Literature DB >> 31883275

Blood loss from laboratory testing, anemia, and red blood cell transfusion in the intensive care unit: a retrospective study.

Nicholas L Jackson Chornenki1, Tyler E James1, Rebecca Barty1,2, Yang Liu1,2, Bram Rochwerg1,3, Nancy M Heddle1,2, Deborah M Siegal1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anemia is common in critically ill patients and associated with adverse outcomes. Phlebotomy associated with laboratory testing is a potentially modifiable contributor. This study aims to 1) characterize the blood volume taken for laboratory testing, and 2) explore the effect of blood loss on red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and anemia in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients.
METHODS: Using a transfusion research database, we retrospectively reviewed consecutively admitted patients to four medical-surgical ICUs in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. The primary outcome was estimated blood loss for laboratory testing during ICU admission. Secondary outcomes were hemoglobin (Hb) of 90 g/L or less and RBC transfusion.
RESULTS: Among the 7273 patients included, the median blood volume per patient taken for laboratory testing during their ICU stay was 213 mL (interquartile range [IQR], 133-382 mL). On ICU admission, median Hb was 97 g/L (IQR, 82-116 g/L). An Hb of 90 g/L or less occurred in 67.0% of patients during their ICU stay. Median Hb on ICU discharge adjusted for RBC transfusion was 84 g/L (IQR, 58-105 g/L). RBC transfusion was administered to 47.5% of patients, who received a median of 3 units (IQR, 2-7 units). Cumulative blood loss due to laboratory testing from Day 2 to Day 7 of ICU admission was independently associated with RBC transfusion (hazard ratio, 2.28 for each 150-mL increment; 95% confidence interval, 2.02-2.59).
CONCLUSIONS: Blood loss for laboratory testing is substantial in ICU patients and significantly associated with RBC transfusion. Strategies to reduce blood loss from laboratory testing represents an area for further investigation.
© 2019 AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31883275     DOI: 10.1111/trf.15649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  6 in total

1.  Performance evaluation of the XT MicroSlide assay pairs on the Vitros XT 7600 compared to VITROS single microslide assays on Vitros 5600.

Authors:  Lily Olayinka; Estella Tam; Sridevi Devaraj
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2022-05-23

2.  A New Time-Window Prediction Model For Traumatic Hemorrhagic Shock Based on Interpretable Machine Learning.

Authors:  Yuzhuo Zhao; Lijing Jia; Ruiqi Jia; Hui Han; Cong Feng; Xueyan Li; Zijian Wei; Hongxin Wang; Heng Zhang; Shuxiao Pan; Jiaming Wang; Xin Guo; Zheyuan Yu; Xiucheng Li; Zhaohong Wang; Wei Chen; Jing Li; Tanshi Li
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Coagulation test understanding and ordering by medical trainees: Novel teaching approach.

Authors:  Nadia Gabarin; Martina Trinkaus; Rita Selby; Nicola Goldberg; Hina Hanif; Michelle Sholzberg
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2022-06-17

4.  Iatrogenic blood loss in critical care: A prospective observational study conducted at Universitas Academic Hospital in the Free State Province, South Africa.

Authors:  J C Adams; C Barrett; M Spruyt
Journal:  South Afr J Crit Care       Date:  2022-08-05

5.  Avoidable Blood Loss in Critical Care and Patient Blood Management: Scoping Review of Diagnostic Blood Loss.

Authors:  Philipp Helmer; Sebastian Hottenrott; Andreas Steinisch; Daniel Röder; Jörg Schubert; Udo Steigerwald; Suma Choorapoikayil; Patrick Meybohm
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 6.  Diagnostic Modalities in Critical Care: Point-of-Care Approach.

Authors:  Sasa Rajsic; Robert Breitkopf; Mirjam Bachler; Benedikt Treml
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.