exposed frequency EF(d/a) | 365 | ( |
| Exposure duration ED(a) | 70 | ( |
| Turnover rate CF | 0.001 | ( |
| Average exposure time AT(d) | 25550 | ( |
| Body weight BW(kg) | 60 | ( |
| Non-carcinogenic reference dose RfD (mg/(kg·d)) | 0.0004 | ( |
| Cancer slope factors SF ((kg·d)/mg) | 0.0085 | ( |
Figure 3The contents of Pb in typical popular lip cosmetics (N = 34).
The contents of Pb in various lip products (mg/kg).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average value | 0.05482 | 0.04976 | 0.07380 | 0.05791 |
| Standard deviation | 0.04506 | 0.07922 | 0.16358 | 0.10146 |
| Maximum value | 0.13849 | 0.23093 | 0.52470 | 0.52370 |
| Minimum value | 0.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.00000 |
Figure 4The non-cancer health risk assessment of Pb.
Figure 5The cancer health risk assessment of Pb.
The running results for adult blood Pb model.
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Background | 1.62 | 2.03 | ||||||
| Lip cosmetic | 0.0006 | 0.0035 | 0.0006 | 0.0035 | ||||
| PBL | 1.6206 | 1.6235 | 2.0306 | 2.0335 | ||||
| From mother to fetus | 1.3775 | 1.4585 | 1.3799 | 1.4611 | 1.7260 | 1.8275 | 1.7284 | 1.8301 |
The running results for the IEUBK model.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 0.5~1 | 9.694 ± 0.002 | 5.2 |
| 1~2 | 13.224 ± 0.002 | 5.9 |
| 2~3 | 13.574 ± 0.002 | 5.1 |
| 3~4 | 18.684 ± 0.001 | 6.0 |
| 4~5 | 16.679 ± 0.002 | 5.7 |
| 5~6 | 16.294 ± 0.002 | 5.1 |
| 6~7 | 16.048 ± 0.002 | 4.6 |