| Literature DB >> 31881652 |
W Douglas Evans1, Bonnie N Young2, Michael A Johnson3, Kirstie A Jagoe3, Dana Charron3, Madeleine Rossanese3, K Lloyd Morgan4, Patricia Gichinga4, Julie Ipe5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Globally, an estimated 3.6 billion people rely on solid fuels for cooking over open fires or in simple cookstoves. Universal access to clean cooking fuels and technology by 2030 is a United Nations' Sustainable Development Goal.Entities:
Keywords: behavior change communication; cookstoves; demand creation; environment; public health; social marketing
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31881652 PMCID: PMC6981508 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17010162
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Summary of Shamba Chef intervention.
| Location | Aim | BCC Media Channels and Themes | Dates | Estimated Reach |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya. | To increase knowledge and awareness of the benefits of modern cookstoves. | The Mediae campaign featured the | Aired once/week for 60 minutes from Sept-Dec 2017 | About 5 million people |
Shamba Chef Message Content.
| Modern Cookstoves | Nutrition | Taglines |
|---|---|---|
| Save money and save time in the kitchen. | A balanced diet is important for the family’s health. | We explore new ways to cook, to make it quicker, safer, cleaner and at half the cost |
* Chamas and Saccos are informal self-help cooperatives that are normally used to pool and invest savings by its members.
Demographic and Socioeconomic Data.
| Baseline | Post-Intervention | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Percent (%) | Count | Percent (%) | |
| 1 | Male | 78 | 9 | 117 | 14 |
| 2 | Female | 776 | 91 | 743 | 86 |
|
| |||||
| 1 | Male | 10 | 45 | 10 | 91 |
| 2 | Female | 12 | 55 | 1 | 9 |
| Groups too small to perform chi-square | |||||
|
| |||||
| 1 | None, primary | 360 | 42 | 326 | 38 |
| 2 | Some secondary or | 495 | 58 | 532 | 62 |
|
| |||||
| 1 | None, primary | 443 | 52 | 456 | 53 |
| 2 | Some secondary or | 408 | 48 | 401 | 47 |
|
| |||||
| 1 | Married | 605 | 71 | 559 | 65 |
| 2 | Single, separated, divorced, widowed, | 250 | 29 | 297 | 35 |
|
| |||||
| 1 | Yes | 480 | 56 | 542 | 63 |
| 2 | No | 375 | 44 | 318 | 37 |
Exposure to Shamba Chef TV and radio broadcasts at post-test.
| Variable | Response | Freq. | Percent (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| 1 | One or more times | 311 | 47 |
| 2 | Never | 354 | 53 |
|
| |||
| 1 | One or more times | 225 | 30 |
| 2 | Never | 521 | 70 |
Relationship between exposure and the seven outcomes of interest.
| Multivariable (Adjusted) Model: (Number of Observations Used); Odds Ratio (95% CI) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposures of Interest | Awareness of Improved Biomass Stoves1 | Awareness of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) Stoves1 | Positive Attitudes as a Dichotomous Variable 1,3
| Intention to Purchase a Modern Stove within Next Month1 | Aspiration to Use LPG for Cooking among those Who do not Currently own LPG1 |
| (N=738) | (N=738) | (N=600) | (N=601) | (N=342) | |
| (N=658) | (N=657) | (N=598) | (N=599) | (N=295) | |
| (N=738) | (N=738) | (N=600) | (N=601) | (N=342) | |
| All responses have same response due to filtering based on the outcome of interest. | (N=601) | (N=599) | (N=1162) | (N=248) | |
Relationship between exposure and the seven outcomes of interest (continued).
| Multivariable (Adjusted) Model: (Number of Observations Used); Odds Ratio (95% CI, | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposures of interest | Purchase of an LPG stove within the BCC exposure period1 | Aspirations to own a modern biomass stove1 | Aspirations to own an LPG stove1 | Aspirations to use more LPG more than you do now 1
|
| (N = 176) | (N = 724) | (N = 724) | (N = 229) | |
| 2a. Visual aid J: Shamba Chef TV | (N = 156) | (N = 643) | (N = 643) | (N = 197) |
| 2b. Audio aid M: Shamba Chef Radio | (N = 176) | (N = 724) | (N = 724) | (N = 229) |
| (N = 150) | (N = 1144) | (N = 1144) | (N = 188) | |
1 Full models were adjusted for the exposure of interest plus 12 covariates: socioeconomic status (LSM score), area (urban, peri-urban, or rural), education, age, sex, marital status (married vs. all else), use of TV, radio, internet, mobile phone, and social media, and ownership of two or more stove types. These covariates were selected based on their associations with the outcome of interest. The adjusted effects of the exposure on the outcome did not vary in effect measure or precision based on inclusion or removal of these covariates; therefore, the full models are presented. 2 Exposure data only available from the endline survey, question not asked in baseline. 3 Attitudes towards modern cookstoves stoves included 12 items: less fuel, saves money, saves time, reduces smoke, cleaner kitchen, accessible, warranty for years, reduces health issues, loans are available, solution for a modern kitchen, male can purchase, overall quicker/safer/cleaner/cheaper.