BACKGROUND: African American women are disproportionately affected by HIV/AIDS. Concurrent sexual partnerships may contribute to racial disparities in HIV infection. Little is known about attitudes and practices related to concurrency among African American women, or the social, structural and behavioural factors influencing concurrency. METHODS: We recruited 19 heterosexual African American women engaging in concurrent sexual partnerships from a public clinic in Philadelphia in 2009. We conducted interviews exploring social norms, attitudes and practices about concurrency, and the structural, social and behavioural factors influencing concurrent sexual partnerships, guided by grounded theory. RESULTS: Seventeen women reported one main and one or more non-main partners; two reported no main partners. Many women used condoms more frequently with non-main than main partners, noting they trust main partners more than non-main partners. Social factors included social normalisation of concurrency, inability to negotiate partners' concurrent partnerships, being unmarried, and not trusting partners. Lack of trust was the most commonly cited reason that women engaged in concurrent partnerships. Structural factors included economic dependence on partners, partners' dependence on women for economic support and incarceration that interrupted partnerships. Behavioural factors included alcohol and cocaine use. CONCLUSIONS: Social, structural and behavioural factors strongly influenced these African American women's concurrent sexual partnerships. Many HIV interventions disseminated by the CDC focus largely on behavioural factors and may fail to address the social and structural factors influencing African American women's sexual networks. Novel HIV prevention interventions that address the social determinants of African American women's HIV risks are urgently needed.
BACKGROUND: African American women are disproportionately affected by HIV/AIDS. Concurrent sexual partnerships may contribute to racial disparities in HIV infection. Little is known about attitudes and practices related to concurrency among African American women, or the social, structural and behavioural factors influencing concurrency. METHODS: We recruited 19 heterosexual African American women engaging in concurrent sexual partnerships from a public clinic in Philadelphia in 2009. We conducted interviews exploring social norms, attitudes and practices about concurrency, and the structural, social and behavioural factors influencing concurrent sexual partnerships, guided by grounded theory. RESULTS: Seventeen women reported one main and one or more non-main partners; two reported no main partners. Many women used condoms more frequently with non-main than main partners, noting they trust main partners more than non-main partners. Social factors included social normalisation of concurrency, inability to negotiate partners' concurrent partnerships, being unmarried, and not trusting partners. Lack of trust was the most commonly cited reason that women engaged in concurrent partnerships. Structural factors included economic dependence on partners, partners' dependence on women for economic support and incarceration that interrupted partnerships. Behavioural factors included alcohol and cocaine use. CONCLUSIONS: Social, structural and behavioural factors strongly influenced these African American women's concurrent sexual partnerships. Many HIV interventions disseminated by the CDC focus largely on behavioural factors and may fail to address the social and structural factors influencing African American women's sexual networks. Novel HIV prevention interventions that address the social determinants of African American women's HIV risks are urgently needed.
Authors: Adaora A Adimora; Victor J Schoenbach; Dana M Bonas; Francis E A Martinson; Kathryn H Donaldson; Tonya R Stancil Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Pamina M Gorbach; Bradley P Stoner; Sevgi O Aral; Willian L H Whittington; King K Holmes Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Adaora A Adimora; Victor J Schoenbach; Francis E A Martinson; Kathryn H Donaldson; Tonya R Stancil; Robert E Fullilove Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2003-12-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Adaora A Adimora; Victor J Schoenbach; Francis Martinson; Kathryn H Donaldson; Tonya R Stancil; Robert E Fullilove Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Hannah L F Cooper; Sabriya Linton; Danielle F Haley; Mary E Kelley; Emily F Dauria; Conny Chen Karnes; Zev Ross; Josalin Hunter-Jones; Kristen K Renneker; Carlos Del Rio; Adaora Adimora; Gina Wingood; Richard Rothenberg; Loida E Bonney Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2015-06
Authors: J Justman; M Befus; J Hughes; J Wang; C E Golin; A A Adimora; I Kuo; D F Haley; C Del Rio; W M El-Sadr; A Rompalo; S Mannheimer; L Soto-Torres; S Hodder Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2015-07
Authors: Sabriya L Linton; Hannah L F Cooper; Mary E Kelley; Conny C Karnes; Zev Ross; Mary E Wolfe; Don Des Jarlais; Salaam Semaan; Barbara Tempalski; Elizabeth DiNenno; Teresa Finlayson; Catlainn Sionean; Cyprian Wejnert; Gabriela Paz-Bailey Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Joan R Cates; Diane B Francis; Catalina Ramirez; Jane D Brown; Victor J Schoenbach; Thierry Fortune; Wizdom Powell Hammond; Adaora A Adimora Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2015-07-02
Authors: Pamela S Lilleston; Luciana E Hebert; Jacky M Jennings; David R Holtgrave; Jonathan M Ellen; Susan G Sherman Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2015-12
Authors: Amy Nunn; Sarah MacCarthy; Nancy Barnett; Jennifer Rose; Philip Chan; Annajane Yolken; Alexandra Cornwall; Nicholas Chamberlain; Arti Barnes; Reginald Riggins; Elya Moore; Dantrell Simmons; Sharon Parker; Leandro Mena Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2014-12
Authors: Ralph J DiClemente; Teaniese L Davis; Andrea Swartzendruber; Amy M Fasula; Lorin Boyce; Deborah Gelaude; Simone C Gray; James Hardin; Eve Rose; Monique Carry; Jessica M Sales; Jennifer L Brown; Michelle Staples-Horne Journal: Women Health Date: 2014