Hua-Hie Yong1, Chandan Karmakar2, Ron Borland3, Shitanshu Kusmakar2, Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz4, John Yearwood2. 1. School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. Electronic address: hua.yong@deakin.edu.au. 2. School of Information Technology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. 3. School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 4. School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Regression-based research has successfully identified independent predictors of smoking cessation, both its initiation and maintenance. However, it is unclear how these various independent predictors interact with each other and conjointly influence smoking behaviour. As a proof-of-concept, this study used decision tree analysis (DTA) to identify the characteristics of smoker subgroups with high versus low smoking cessation initiation probability based on the conjoint effects of four predictor variables, and determine any variations by socio-economic status (SES). METHODS: Data come from the Australian arm of the ITC project, a longitudinal cohort study of adult smokers followed up approximately annually. Reported wanting to quit smoking, worries about smoking negative health impact, quitting self-efficacy and quit intentions assessed in 2005 were used as predictors and reported quit attempts at the 2006 follow-up survey were used as the outcome for the initial model calibration and validation analyses (n = 1475), and further cross-validated using the 2012-2013 data (n = 787). RESULTS: DTA revealed that while all four predictor variables conjointly contributed to the identification of subgroups with high versus low smoking cessation initiation probability, quit intention was the most important predictor common across all SES strata. The relative importance of the other predictors showed differences by SES. CONCLUSIONS: Modifiable characteristics of smoker subgroups associated with making a quit attempt and any variations by SES can be successfully identified using a decision tree analysis approach, to provide insights as to who might benefit from targeted intervention, thus, underscoring the value of this approach to complement the conventional regression-based approach.
BACKGROUND: Regression-based research has successfully identified independent predictors of smoking cessation, both its initiation and maintenance. However, it is unclear how these various independent predictors interact with each other and conjointly influence smoking behaviour. As a proof-of-concept, this study used decision tree analysis (DTA) to identify the characteristics of smoker subgroups with high versus low smoking cessation initiation probability based on the conjoint effects of four predictor variables, and determine any variations by socio-economic status (SES). METHODS: Data come from the Australian arm of the ITC project, a longitudinal cohort study of adult smokers followed up approximately annually. Reported wanting to quit smoking, worries about smoking negative health impact, quitting self-efficacy and quit intentions assessed in 2005 were used as predictors and reported quit attempts at the 2006 follow-up survey were used as the outcome for the initial model calibration and validation analyses (n = 1475), and further cross-validated using the 2012-2013 data (n = 787). RESULTS: DTA revealed that while all four predictor variables conjointly contributed to the identification of subgroups with high versus low smoking cessation initiation probability, quit intention was the most important predictor common across all SES strata. The relative importance of the other predictors showed differences by SES. CONCLUSIONS: Modifiable characteristics of smoker subgroups associated with making a quit attempt and any variations by SES can be successfully identified using a decision tree analysis approach, to provide insights as to who might benefit from targeted intervention, thus, underscoring the value of this approach to complement the conventional regression-based approach.
Authors: Lin Li; Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong; Geoffrey T Fong; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Anne C K Quah; Buppha Sirirassamee; Maizurah Omar; Mark P Zanna; Omid Fotuhi Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong; James Balmford; Jae Cooper; K Michael Cummings; Richard J O'Connor; Ann McNeill; Mark P Zanna; Geoffrey T Fong Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Hua-Hie Yong; Mohammad Siahpush; Ron Borland; Lin Li; Richard J O'Connor; Jilan Yang; Geoffrey T Fong; Jiang Yuan Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2012-11-02 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Hua-Hie Yong; Ron Borland; James F Thrasher; Mary E Thompson; Gera E Nagelhout; Geoffrey T Fong; David Hammond; K Michael Cummings Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2014-06-30 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Hua-Hie Yong; Sara C Hitchman; K Michael Cummings; Ron Borland; Shannon M L Gravely; Ann McNeill; Geoffrey T Fong Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Michael Le Grande; Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong; Ann McNeill; Geoffrey Fong; K Michael Cummings Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2022-03-26 Impact factor: 5.825