| Literature DB >> 31884571 |
Yusuf Ransome1, Karlene Cunningham2, Miguel Paredes3, Leandro Mena4, Cassandra Sutten-Coats5,6, Philip Chan7,8, Dantrell Simmons9, Tiara C Willie8, Amy Nunn5,6.
Abstract
Concurrent sexual partnerships (i.e., relationships that overlap in time) contribute to higher HIV acquisition risk. Social capital, defined as resources and connections available to individuals is hypothesized to reduce sexual HIV risk behavior, including sexual concurrency. Additionally, we do not know whether any association between social capital and sexual concurrency is moderated by gender. Multivariable logistic regression tested the association between social capital and sexual concurrency and effect modification by gender. Among 1445 African Americans presenting for care at an urban STI clinic in Jackson, Mississippi, mean social capital was 2.85 (range 1-5), mean age was 25 (SD = 6), and 62% were women. Sexual concurrency in the current year was lower for women compared to men (45% vs. 55%, χ2(df = 1) = 11.07, p = .001). Higher social capital was associated with lower adjusted odds of sexual concurrency for women compared to men (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] = 0.62 (95% CI 0.39-0.97), p = 0.034), controlling for sociodemographic and psychosocial covariates. Interventions that add social capital components may be important for lowering sexual risk among African Americans in Mississippi.Entities:
Keywords: African american; HIV; Mississippi; Social capital; South
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31884571 PMCID: PMC7314723 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-019-02770-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIDS Behav ISSN: 1090-7165
Descriptive characteristics of the study sample
| N = 1445 | Mean (SD) or N (%) |
|---|---|
| Social capital (range 1 low to 5 high) | 2.84 (0.82) |
| Gender | |
| Men | 555 (38.51) |
| Women | 886 (61.49) |
| Age (continuous) | 24.70 (6.14) |
| Sexual orientation | |
| Heterosexual (ref) | 1,282 (89.59) |
| Lesbian | 28 (1.96) |
| Gay | 42 (2.94) |
| Bisexual | 79 (5.52) |
| Marital status | |
| Single (ref) | 1,261 (87.33) |
| Married/common-law | 112 (7.76) |
| Divorced/other | 71 (4.92) |
| Degree | |
| High school or less | 605 (41.96) |
| Some college | 637 (44.17) |
| College graduate and higher | 200 (13.87) |
| Income | |
| < $500 | 446 (31.45) |
| $501–$1500 | 525 (37.02) |
| $1501–$3000 | 276 (19.46) |
| > $3000 | 171 (12.06) |
| Employment | |
| Full time or part-time | 764 (53.24) |
| Unemployed looking for work | 530 (36.93) |
| Unemployed not looking for work | 141 (9.83) |
| On public assistance | |
| No (ref) | 593 (41.30) |
| Yes | 843 (58.70) |
| Excessive alcohol use (AUDIT-C) * ≥ 4 for Men and ≥ 3 Women | |
| No (ref) | 747 (51.8) |
| Yes | 694 (48.2) |
| Self-reported depression | |
| No (ref) | 905 (65.25) |
| Yes | 482 (34.75) |
| Self-reported HIV risk | |
| Not at risk (ref) | 709 (51.23) |
| Low | 472 (34.10) |
| Moderate | 155 (11.20) |
| High | 48 (03.47) |
| Sexual concurrency (past year), men | 236 (52.10) |
| Sexual concurrency (past year), women | 336 (42.87) |
| Sexual concurrency (current year), men | 249 (54.97) |
| Sexual concurrency (current year), women | 354 (45.15) |
Multivariable association between social capital, gender, and sexual concurrency in the current year
| Sexual concurrency, current year (aN = 1186) | Model 1 | Model 2 |
|---|---|---|
| aOR (95%CI) | aOR (95%CI) | |
| Social capital | 1.27 (0.89, 1.81)ns | 1.24 (0.86, 1.78)ns |
| Gender (women) | 0.52 (0.39, 0.69)*** | 0.52 (0.39, 0.70)*** |
| Gender * social capital (men) | 1.66 (1.06, 2.59)* | 1.62 (1.03, 2.53)* |
| Gender * social capital (women) | 0.60 (0.38, 0.93)* | 0.62 (0.39, 0.97)* |
| b(Model 1, | b(Model 1, |
Model 1 adjusts for age, sexual orientation, marital status, education, income, employment, and on public assistance
Model 2 adjusts for Model 1 + self-reported depression, and a two-way interaction term between self-reported HIV risk and excessive alcohol use using the AUDIT-C binary variable tailored for sex-specific scores
ns not significant
aMultivariable model sample size
bTest for interaction between gender*social capital on the marginal scale that accounts for baseline differences in odds ratios
*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001; p < .10
Fig. 1The graphical association showing that the risk of having a concurrent sexual partner in the past year is higher for men compared to women as social capital levels increase
Multivariable association between social capital, gender, and sexual concurrency in the past year
| Sexual concurrency, past year Na (1186) | Model 1 | Model 2 |
|---|---|---|
| aOR (95%CI) | aOR (95%CI) | |
| Social capital | 1.39 (0.97, 1.99)+ | 1.37 (0.95, 1.97)+ |
| Gender (women) | 0.53 (0.39, 0.70)*** | 0.52 (0.39, 0.70)*** |
| Gender* Social Capital (men) | 1.84 (1.17, 2.87)** | 1.82 (1.16, 2.87)** |
| Gender * Social Capital (women) | 0.54 (0.35, 0.85)** | 0.55 (0.35, 0.86)** |
| b(Model 1, | b(Model 1, |
Model 1 adjusts for age, sexual orientation, marital status, education, income, employment, and on public assistance
Model 2 adjusts for Model 1 + self-reported depression, and a two-way interaction term between self-reported HIV risk and excessive alcohol use using the AUDIT-C binary variable tailored for sex-specific scores
ns not significant
aMultivariable model sample size
bTest for interaction between gender*social capital on the marginal scale that accounts for baseline differences in odds ratios
*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001; + p < .10