| Literature DB >> 31883002 |
Li Ren1,2, Xiaojing Yan1,2, Liu Cao1,2, Jiaming Li1,2, Xueyin Zhang1,2, Xin Gao1,2, Jia Liu1,2, Jialin Cui1,2, Shaojun Liu1,2.
Abstract
Hybridization and polyploidy are pervasive evolutionary features of flowering plants and frequent among some animal groups, such as fish. These processes always lead to novel genotypes and various phenotypes, including growth heterosis. However, its genetic basis in lower vertebrate is still poorly understood. Here, we conducted transcriptome-level analyses of the allopolyploid complex of Carassius auratus red var. (R) (♀) × Cyprinus carpio L. (C) (♂), including the allodiploid and allotetraploid with symmetric subgenomes, and the two allotriploids with asymmetric subgenomes. The gradual changes of gene silencing and novel gene expression suggested the weakening of the constraint of polymorphic expression in genotypic changes. Then, analyses of the direction and magnitude of homoeolog expression exhibited various asymmetric expression patterns, which supported that R incomplete dominance and dosage compensation were co-regulated in the two triploids. Under these effects, various magnitudes of R-homoeolog expression bias were observed in growth-regulated genes, suggesting that they might contribute to growth heterosis in the two triploids. The determination of R incomplete dominance and dosage compensation, which might be led by asymmetric subgenomes and multiple sets of homologous chromosomes, explained why various expression patterns were shaped and their potential contribution to growth heterosis in the two triploids.Entities:
Keywords: allotriploid; asymmetric subgenomes; dosage compensation; homoeolog expression; incomplete dominance
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31883002 PMCID: PMC6993813 DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsz026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: DNA Res ISSN: 1340-2838 Impact factor: 4.458
Figure 1Genotypes of two cyprinids and their four types of hybrid offspring. R2C and RC2 derived from backcrossing of allotetraploid of C. auratus red var. (♀) × C. carpio L. (♂). One hundred signals were detected in R2C (100 chromosomes from C. auratus red var. and other 50 from C. carpio L.). Fifty signals were detected in RC2 (50 chromosomes from C. auratus red var. and other 100 from C. carpio L.). The specific-probe of C. auratus red var. was detected using FISH. Color figures are available at DNARES online.
Figure 2Differential gene expression analyses of global expression levels of the allopolyploid complex. (a) Differential expression in liver tissue [e.g. 518 up-regulated genes of R (blue) and 772 up-regulated genes of C (red) were detected between C. auratus red var. and C. carpio L.]. The blue dot in MA plot and blue colour in pie graph represent up-regulated in R, while red dot and red colour represent up-regulated in C. (b) Differential expression in muscle tissue. Color figures are available at DNARES online.
Figure 3Distribution of R- and C-homoeolog expression values in allopolyploid complex. (a) Homoeolog expression level in liver. (b) Homoeolog expression level in muscle. The AD values was calculated between R- and C-homoeolog expression in hybrids, for example, the AD was 1.25 in liver of F1. (c) Coefficients of determination calculated for R-/C-homoeolog expression between hybrids and their respective inbred parents (P < 0.0001). The values of log2 fold changes of gene expression level present the values of log2 normalized read counts.
Figure 4Effect of R incomplete dominance and dosage compensation in the allopolyploid complex. (a) Distribution of log2(C-homoeolog/R-homoeolog) values in liver and muscle of in silico parents and their hybrid offspring. Scatter point represents 5% highest and lowest values. (b–d) Effects of R incomplete dominance and dosage compensation in the two triploid fish. Blue arrow represents direction and magnitude of R incomplete dominance; green arrow represents direction and magnitude of dosage compensation. Color figures are available at DNARES online.
Homoeologue expression bias (HEB) was calculated on the two thresholds in hybrids
| No. of genes with potential R-HEB | No. of genes with potential C-HEB | No. of genes with R-HEB | No. of genes with C-HEB | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liver | |||||
| | 2,484 (52.91%) | 2,211 (47.09%) | 656 (13.97%) | 612 (13.04%) | 4,695 |
| F1 | 4,106 (87.45%) | 589 (12.55%) | 2,094 (44.60%) | 93 (1.98%) | 4,695 |
| F18 | 2,303 (49.05%) | 2,392 (50.95%) | 646 (13.76%) | 409 (8.71%) | 4,695 |
| R2C | 3,436 (73.18%) | 1,259 (26.82%) | 1,371 (29.20%) | 203 (4.32%) | 4,695 |
| RC2 | 3,457 (73.63%) | 1,238 (26.37%) | 1,244 (26.50%) | 155 (3.30%) | 4,695 |
| Muscle | |||||
| | 3,653 (49.21%) | 3,770 (50.79%) | 897 (12.08%) | 810 (10.91%) | 7,423 |
| R2C | 6,471 (87.17%) | 952 (12.83%) | 3,107 (41.86%) | 147 (1.98%) | 7,423 |
| RC2 | 3,526 (47.50%) | 3,897 (52.50%) | 952 (12.83%) | 815 (10.98%) | 7,423 |
If the value of Ebias is > 0, it is considered as potential C-biased in hybrids. If the value of Ebias is < 0, it is considered as potential R-biased.
If the value of Ebias is > 2, it is considered as C-biased in hybrids. If the value of Ebias is < −2, it is considered as R-biased.
Figure 5Expression profiles of growth-regulated genes in the two triploids and their inbred parents. (a) Values of global expression levels in liver (43 genes) and muscle (79 genes). Euclidean distance and maximum linkage clustering method were used. The ordinate of heatmap is determined by the values of log2 normalized read counts. (b) log2(C-homoeolog/R-homoeolog) values in liver and muscle of in silico parents and the two triploid offspring.