Literature DB >> 31883002

Combined effects of dosage compensation and incomplete dominance on gene expression in triploid cyprinids.

Li Ren1,2, Xiaojing Yan1,2, Liu Cao1,2, Jiaming Li1,2, Xueyin Zhang1,2, Xin Gao1,2, Jia Liu1,2, Jialin Cui1,2, Shaojun Liu1,2.   

Abstract

Hybridization and polyploidy are pervasive evolutionary features of flowering plants and frequent among some animal groups, such as fish. These processes always lead to novel genotypes and various phenotypes, including growth heterosis. However, its genetic basis in lower vertebrate is still poorly understood. Here, we conducted transcriptome-level analyses of the allopolyploid complex of Carassius auratus red var. (R) (♀) × Cyprinus carpio L. (C) (♂), including the allodiploid and allotetraploid with symmetric subgenomes, and the two allotriploids with asymmetric subgenomes. The gradual changes of gene silencing and novel gene expression suggested the weakening of the constraint of polymorphic expression in genotypic changes. Then, analyses of the direction and magnitude of homoeolog expression exhibited various asymmetric expression patterns, which supported that R incomplete dominance and dosage compensation were co-regulated in the two triploids. Under these effects, various magnitudes of R-homoeolog expression bias were observed in growth-regulated genes, suggesting that they might contribute to growth heterosis in the two triploids. The determination of R incomplete dominance and dosage compensation, which might be led by asymmetric subgenomes and multiple sets of homologous chromosomes, explained why various expression patterns were shaped and their potential contribution to growth heterosis in the two triploids.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Kazusa DNA Research Institute.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allotriploid; asymmetric subgenomes; dosage compensation; homoeolog expression; incomplete dominance

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31883002      PMCID: PMC6993813          DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsz026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Res        ISSN: 1340-2838            Impact factor:   4.458


1. Introduction

Dosage compensation is when the expression of sex-linked genes originating from different biological sexes is equalized. Although most studies have focused on dosage compensation of sex chromosomes, the dosage compensation of sets of genes in subgenome or whole genomes has been detected in some allopolyploids including Oryza sativa L.,Arabidopsis,Squalius alburnoides, and the hybrid of Ctenopharyngodon idellus × Megalobrama amblycephala. The potential mechanisms of dosage compensation include chromatin remodelling and miRNAs. Dosage compensation is described as an important contributor to heterosis, or ‘hybrid vigour’ as it is commonly known, which is defined as the superior performance of hybrids compared with either of their parents., However, its genetic basis and molecular mechanism in lower vertebrates have remained obscure. Growth heterosis is an important trait in aquaculture species. The different amounts of heterosis were observed in the two allotriploids (3n = 150, RC2 and R2C), which were obtained from backcrossing of the allotetraploid (4n = 200) of Carassius auratus red var. (♀) × Cyprinus carpio L. (♂) with their two inbred parents, respectively., The allotriploid RC2 fish [intercrossing between diploid C. carpio L. (♀) and allotetraploid C. auratus red var. × C. carpio L. (♂)] showed highly significant growth heterosis comparing to the allotriploid R2C fish [intercrossing between C. auratus red var. (♀) and allotetraploid C. auratus red var. × C. carpio L. (♂)], suggesting the potential interaction between growth heterosis and genetic diversity, which affects various gene expression., Heterosis is related not only to changes in the global expression levels of all alleles, but also to interactions among multiple alleles originating from different species (also described as homoeologs)., Thus, focusing on both of these factors could help us investigate the causes and effects of gene expression changes in hybrids. After the merging of divergent genomes, the novel dominant–recessive relationship between alleles was rebuilt. Study on the quantitative traits under incomplete dominance was complex for multiple allele control. However, a few studies have described that some trait variation and heterosis are led by the incomplete dominance of deleterious alleles in maize. Both dosage effects and incomplete dominance could shape direction and magnitude of homoeolog expression, further contributing to various phenotypes in allopolyploid plant, including heterosis.,, In our study, we performed mRNA-seq on the two allotriploids with growth heterosis as described earlier. After a series of expression analysis, we obtained the homoeolog expression levels in liver and muscle tissues in allopolyploid complex of C. auratus red var. (♀) × C. carpio L. (♂). After genotype determination of the two triploids, comparative transcriptome analysis will help us understand the expression changes of one or two copies of genes originating from divergent genomes. In comparison of various growth features,, the homoeolog expression changes of growth-regulated genes were used to explore the genetic basis of growth heterosis in triploid fish.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Animals

A total of 6 types of fishes were used in our experiments: diploid C. auratus red var. (R); diploid C. carpio L. (C); first generation of allodiploid (F1) originating from outcrossing of C. auratus red var. (♀) and C. carpio L. (♂); eighteenth generation of allotetraploid of C. auratus red var. (♀) × C. carpio L. (♂) (F18); triploid fish (R2C) originating from intercrossing between female C. auratus red var. and male allotetraploid of C. auratus red var. (♀) × C. carpio L. (♂); and triploid fish (RC2) originating from intercrossing between female C. carpio L. (♀) and male allotetraploid of C. auratus red var. (♀) × C. carpio L. (♂). All fishes were fed in a pool with the same environment including suitable illumination, water temperature, dissolved oxygen content, and adequate forage. These experiments were conducted at the Engineering Center of Polyploidy Fish Breeding of the National Education Ministry, Hunan Normal University, Hunan, China, and conformed to the National Institutes of Health Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The animal work was approved by the academic committee in State Key Laboratory of Developmental Biology of Freshwater Fish (approval ID: 01/2018). Two-year-old male individuals of each genotype were collected with three biological replications. Fish were deeply anaesthetized with 100 mg/l MS-222 (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) before dissection. To exclude effects of different tissues on gene expression, all liver and muscle tissue samples were excised carefully to avoid contamination from the gut, and were used for total RNA extraction.

2.2. Genotype determination

To determine ploidy levels, a flow cytometer was used to measure the DNA content of erythrocytes from diploid and triploid individuals. Chromosomal preparations were made from peripheral blood cell cultures of 15-month-old fishes. Blood (0.2 ml) was collected using a syringe soaked with 0.1% sodium heparin, cultured in nutrient solution at 25.5°C and 5% CO2 for 68–72 h, and then colchicine was added 3.5 h before harvest. Cells were harvested by centrifugation, followed by hypotonic treatment with 0.075 M KCl at 26°C for 25–30 min, and then fixed in methanol–acetic acid (3:1, v/v) with three changes. The number of chromosomes was counted under a microscope. To determine the genotypes of the two triploid fish (R2C and RC2), a 9,468 bp-sized DNA repeat fragment of C. auratus red var. was used as a probe for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses. These analyses allowed us to characterize the chromosomes originating from C. auratus red var. The FISH probe was produced and labelled with digoxigenin-11-dUTP (ROCHE, Mannheim, Germany) of purified PCR products. A total of 150 metaphase chromosome spreads from 10 individuals were examined under an inverted microscope (CW4000, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) with a confocal imaging system (LCS SP2, Leica). Captured images were coloured and superimposed using Adobe Photoshop CS5 software.

2.3. mRNA-seq sequencing, alignments, and differential global expression analysis

The samples used to produce the mRNA-seq libraries were stored in RNALater (AM7021, Ambion Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. After DNase treatment, total RNA (∼2 μg) was used to construct mRNA-seq libraries according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For each type of fish, an mRNA-seq library was constructed with three biological replicates with paired ends (2 × 150 bp) using Illumina HiSeq × Ten (Illumina, Sad Diego, CA, USA). For the F1, F18, and their parents, we downloaded mRNA-seq data for liver tissue from the NCBI database (accession numbers: SRX668436, SRX175397, SRX668453, SRX177691, SRX671568, SRX671569, SRX668467, and SRX161099). The initial quality control of Illumina reads was performed with FastQC software, and adapters were trimmed using Trimmomatic software. The mRNA-seq reads of C. auratus red var. and C. carpio L. were mapped to genome sequences of C. auratus red var. (NCBI accession numbers: PRJNA487739 and PRJNA481500) and C. carpio L., respectively. Gene annotations were obtained by BLASTX searches of the NCBI, gene ontology, and Swiss-Prot databases. Because of the lack of a reference genome, mRNA-seq reads for F1 and F18, R2C, and RC2 were mapped to combined genome sequences of C. auratus red var. and C. carpio L. Read mapping was conducted using STAR software with default options. Read counts of C. auratus red var. and C. carpio L. for orthologous genes were summarized for each gene pair. Normalization, estimation of expression levels, and designation as differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were performed using the edgeR package in Bioconductor. The DEGs between the two genotypes were detected by edgeR using threshold of |log2 fold change| > 1% and 5% false discovery rate (FDR < 0.05) with three biological replicates.

2.4. Identification of species-specific single nucleotide polymorphisms in orthologs

Orthologous gene alignments between C. auratus red var. and C. carpio L. were obtained from all-against-all reciprocal BLASTP (v 2.2.26) comparisons with the parameters of ‘-e 10-5 –F –v 1 –m 8’ based on protein sequences. Unannotated transcripts and coding sequences shorter than 300 bp were discarded. In total, orthologous gene pairs were selected from the above best scoring match and filtering. To investigate the expression level of parent-of-origin genes (homoeolog expression), the LASTZ pairwise alignment tool (v 1.02.00) with default parameters was used to obtain the corresponding loci for orthologous gene pairs between C. auratus red var. and C. carpio L. The insertion–deletion polymorphisms loci were discarded, and only aligned loci with best scoring matches were used for further analyses. The single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were collected using SNP Calling pipeline with GATK (v 3.8) based on the results of parent transcriptome mapping to their respective genomes as described earlier. According to the comparison of SNPs and other loci in orthologous gene pairs between C. auratus red var. and C. carpio L., we identified heterozygous and homozygous loci with species-specific SNPs as used elsewhere., To remove the negative effects of sequencing and mapping, the screening of species-specific SNPs was checked for consistency in three biological replicates. Locus possessing read counts (≥1) were retained for all accessions and biological replicates in each comparison.

2.5. Detection of homoeolog expression levels in hybrids

To explore homoeolog expression in hybrids, the hybrid mapping results (bam files) of the transcriptome as described earlier were used in the following analyses. The mapping files for each hybrid were divided into two categories based on the two parental genomes. The R-/C-homoeolog reads in hybrids were calculated using in-house perl scripts, based on corresponding R-/C-species-specific SNPs in their corresponding mapping files. Gene expression levels in the parents were also determined based on the respective reference genome related to species-specific SNPs. To remove the negative effects of mutation sites in hybrids with different biological replicates, if the mapping reads of the species-specific SNP did not comply with the threshold of mean ± 2 S.D. in the three biological replicates, the abnormal value was discarded when estimating the R- and C-homoeolog expression level. Then, the sum counts of R- and C-homoeologs of each gene were normalized based on the ratio of the number of mapped reads for each gene to the total number of mapped reads for the entire genome. The sum of R-/C-homoeolog reads in all species-specific SNPs of each gene were used to assess the R-/C-homoeolog expression levels. The average deviation (AD) values of R- and C-homoeolog expression were used to assess the magnitude of deviation.

2.6. Homoeolog expression silencing and bias

After confirming orthologous gene pairs between C. auratus red var. and C. carpio L., we detected the extent of homoeolog silencing in liver and muscle tissues of the different types of fish. The following thresholds were set for this analysis: (i) read counts ≥5 in both two parents in three biological replications and (ii) R- or C-homoeologous reads in hybrid = 0 in three biological replications. To investigate the homoeolog expression bias (HEB) in hybrids, the value was set based on the formula . The distribution of Ebias was tested using the t-test in the ‘ggpubr’ package in R. We determined another value based on the parents’ expression levels , which was used as the reference for the beginning of changes in homoeolog expression. We calculated another two values for R2C and RC2, based on genotypes. Statistical analyses were performed to detect correlation coefficients between R- and C-homoeolog expression levels in the hybrids in those in their respective parents using Pearson’s test and Student’s t-test in GraphPad Prism (v 7.0) software.

3. Results

3.1. Determination of genotypes of two allotriploids

To determine whether dosage compensation occurred and shaped the various expression patterns in triploid fish, the genotypes of the two triploid fish (R2C and RC2) originating from the backcrossing of allotetraploid of C. auratus red var. (♀) × C. carpio L. (♂) were necessary to check (Fig. 1). A total of 150 chromosomes were detected by flow cytometry and microscopy in R2C and RC2. Two sets of C. auratus red var. (2n = 100) chromosomes and one set of C. carpio L. (n = 50) chromosomes were detected in R2C using FISH with a specific probe, while one set of C. auratus red var. (n = 50) chromosomes and two sets of C. carpio L. (2n = 100) chromosomes were detected in RC2 (Fig. 1). The results showed the two sets of homologous chromosomes in both of the two triploids. The symmetric subgenomes at the genomic level were detected in F1 and F18.,,
Figure 1

Genotypes of two cyprinids and their four types of hybrid offspring. R2C and RC2 derived from backcrossing of allotetraploid of C. auratus red var. (♀) × C. carpio L. (♂). One hundred signals were detected in R2C (100 chromosomes from C. auratus red var. and other 50 from C. carpio L.). Fifty signals were detected in RC2 (50 chromosomes from C. auratus red var. and other 100 from C. carpio L.). The specific-probe of C. auratus red var. was detected using FISH. Color figures are available at DNARES online.

Genotypes of two cyprinids and their four types of hybrid offspring. R2C and RC2 derived from backcrossing of allotetraploid of C. auratus red var. (♀) × C. carpio L. (♂). One hundred signals were detected in R2C (100 chromosomes from C. auratus red var. and other 50 from C. carpio L.). Fifty signals were detected in RC2 (50 chromosomes from C. auratus red var. and other 100 from C. carpio L.). The specific-probe of C. auratus red var. was detected using FISH. Color figures are available at DNARES online.

3.2. Changes of gene silencing and novel expression with genotypic changes

After initial adapter trimming and quality filtering of the mRNA-seq results, we obtained 29.6 Gb clean data for R2C, 32.6 Gb for RC2, 17.3 Gb for C. auratus red var., and 18.5 Gb for C. carpio L. for liver tissue; and obtained 36.1 Gb clean data for R2C, 34.5 Gb for RC2, 36.7 Gb for C. auratus red var., and 33.7 Gb for C. carpio L. for muscle tissue (Supplementary Table S1). Then, 35.54 million cleaned reads (73.42%) of C. auratus red var. and 59.21 million cleaned reads (74.69%) of C. carpio L. were mapped against their respective reference genomes, and 154.04 million clean reads (72.49%) of R2C and RC2 were mapped to the combined genome sequences of C. auratus red var. and C. carpio L. by STAR. Detection of R- and C-homoeolog expression values can investigate gene silencing and novel gene expression accompanying genotypic changes in hybrids. The results both in non-orthologous genes and 16,558 orthologous genes showed similar increases in novel expression of R-/C-homoeologs (R-/C-NEGs) from F1 to F18 in the liver (Supplementary Fig. S1). There were also increases in silencing of R-/C-homoeologs (R-/C-SEGs) from F1 to F18 in the liver (Supplementary Fig. S1). In the backcrossing of F18, the increasing number of R-/C-NEGs was observed in both non-orthologous and orthologous of the liver tissue (Supplementary Fig. S1), while the decreasing number of R-/C-SEGs was detected in them. Next, we explored whether the various changes in gene silencing and novel gene expression were led by divergent effects of the two genotyping triploid fishes (R2C and RC2). Analyses of gene expression data from the liver exhibited more C-SEGs in R2C than in RC2 (non-orthologous genes: 81 vs. 19; orthologous genes: 40 vs. 2), and more R-NEGs in R2C than in RC2 (non-orthologous genes: 595 vs. 405, orthologous genes: 237 vs. 185). In contrast, there were fewer R-SEGs in R2C than in RC2 (non-orthologous genes: 105 vs. 161, orthologous genes: 37 vs. 45) and fewer C-NEGs in R2C than in RC2 (non-orthologous genes: 56 vs. 128, orthologous genes: 19 vs. 51). The similar trends were detected in the muscle tissues (Supplementary Fig. S1).

3.3. Differential global expression

Focusing on extent of changes in the polymorphic expression, we analysed the global expression of both R-/C-homoeologs in the 16,558 orthologous gene pairs. The greatest number of DEGs between the inbred maternal C. auratus red var. and its progeny was in the triploids (2,091 DEGs in R2C and 2,371 DEGs in RC2) (Fig. 2a). Meanwhile, the greatest number of DEGs between the inbred paternal C. carpio L. and its progeny was also in the triploids (735 DEGs in R2C and 400 DEGs in RC2) (Fig. 2a). The extents of differential gene expression in R2C and RC2 were larger than ones between the inbred parents and other hybrids (F1 and F18) (Fig. 2a), revealing that cumulative effects occurred in global expression accompanied with genotypic changes. However, in the muscle, there were fewer DEGs between R2C and maternal R than between R2C and paternal C, and vs. in RC2 (Fig. 2b). These results suggested different genetic regulation between the liver and muscle.
Figure 2

Differential gene expression analyses of global expression levels of the allopolyploid complex. (a) Differential expression in liver tissue [e.g. 518 up-regulated genes of R (blue) and 772 up-regulated genes of C (red) were detected between C. auratus red var. and C. carpio L.]. The blue dot in MA plot and blue colour in pie graph represent up-regulated in R, while red dot and red colour represent up-regulated in C. (b) Differential expression in muscle tissue. Color figures are available at DNARES online.

Differential gene expression analyses of global expression levels of the allopolyploid complex. (a) Differential expression in liver tissue [e.g. 518 up-regulated genes of R (blue) and 772 up-regulated genes of C (red) were detected between C. auratus red var. and C. carpio L.]. The blue dot in MA plot and blue colour in pie graph represent up-regulated in R, while red dot and red colour represent up-regulated in C. (b) Differential expression in muscle tissue. Color figures are available at DNARES online.

3.4. Differential homoeolog expression analysis

To detect homoeolog expression in the hybrids, a number of 533,453 species-specific SNPs were used to detect 16,558 orthologous gene pairs of the two inbred parent’s genomes using all–against–all reciprocal BLAST. We selected 4,695 orthologous gene pairs that were expressed in the liver of the two inbred parents and their hybrids. The distribution of R- and C-homoeolog expression was determined in the two inbred parents and their hybrids (Fig. 3). The expression levels of the R- and C-homoeologs differed significantly between the two inbred parents (t-test: P = 0.0086 in liver, P = 0.0461 in muscle), and also differed significantly among the hybrids with different genotypes (P < 0.0001), except in the muscle of RC2 (P = 0.072) (Fig. 3). Differences in expression levels between the all two homoeologs were found in R2C in the liver (AD = 1.87) and in the muscle (AD = 1.79). However, similar homoeolog expression levels between the two subgenomes were detected in both the liver and the muscle of RC2, despite the imbalance of the two subgenomes.
Figure 3

Distribution of R- and C-homoeolog expression values in allopolyploid complex. (a) Homoeolog expression level in liver. (b) Homoeolog expression level in muscle. The AD values was calculated between R- and C-homoeolog expression in hybrids, for example, the AD was 1.25 in liver of F1. (c) Coefficients of determination calculated for R-/C-homoeolog expression between hybrids and their respective inbred parents (P < 0.0001). The values of log2 fold changes of gene expression level present the values of log2 normalized read counts.

Distribution of R- and C-homoeolog expression values in allopolyploid complex. (a) Homoeolog expression level in liver. (b) Homoeolog expression level in muscle. The AD values was calculated between R- and C-homoeolog expression in hybrids, for example, the AD was 1.25 in liver of F1. (c) Coefficients of determination calculated for R-/C-homoeolog expression between hybrids and their respective inbred parents (P < 0.0001). The values of log2 fold changes of gene expression level present the values of log2 normalized read counts. The changes in R- and C-homoeolog expression levels led us to investigate the correlation between R-/C-homoeolog expression levels in the hybrids and those in their inbred parents. We calculated the coefficient of determination for homoeolog expression levels in liver tissue between hybrids and their respective parents. The highest coefficient of determination for C-homoeologs was in F1 (R2= 0.49) and that for R-homoeologs was in F18 (R2 = 0.59) (Fig. 3c). In addition, the coefficients of determination were higher for the muscle than the liver (Fig. 3c) and higher for R-homoeologs than C-homoeologs (Supplementary Tables S2 and S3).

3.5. Determination of R incomplete dominance and dosage compensation

To explore the reasons for the differences in magnitude of R- and C-homoeolog expression levels, we set two thresholds to determine the R- and C-homoeolog expression bias (R-HEB and C-HEB, respectively). The same maternal R-HEB was detected in the liver of three fish types (ratio of R-HEB: 87.45% in F1, 73.18% in R2C, and 73.63% in RC2), while R- and C-HEB were balanced in parents based on Ehybrid (Fig. 4a and Table 1). This result confirmed the existence of R incomplete dominance in this allopolyploid complex. Interestingly, although there was a 1:1 ratio of R:C chromosomes in F1 and F18, R-HEB and C-HEB differed markedly between them. We detected similar R-HEB and C-HEB in the two triploid fish, although they had different ratios of R:C chromosomes. These results further suggested that different regulation mechanisms might occur in these hybrids. However, the maternal R-HEB was high in R2C and was greater in the muscle (87.17%) than in the liver (73.18%). We detected slight paternal C-HEB in the muscle of RC2 (52.50%) (Table 1). These results further indicated that the regulation mechanisms might differ between the liver and the muscle.
Figure 4

Effect of R incomplete dominance and dosage compensation in the allopolyploid complex. (a) Distribution of log2(C-homoeolog/R-homoeolog) values in liver and muscle of in silico parents and their hybrid offspring. Scatter point represents 5% highest and lowest values. (b–d) Effects of R incomplete dominance and dosage compensation in the two triploid fish. Blue arrow represents direction and magnitude of R incomplete dominance; green arrow represents direction and magnitude of dosage compensation. Color figures are available at DNARES online.

Table 1

Homoeologue expression bias (HEB) was calculated on the two thresholds in hybrids

No. of genes with potential R-HEBaNo. of genes with potential C-HEBaNo. of genes with R-HEBbNo. of genes with C-HEBbTotal
Liver
In silico parents2,484 (52.91%)2,211 (47.09%)656 (13.97%)612 (13.04%)4,695
  F14,106 (87.45%)589 (12.55%)2,094 (44.60%)93 (1.98%)4,695
  F182,303 (49.05%)2,392 (50.95%)646 (13.76%)409 (8.71%)4,695
  R2C3,436 (73.18%)1,259 (26.82%)1,371 (29.20%)203 (4.32%)4,695
  RC23,457 (73.63%)1,238 (26.37%)1,244 (26.50%)155 (3.30%)4,695
Muscle
In silico parents3,653 (49.21%)3,770 (50.79%)897 (12.08%)810 (10.91%)7,423
  R2C6,471 (87.17%)952 (12.83%)3,107 (41.86%)147 (1.98%)7,423
  RC23,526 (47.50%)3,897 (52.50%)952 (12.83%)815 (10.98%)7,423

If the value of Ebias is > 0, it is considered as potential C-biased in hybrids. If the value of Ebias is < 0, it is considered as potential R-biased.

If the value of Ebias is > 2, it is considered as C-biased in hybrids. If the value of Ebias is < −2, it is considered as R-biased.

Effect of R incomplete dominance and dosage compensation in the allopolyploid complex. (a) Distribution of log2(C-homoeolog/R-homoeolog) values in liver and muscle of in silico parents and their hybrid offspring. Scatter point represents 5% highest and lowest values. (b–d) Effects of R incomplete dominance and dosage compensation in the two triploid fish. Blue arrow represents direction and magnitude of R incomplete dominance; green arrow represents direction and magnitude of dosage compensation. Color figures are available at DNARES online. Homoeologue expression bias (HEB) was calculated on the two thresholds in hybrids If the value of Ebias is > 0, it is considered as potential C-biased in hybrids. If the value of Ebias is < 0, it is considered as potential R-biased. If the value of Ebias is > 2, it is considered as C-biased in hybrids. If the value of Ebias is < −2, it is considered as R-biased. To explore the potential mechanisms related to changes of homoeolog expression in the triploids, we tried to calculate the unknown effect under R incomplete dominance that had been observed in F1 and F18 individuals in this allopolyploid complex. The reverse direction of the unknown effect was observed in liver of RC2 and R2C (Fig. 4b and c). After calculating the values of ER2C and ERC2, the dosage compensation in liver of RC2 and R2C were determined by calculating the difference between ER2C/ERC2 and Ehybrid, relative to the expression level of parental R and C (Fig. 4b and c). Under this situation, we also tried to assess the regulation mechanism in the muscle. The same direction of HEB and a similar magnitude of expression indicated that only R incomplete dominance affected gene expression in the muscle (Fig. 4d).

3.6. Expression of growth-related genes under R incomplete dominance and dosage compensation

To investigate the potential relationship between growth heterosis and R incomplete dominance/dosage compensation, we calculated the Ebias and Ehybrid values for the growth-regulated genes (Supplementary Table S4). In these analyses, the two triploid fishes were clustered with each other (Fig. 5a). For investigating the relationship of gene expression and growth heterosis, the expression values of the growth-regulated genes were calculated from in silico parents to the two triploid progenies. There were high ratios of R-HEB genes (76.74% in R2C and 72.10% in RC2) among the 43 genes in the liver , and high ratios of R-HEB genes ( 91.14% in R2C and 55.70% in RC2) among the 79 genes in the muscle (Fig. 5b). Further analyses showed that the most (28 in R2C and 27 in RC2) of the 43 growth-regulated genes in the liver of the allotriploids exhibited greater R-HEB than that in their parents (Fig. 5b). Sixty-six of 79 growth-regulated genes in the muscle of R2C also had greater R-HEB than that in their parents, while only 29 of 79 genes in ones of RC2 had greater R-HEB than that in their parents (Fig. 5b).
Figure 5

Expression profiles of growth-regulated genes in the two triploids and their inbred parents. (a) Values of global expression levels in liver (43 genes) and muscle (79 genes). Euclidean distance and maximum linkage clustering method were used. The ordinate of heatmap is determined by the values of log2 normalized read counts. (b) log2(C-homoeolog/R-homoeolog) values in liver and muscle of in silico parents and the two triploid offspring.

Expression profiles of growth-regulated genes in the two triploids and their inbred parents. (a) Values of global expression levels in liver (43 genes) and muscle (79 genes). Euclidean distance and maximum linkage clustering method were used. The ordinate of heatmap is determined by the values of log2 normalized read counts. (b) log2(C-homoeolog/R-homoeolog) values in liver and muscle of in silico parents and the two triploid offspring.

4. Discussion

The complex model of allopolyploid lineages provides abundant genotypes and phenotypes. Transcriptome analysis of them can be used to investigate the potential regulation mechanisms related to allopolyploidization. In recent studies, dosage compensation and incomplete dominance have emerged as important processes in the formation of qualitative and quantitative traits, including heterosis., In this study, R incomplete dominance was detected in the allotetraploid lineage including the allodiploid F1, allotetraploid F18, and the allotriploids R2C and R2C. We also studied dosage compensation in the two triploid genotypes (R2C and R2C) with two sets of R or C chromosomes, because integrated analyses of dosage compensation and incomplete dominance can shed light on the potential mechanisms regarding heterosis. The successful establishment of allotetraploids of C. auratus red var. (♀) × C. carpio L. (♂) provided a chance to obtain triploids showing heterosis by backcrossing breeding.,, Although the allotetraploids were considered to be a stable allotetraploid population based on chromosome number analysis, there was lack of genotypic data of the heterozygous gamete. Therefore, the consistent genotypes in R2C and R2C individuals supported the stable heterozygous gametes from female allotetraploid individuals (Fig. 1). Assessment of gene silencing and novel gene expression in the allodiploid F1 and allotetraploid F18 revealed increases in R-/C-NEGs and R-/C-SEGs (Supplementary Fig. S1), suggesting that the constraint of the expression of polymorphism gradually weakened through the whole genome duplication in the hybrids. The duplication of genes, chromosomes, and whole genome could contribute to expression divergence., Then, the triploids with asymmetric subgenomes showed increased R-/C-NEGs and decreased R-/C-SEGs in the liver. This result suggested that two sets of the homologous chromosomes could inhibit silencing and promote novel expression of corresponding homoeologs based on the copy number of R-/C-homologous chromosomes. These changes will lead to the emergence of dominance of partial homoeologs and contribute to heterosis. Global expression changes also indicated that constraints of gene expression in the inbred parents gradually weakened as a result of genotypic changes in hybrids (Fig. 2). Moreover, the most DEGs were detected in triploids, suggesting that the asymmetric subgenomes could rapidly and greatly speeded up this process, which may help us understand of the emergence of heterosis (Fig. 2). Analyses of the magnitude of gene expression in the four hybrids (F1, F18, R2C, and RC2) exhibited that the greatest HEB was in the allotriploids R2C (AD = 1.87 in the liver and AD = 1.79 in the muscle) (Fig. 3). This phenomenon revealed that the imbalance of the two homoeologs at the genomic level might contribute to greater HEB, although smallest HEB was found in RC2 (Fig. 3). Analyses of homoeolog expression between inbred parents and hybrids revealed higher coefficients of determination for R-homoeologs than for C-homoeologs (Supplementary Tables S2 and S3), indicating that the R genome plays the dominant role in these hybrid fish. Therefore, evolution could be occurring rapidly with respect to C-homoeolog sequences and expression. Based on the in silico values of Ehybrid, ER2C, and ERC2, we determined the direct effects and the magnitude of the regulation mechanisms. Both dosage compensation and the R incomplete dominance effects were detected in the liver of R2C and RC2. The different directions of HEB led by dosage compensation and R incomplete dominance in the liver of R2C were partly counteracted by R-HEB. Meanwhile, the same direction of HEB led by dosage compensation and R incomplete dominance together shaped the increased trend of R-HEB in the liver of RC2 (Fig. 4). Only R incomplete dominance was detected as a regulation mechanism in the muscle of the two triploids. This may be related to epigenetic regulation such as miRNAs and RNA-directed DNA methylation in the allopolyploids. In addition, the differences in the magnitude of expression between the liver and muscle may relate to mosaic dominance (Fig. 3 and Table 1). Further research using more genotypes is required to explore this possibility. Both R incomplete dominance and the dosage compensation shaped mRNA expression in these triploids. These effects made the changes in mRNA expression at global and homoeolog levels more complex, which made it difficult to understand the mechanism of regulation of biological traits in the triploids. The phenomenon of growth heterosis in these fishes is well known but still poorly understood. Focussing on growth-regulated genes, comparisons between the two inbred parents and their triploid offspring at the global expression level revealed 43 genes of interest in the liver and 79 in the muscle. The R incomplete dominance of growth-regulated genes, which is related to differences in growth vigour between the two inbred parents, may contribute to growth heterosis (Fig. 5). In addition, the magnitude of R-HEB in the 79 growth-regulated genes of RC2 muscle (55.70%) was slighter than that in R2C (91.14%) (Fig. 5b), while individuals of RC2 exhibited more rapid growth than R2C. These results suggested that the appropriate balance of R-/C-HEB in the growth-regulated genes could effectively contribute to the more obvious growth heterosis in the two triploids. However, the further testing is needed to validate it. A similar phenomenon has been described in rice,, tomato, and maize. Although few studies have focussed on the relationship between R incomplete dominance and heterosis in animals, there are some reports on this relationship in salmonids and in an allotetraploid of goldfish × common carp. Although dosage compensation could be related to heterosis,, our results suggested that R incomplete dominance contributes to heterosis in the muscle of triploid fishes.

Accession numbers

All short-read RNA-seq data have been deposited in the Short Read Archive under the following accession numbers: SRS4475349, SRS4475350, SRS4475351, SRS4475352, SRS4475353, and SRS4475354.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31702334, 31730098, and 31430088), the Key Research and Development Program of Hunan Province (Grant No. 2018NK2072), the Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System (Grant No. CARS-45), the Key Research and Development Project of Hunan Province (Grant No. 2016NK2128), the Key Research and Development Program of Hunan Province (Grant No. 2018NK2072), Hunan Provincial Natural Science and Technology Major Project (Grant No. 2017NK1031), and the Cooperative Innovation Center of Engineering and New Products for Developmental Biology of Hunan Province (Grant No. 20134486).

Conflict of interest

None declared. Click here for additional data file.
  35 in total

Review 1.  Genome and gene duplications and gene expression divergence: a view from plants.

Authors:  Yupeng Wang; Xiyin Wang; Andrew H Paterson
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Mosaic Dominance in the Inheritance of Color Patterns in the Lady-Bird Beetle, Harmonia Axyridis.

Authors:  C C Tan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1946-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Heterosis in elite hybrid rice: speculation on the genetic and biochemical mechanisms.

Authors:  Stephen A Goff; Qifa Zhang
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 7.834

4.  Heterosis: The genetic basis of hybrid vigour.

Authors:  James A Birchler
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 15.793

5.  Inheritance of gene expression level and selective constraints on trans- and cis-regulatory changes in yeast.

Authors:  Bernhard Schaefke; J J Emerson; Tzi-Yuan Wang; Mei-Yeh Jade Lu; Li-Ching Hsieh; Wen-Hsiung Li
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  A screen for recessive speciation genes expressed in the gametes of F1 hybrid yeast.

Authors:  Duncan Greig
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Genomic analysis of hybrid rice varieties reveals numerous superior alleles that contribute to heterosis.

Authors:  Xuehui Huang; Shihua Yang; Junyi Gong; Yan Zhao; Qi Feng; Hao Gong; Wenjun Li; Qilin Zhan; Benyi Cheng; Junhui Xia; Neng Chen; Zhongna Hao; Kunyan Liu; Chuanrang Zhu; Tao Huang; Qiang Zhao; Lei Zhang; Danlin Fan; Congcong Zhou; Yiqi Lu; Qijun Weng; Zi-Xuan Wang; Jiayang Li; Bin Han
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Incomplete dominance of deleterious alleles contributes substantially to trait variation and heterosis in maize.

Authors:  Jinliang Yang; Sofiane Mezmouk; Andy Baumgarten; Edward S Buckler; Katherine E Guill; Michael D McMullen; Rita H Mumm; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data.

Authors:  Mark D Robinson; Davis J McCarthy; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Homoeologue expression insights into the basis of growth heterosis at the intersection of ploidy and hybridity in Cyprinidae.

Authors:  Li Ren; Wuhui Li; Min Tao; Qinbo Qin; Jing Luo; Jing Chai; Chenchen Tang; Jun Xiao; Xiaojun Tang; Guoliang Lin; Chun Zhang; Wei Duan; Yunhan Hong; Shaojun Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  4 in total

1.  Heterosis of growth trait regulated by DNA methylation and miRNA in allotriploid fish.

Authors:  Li Ren; Hong Zhang; Mengxue Luo; Xin Gao; Jialin Cui; Xueyin Zhang; Shaojun Liu
Journal:  Epigenetics Chromatin       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 5.465

2.  Diverse transcriptional patterns of homoeologous recombinant transcripts in triploid fish (Cyprinidae).

Authors:  Li Ren; Xueyin Zhang; Jiaming Li; Xiaojing Yan; Xin Gao; Jialin Cui; Chenchen Tang; Shaojun Liu
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 6.038

3.  Correlations of expression of nuclear and mitochondrial genes in triploid fish.

Authors:  Jialin Cui; Hong Zhang; Xin Gao; Xueyin Zhang; Mengxue Luo; Li Ren; Shaojun Liu
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.542

4.  Symmetric subgenomes and balanced homoeolog expression stabilize the establishment of allopolyploidy in cyprinid fish.

Authors:  Li Ren; Xin Gao; Jialin Cui; Chun Zhang; He Dai; Mengxue Luo; Shaofang He; Qinbo Qin; Kaikun Luo; Min Tao; Jun Xiao; Jing Wang; Hong Zhang; Xueyin Zhang; Yi Zhou; Jing Wang; Xin Zhao; Guiming Liu; Guoliang Wang; Linhe Huo; Shi Wang; Fangzhou Hu; Rurong Zhao; Rong Zhou; Yude Wang; Qinfeng Liu; Xiaojing Yan; Chang Wu; Conghui Yang; Chenchen Tang; Wei Duan; Shaojun Liu
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 7.364

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.