| Literature DB >> 30861029 |
W Douglas Evans1, Cody Donahue2, Jeremy Snider3, Nafisa Bedri4, Tibyaan A Elhussein4, Samira Ahmed Elamin5.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The overall goal of the Saleema Initiative in Sudan is to promote long-term abandonment of female genital mutilation and cutting (FGM) through a contribution to changing social norms, attitudes, and intentions related to the practice. The initiative aims to create positive cultural associations with a girl remaining uncut, a new social norm. Saleema hypothesizes that branding the alternative to FGM (abandonment) will promote social norms change. In 2014, the lead author designed a monitoring and evaluation framework for Saleema in partnership with UNICEF, the National Council for Child Welfare (NCCW), and local organizations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30861029 PMCID: PMC6413931 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213380
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
FGM social norms agreement (lower scores desirable).
| Overall agreement by Wave, % (SE) | Most people in your community practice CUTTING | Most of my friends practice CUTTING | It is appropriate for families in my community to practice CUTTING | Sudanese society in general considers it appropriate to practice CUTTING | Norms Factor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 65.9% (0.8%) | 58% (0.9%) | 35% (0.8%) | 62.9% (0.9%) | 1.59 (0.01) |
| 2 | 56.4% (0.9%) | 47.6% (0.9%) | 24.3% (0.7%) | 48.4% (0.9%) | 1.43 (0.01) |
| 3 | 48.5% (0.9%) | 41.9% (0.9%) | 26% (0.7%) | 44.8% (0.9%) | 1.4 (0.01) |
| All | 56.8% (0.5%) | 49.1% (0.5%) | 28.4% (0.4%) | 51.9% (0.5%) | 1.47 (0.01) |
FGM social norms.
| Mean Score (1–4), SE | % Agree, SE | Factor Loading | Alpha | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Most people in your community practice CUTTING | 2.62 | 0.56 | 0.7807 | 0.8274 |
| (0.08) | (0.04) | |||
| Most of my friends practice CUTTING | 2.50 | 0.48 | 0.8247 | |
| (0.08) | (0.05) | |||
| It is appropriate for families in my community to practice CUTTING | 2.14 | 0.25 | 0.6091 | |
| (0.07) | (0.03) | |||
| Sudanese society in general considers it appropriate to practice CUTTING | 2.52 | 0.50 | 0.6992 | |
| (0.08) | (0.05) |
Self-reported Saleema advertising exposure regressions at wave 3.
| Most people in your community practice CUTTING | Most of my friends practice CUTTING | It is appropriate for families in my community to practice CUTTING | Sudanese society in general considers it appropriate to practice CUTTING | Social Norms Factor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Any Ad Exposure | 0.570 | 0.539 | 0.508 | 0.418 | -0.329 |
| (Ref = No exposure) | (0.366, 0.775) | (0.306, 0.772) | (0.242, 0.774) | (0.203, 0.633) | (-0.375, -0.284) |
| Gender | 1.157 | 1.21 | 0.919 | 1.300 | 0.035 |
| ref = Female | (0.943, 1.371) | (0.968, 1.453) | (0.634, 1.204) | (1.080, 1.520) | (-0.013, 0.083) |
| Age | 1 | 1.004 | 1.002 | 1.001 | -0.001 |
| Continuous | (0.992, 1.008) | (0.995, 1.013) | (0.992, 1.012) | (0.993, 1.010) | (-0.003, 0.001) |
| HS or Greater Education | 0.825 | 0.608 | 0.494 | 0.799 | -0.183 |
| ref = No Education | (0.531, 1.120) | (0.263, 0.954) | (0.088, 0.901) | (0.496, 1.102) | (-0.246, -0.121) |
| Marital Status | 0.91 | 0.941 | 0.867 | 0.749 | -0.013 |
| ref = Not Married | (0.651, 1.169) | (0.645, 1.238) | (0.535, 1.199) | (0.489, 1.008) | (-0.071, 0.045) |
*p < .05
**p < .01
***p < .001
Regressions of events exposure on social norms waves 2–3.
| Odds Ratios, | Most people in your community practice CUTTING | Most of my friends practice CUTTING | It is appropriate for families in my community to practice CUTTING | Sudanese society in general considers it appropriate to practice CUTTING | Social Norms Factor (Score based on 4 measured variables to left) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wave 3 | 1.206 | 1.957 | 1.199 | 2.629 | 0.207 |
| Change from Wave 2–3 | (0.831, 1.581) | (1.544, 2.370) | (0.750, 1.649) | (2.209, 3.050) | (0.126, 0.289) |
| Lpcw | 1.341 | 1.278 | 1.047 | 1.083 | 0.081 |
| Logged per capita community events | (1.230, 1.452) | (1.145, 1.411) | (0.899, 1.195) | (0.970, 1.196) | (0.061, 0.101) |
| Wave 3:lpcw | 0.746 | 0.649 | 0.885 | 0.664 | -0.146 |
| Change in logged community per capita variable from wave 2–3 | (0.570, 0.922) | (0.448, 0.850) | (0.673, 1.097) | (0.461, 0.867) | (-0.183, -0.109) |
| Gender (Male) | 1.141 | 1.013 | 0.874 | 1.442 | 0.041 |
| ref = Female | (0.978, 1.303) | (0.830, 1.197) | (0.657, 1.091) | (1.270, 1.614) | (0.006, 0.076) |
| Age | 1.005 | 1.007 | 1.005 | 1.010 | 0.002 |
| Continuous | (0.999, 1.011) | (1.000, 1.013) | (0.997, 1.012) | (1.004, 1.016) | (0.001, 0.003) |
| High School (HS) education or More | 0.914 | 0.792 | 0.614 | 0.946 | 0.136 |
| Ref = less than HS | (0.692, 1.136) | (0.537, 1.046) | (0.311, 0.917) | (0.712, 1.180) | (0.090, 0.181) |
| Marital status | 0.808 | 0.847 | 0.803 | 0.809 | -0.069 |
| ref = Not Married | (0.622, 0.994) | (0.636, 1.057) | (0.562, 1.044) | (0.611, 1.006) | (-0.109, -0.028) |
*p < .05
**p < .01
***p < .001